KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Religion Forum » Gnostic Jesus and God

Gnostic Jesus and God
Started by: 123KID

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
123KID
Restricted

Gender:
Location:

Account Restricted

Gnostic Jesus and God

where did Gnostics come up with their theory about there being a higher God ? they were a sect of Christianity correct / so they must have something from the Bible backing up their idea there was some sort of separate "spiritual Jesus" and etc..

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 06:29 AM
123KID is currently offline Click here to Send 123KID a Private Message Find more posts by 123KID Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

They didn't use the Bible. They had their own gospels which were rejected from the accepted canon. Gnostics had different beliefs from region to region so its hard to say exactly where some of them got their ideas.

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 06:34 AM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
They didn't use the Bible. They had their own gospels which were rejected from the accepted canon. Gnostic's had different beliefs from region to region so its hard to say exactly where some of them got their ideas.


The bible (NT) did not exist at the time of the Gnostic's. The books of the NT were available to every Christian. There is a very good chance that the Gnostic where aware of the the books that eventually were added to the bible.

The Gnostic's did not support an all powerful Roman church. Therefore, it is not surprising that they were left out when this Roman church put together the NT.


__________________

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 07:12 AM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
The bible (NT) did not exist at the time of the Gnostic's. The books of the NT were available to every Christian. There is a very good chance that the Gnostic where aware of the the books that eventually were added to the bible.

The Gnostic's did not support an all powerful Roman church. Therefore, it is not surprising that they were left out when this Roman church put together the NT.

Did I say it did? No, not everyone, but yes they were widely accessible. The Gnostics did not use them though, hence why you Gnostic writers did not quote NT books, nor were NT scrolls found at any Gnostic sites.

The biggest reason is the lack of apostolic support for any of them. Thomas was the only one that came close because it was possibly written by an apostle or his followers.

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 05:55 PM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Deja~vu
Dreamer

Gender: Female
Location: Michigan

The Gnostic books were floating around but were considered heresy and not included in the Bible.


__________________
Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before.

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 10:32 PM
Deja~vu is currently offline Click here to Send Deja~vu a Private Message Find more posts by Deja~vu Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
Did I say it did? No, not everyone, but yes they were widely accessible. The Gnostics did not use them though, hence why you Gnostic writers did not quote NT books, nor were NT scrolls found at any Gnostic sites.

The biggest reason is the lack of apostolic support for any of them. Thomas was the only one that came close because it was possibly written by an apostle or his followers.


Not a single book in the NT was written by any of the apostles. Look up the Q Gospel.


__________________

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 10:55 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Deja~vu
Dreamer

Gender: Female
Location: Michigan

The gospel of Q, though unknown writer(s), were pretty true to the statements of Jesus, yes. Then it's up to us/you/others to interpret the meanings of what he was trying to say.


__________________
Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before.

Old Post Jan 2nd, 2008 11:07 PM
Deja~vu is currently offline Click here to Send Deja~vu a Private Message Find more posts by Deja~vu Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Not a single book in the NT was written by any of the apostles. Look up the Q Gospel.
Umm, two were written by disciples at least, a third was written by a disciples scribe. Also, disciple =/= apostle.

Also, I am of the opinion that the Q document never existed. It is a fanciful theory and is a poor solution to a non-existent problem.

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 12:09 AM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Deja~vu
Dreamer

Gender: Female
Location: Michigan

Let's fancy it all then, eh?


__________________
Deja Moo: The feeling that you've heard this bull before.

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 12:43 AM
Deja~vu is currently offline Click here to Send Deja~vu a Private Message Find more posts by Deja~vu Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
Umm, two were written by disciples at least, a third was written by a disciples scribe. Also, disciple =/= apostle.

Also, I am of the opinion that the Q document never existed. It is a fanciful theory and is a poor solution to a non-existent problem.


None of the four Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are original documents written my the people who bear their names. The Q Gospel might have been written by one of those four, but sense we don't have the Q Gospel, we will never know.


__________________

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 02:22 AM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dyajeep
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Philippines

* how about the epistles/letters? they are also parts of the New Testament... and we are very positive those were written by Paul, James, Peter, Jude and John...

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 03:17 PM
dyajeep is currently offline Click here to Send dyajeep a Private Message Find more posts by dyajeep Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by peejayd
* how about the epistles/letters? they are also parts of the New Testament... and we are very positive those were written by Paul, James, Peter, Jude and John...


That is why I clarified my statement by listing Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.


__________________

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 03:33 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
None of the four Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are original documents written my the people who bear their names. The Q Gospel might have been written by one of those four, but sense we don't have the Q Gospel, we will never know.
There is good reason to believe that they were written by the claimed authors. Not that it really matters.

We will likely never have the Q document because such a thing likely never existed.

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 06:27 PM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
There is good reason to believe that they were written by the claimed authors. Not that it really matters.

We will likely never have the Q document because such a thing likely never existed.


What is your good reason?

I find the evidence that supports the Q Gospel to be compelling.


__________________

Old Post Jan 3rd, 2008 06:46 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dyajeep
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Philippines

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
That is why I clarified my statement by listing Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.


* and those epistles/letters go in accordance with the life story of Jesus through the 4 Gospels... eventhough the author did not identify themselves, we are still positive that the 4 Gospels are true... wink

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 10:01 AM
dyajeep is currently offline Click here to Send dyajeep a Private Message Find more posts by dyajeep Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by peejayd
* and those epistles/letters go in accordance with the life story of Jesus through the 4 Gospels... eventhough the author did not identify themselves, we are still positive that the 4 Gospels are true... wink


You will have to define what you mean by the word "true". You can believe anything you wish too.


__________________

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 02:53 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
What is your good reason?

I find the evidence that supports the Q Gospel to be compelling.
The fact that it is not claimed that disciples wrote all the canonical gospels. Early dates of composition, when the alleged authors would still be alive, and early acceptance and defense of the four gospels as canon.

And yet, it can't be found anywhere and no one really talks about anything of the sort. It's wishful thinking and is full of fail imo.

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 10:41 PM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
The fact that it is not claimed that disciples wrote all the canonical gospels. Early dates of composition, when the alleged authors would still be alive, and early acceptance and defense of the four gospels as canon.

And yet, it can't be found anywhere and no one really talks about anything of the sort. It's wishful thinking and is full of fail imo.


Then were are the original writings?


__________________

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 10:47 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Nellinator
Crazy Canuck

Gender: Male
Location: Canada

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
Then were are the original writings?
I support the idea of the gospels being the original writings. Do you not think if the Q document existed it would have been copied and preserved?

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 10:48 PM
Nellinator is currently offline Click here to Send Nellinator a Private Message Find more posts by Nellinator Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Nellinator
I support the idea of the gospels being the original writings. Do you not think if the Q document existed it would have been copied and preserved?


There have been a lot of things lost over time. From what I understand, all we have of all the books of the NT are copies. Am I wrong about that?


__________________

Old Post Jan 4th, 2008 11:02 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 04:56 PM.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Religion Forum » Gnostic Jesus and God

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.