I've heard before that Access, the character introduced in "Marvel vs. DC," later appeared in a Green Lantern comic. When I asked around about this, Snoopdogg confirmed that it was true and that he had read that issue before.
What I want to know now is, would this fact make Marvel vs DC canon like Krona's egg appearing in another comic makes JLA/Avengers canon?
They should make it canon by introducing a new version of it. Just retcon the old stuff and start fresh. Then, screw the fan voting. They should just sit down and argue until they come up with good stories that are logical. Wolverine shouldn't beat Lobo, Storm shouldn't beat WW, but in defense of Marvel, you don't have someone like Green Arrow beat say, Iron Man lol.
They would have to make better battles as well. They should re do the whole thing, because most of the matches were just dumb really. Wolverine shouldnt have fought Lobo, in fact Hulk should have fought Lobo. SS vs GL Sentry vs Supes, She Hulk or say Classic Rogue vs WW stuff liek that off the top of my head. It would be cool
Much longer battles. At most, 2 per issue.
Yeah, Hulk vs Lobo would've been much, Much better. I like Hulk, but I could see him losing. It would be a damn good fight. Maybe Lobo'd get too cocky, giving Hulk time to amp up. This fight alone would be one whole issue.
__________________
Shinier than a speeding bullet.
I already knew it was fan-voted, badly written, unbelievable, and unpopular. That's not what I'm asking.
What I am asking is that is it TECHNICALLY canon because Access is now canon- like how Krona's egg appeared in a comic as well and proved JLA/Avengers to be canon?