I might be behind on my OPM, and if one wants to argue strictly in feats, I have no clue. But as far as "point of the character" I don't see how Saitama ever loses.
I'm mainly saying that Saitama, as a character, is essentially unbeatable in the establishment of his world and of his character. I know that the vs forums here tend to be more feat-based – which is why I often don't really argue on here at all – so maybe what I'm saying falls on deaf ears, rightfully so, but it tends to be similar to the "Goku vs Superman" debate.
Superman, as a character, is the pinnacle of the term hero. He will always be just about the best that can be. Goku, as a character, is always about striving to become more. As a basis, it's essentially impossible for Goku to win, ever. Because Superman is always a step beyond, character-wise.
.....I am still confused what people are referring to as 'fts'.
Fights are feats. Lifting the statue of Liberty is a feat. Fighting Flashy Flash and Speed O sonic are feats. Outrunning bullets is a feat. They're all feats.
Ok. Fights are fts but Ive learned from someone that we cant just look at that. They posted a good example of Batman enduring Wonder Woman punches. At first I disagreed with that person, but I've learned that when im debating that person, fights really don't stack up well to fts. Only with that person, though.
It depends. Superman vs Zaar was referenced as PIS and Zaar didnt have that many showings. So I guess it doesn't based off this same confused in the brain, person.