KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Invincible, Omni Man, Thragg vs New 52 Superman, Supergirl

Invincible, Omni Man, Thragg vs New 52 Superman, Supergirl
Started by: CadenceV2

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
CadenceV2
Formerly Sirfizzwhizz

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Invincible, Omni Man, Thragg vs New 52 Superman, Supergirl

The 3 Viltrumites vs the 2 Kryptonians. While many can argue Viltrumites are inferior in power sets, they have impressive stats. They can survive world explosions with little problem, can re arrange mountains, can move light speeds, and have minor healing factors.

If it wasn't for the epic fight of Supreme stalemating Gladiator in a canon crossover to Supreme, who in turn was beaten by Omni Man in a fight even though Supreme has many power sets, I would not even think of making this with any comfort of it not being spite one way or the other.

So debate it.


__________________
Too much work trying to figure how to size a Sig right to have one.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 01:53 PM
CadenceV2 is currently offline Click here to Send CadenceV2 a Private Message Find more posts by CadenceV2 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
TedKordJRBOSS
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Justice League international HQ

Kryptonites


__________________
I hate superman so much it is unbelievable!

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 02:00 PM
TedKordJRBOSS is currently offline Click here to Send TedKordJRBOSS a Private Message Find more posts by TedKordJRBOSS Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

We know Superman can survive inside of the sun even by New 52.

It's how he helped forged the Hellbat suit in Batman and Robin #33.

http://i.imgur.com/Y93RDjH.jpg

Durability should be in their favor because of that.

Superman and Supergirl should have superior lifting strength what with Kal-El being able to bench press the weight of the planet for five days and only breaking a single drop of sweat. That's without constant contact with the sun as well.

As for speed and striking strength, they should be around even. Superman and Supergirl have more abilities in their arsenal that's a no brainer.

Last edited by Sharivan on Aug 30th, 2014 at 02:52 PM

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 02:49 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Digi
Forum Leader

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Iskandar
We know Superman can survive inside of the sun even by New 52.


I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong, but this particular point is dumb. The sun is the source of his power, not a source of harm like it is for most. It's like using the Hulk in a gamma field as a durability feat. You or I in a walk-in freezer for a few minutes is a better durability feat.


__________________

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 03:36 PM
Digi is currently offline Click here to Send Digi a Private Message Find more posts by Digi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Digi
I'm not saying your conclusion is wrong, but this particular point is dumb. The sun is the source of his power, not a source of harm like it is for most. It's like using the Hulk in a gamma field as a durability feat. You or I in a walk-in freezer for a few minutes is a better durability feat.


Not really?

Superman is still absorbing all that energy so unless Superman manages to magically ignore the implications of what it means to contain all of that power in his body it would also be a feat of durability.

Yes, it would make the feat slightly less impressive but that power isn't going anywhere but inside of him.

I understand what you're trying to say but energy absorption also has its limits. The Absorbing Man for instance can't absorb all of the Sentry's power because he is inherently not tough enough to contain all of it. Just for example.

Superman is tough for example to be in the inside the sun, and constantly absorb all that power without blowing up or being killed by it.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 03:59 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
DarkSaint85
Bonified abstract

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Yeah that's because at the same time, he's expending huge amounts of energy just surviving the pressures/heat of the sun. So they balance out.

Had it been a red sun, then you're talking.


__________________

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 04:08 PM
DarkSaint85 is currently offline Click here to Send DarkSaint85 a Private Message Find more posts by DarkSaint85 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

the sun doesn't hurt superman. it amps him. boundlessly. always has. you're ignoring that part of his characterization in favor of fabricating an alleged 'durability feat' that he doesn't even need.

if popeye ate a truckload of spinach in one sitting, i wouldn't think of it as an uber durability feat for his stomach. i'd think: "damn, i bet he became powerful as f*ck!" same thing here.


__________________

Last edited by Galan007 on Aug 30th, 2014 at 04:14 PM

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 04:11 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Prof. T.C McAbe
Kryptonian Scientist

Gender: Male
Location: BatCave

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Iskandar
Not really?

Superman is still absorbing all that energy so unless Superman manages to magically ignore the implications of what it means to contain all of that power in his body it would also be a feat of durability.

Yes, it would make the feat slightly less impressive but that power isn't going anywhere but inside of him.

I understand what you're trying to say but energy absorption also has its limits. The Absorbing Man for instance can't absorb all of the Sentry's power because he is inherently not tough enough to contain all of it. Just for example.

Superman is tough for example to be in the inside the sun, and constantly absorb all that power without blowing up or being killed by it.


We know though from Pre-DCnU that Superman can handle as much energy and from other storylines that he will be even transformed into another, more powerful, being aka Superman Prime. Going by those examples, which are the best we have, it is most likely that there is no limit to the energy he can absorb when he is inside the sun. It is just a matter of time and will till he can control it.

I would go by the already established examples.


__________________


Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 04:12 PM
Prof. T.C McAbe is currently offline Click here to Send Prof. T.C McAbe a Private Message Find more posts by Prof. T.C McAbe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
the sun doesn't hurt superman. it amps him. boundlessly. always has.


Yes but I would think even Superman would have limits before he absorbs too much power like in All-Star Superman where it was going to kill him.

But then there's DC One Million that contradicts that. I don't know I guess it depends on the iteration of Superman.

quote:
you're ignoring that part of his characterization in favor of fabricating an alleged 'durability feat' that he doesn't even need.


I am not fabricating anything and I just felt it was something that should be noted. I even mentioned it would be slightly less impressive because of the absorption. It doesn't doesn't change the fact that he is still managing to absorb that power without it killing him.

Unless you are saying Superman is magically ignoring the implications of absorbing what that much power would mean.

quote:
if popeye ate a truckload of spinach in one sitting, i wouldn't think of it as an uber durability feat for his stomach. i'd think: "damn, i bet he became powerful as f*ck!" same thing here.


So, you are saying Superman is magically ignoring the implications of what absorbing that much power would mean.

Well, I think that's a silly analogy because for starters spinach isn't at all like the sun. It would work if you replace Earth-2's sun with a giant ball of spinach floating in space.

On the other hand if Popeye was eating sun soup or some nonsense I would say that it's a durability feat for his stomach, yes.

Which is a more appropriate analogy for what I am talking about here.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 04:59 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Prof. T.C McAbe
Kryptonian Scientist

Gender: Male
Location: BatCave

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Iskandar
Yes but I would think even Superman would have limits before he absorbs too much power like in All-Star Superman where it was going to kill him.

But then there's DC One Million that contradicts that. I don't know I guess it depends on the iteration of Superman.



I am not fabricating anything and I just felt it was something that should be noted. I even mentioned it would be slightly less impressive because of the absorption. It doesn't doesn't change the fact that he is still managing to absorb that power without it killing him.

Unless you are saying Superman is magically ignoring the implications of absorbing what that much power would mean.



So, you are saying Superman is magically ignoring the implications of what absorbing that much power would mean.

Well, I think that's a silly analogy because for starters spinach isn't at all like the sun. It would work if you replace Earth-2's sun with a giant ball of spinach floating in space.

On the other hand if Popeye was eating sun soup or some nonsense I would say that it's a durability feat for his stomach, yes.

Which is a more appropriate analogy for what I am talking about here.


Let's go by the examples we have in comics.

OWAW, pe DCnU
Superman is transformed but able to handle the energy, focused and cleared his mind to handle it.

Result:
(please log in to view the image)

Superman prime, who spend 10000 years inside the Sun:
(please log in to view the image)

And your example, All Star Superman who was supposed to die because he absorbed too much, went in the end into the sun, where he will become Superman Prime, most likely.

(please log in to view the image)


__________________


Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 05:20 PM
Prof. T.C McAbe is currently offline Click here to Send Prof. T.C McAbe a Private Message Find more posts by Prof. T.C McAbe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe
Let's go by the examples we have in comics.

OWAW, pe DCnU
Superman is transformed but able to handle the energy, focused and cleared his mind to handle it.

Result:
(please log in to view the image)

Superman prime, who spend 10000 years inside the Sun:
(please log in to view the image)

And your example, All Star Superman who was supposed to die because he absorbed too much, went in the end into the sun, where he will become Superman Prime, most likely.

(please log in to view the image)


Which is why I mentioned the DC One Million instance contradicting the All-Star Superman instance.

It's just typically absorbing that much power would require some measure of tolerance or durability to handle it by the standards of RL.

It's not impossible that Superman could simply be ignoring the ramifications of it because comics always sucked at common sense and physics anyway.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 05:31 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Iskandar
It's just typically absorbing that much power would require some measure of tolerance or durability to handle it by the standards of RL.
the sun only amps superman. absolutely no evidence suggests that his ability to process/metabolize solar radiation is limited. he's a comic book character, after all--THE comic book character, in fact. "RL" has no bearing on this type of fictional medium.

arguing against what we've seen on panel is silly.


__________________

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 09:56 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
the sun only amps superman. absolutely no evidence suggests that his ability to process/metabolize solar radiation is limited. he's a comic book character, after all--THE comic book character, in fact. "RL" has no bearing on this type of fictional medium.

arguing against what we've seen on panel is silly.


I wasn't arguing against what we saw on panel? I was saying that what we saw on panel could mean more than what we think it does.

Also, neither does anything we see on panel suggest that New 52 Superman's ability to absorb solar radiation is infinite. Anything "infinite" would be ridiculous by even by Superman's standards anyway.

Otherwise, Superman wouldn't need the sun at all because he could hold so much solar energy that he would never really need to recharge or something.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 10:09 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

lol, you are entitled to your own opinion, i suppose. just know that it is entirely irrelevant, given that absolutely NO on panel evidence supports the notion that superman's ability to process sunlight is finite--quite the opposite, in fact.

we do not need to prove negatives here. on panel evidence ALWAYS supersedes [unsupported] personal conjecture. get used to it. smile


__________________

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 10:12 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
lol, you are entitled to your own opinion, i suppose. just know that it is entirely irrelevant, given that absolutely NO on panel evidence supports the notion that superman's ability to process sunlight is finite--quite the opposite, in fact.


The fact that we know Superman has to consistently recharge/refuel his reverses is evidence that it caps out at some point, and he can't just take a dive in the sun for a long time so he doesn't have to worry about running low in those big fights.

Stuff on panel in fact supports my line of thinking. We know Kal-El at least stores enough solar energy for five days going by his feat of bench pressing the weight of planet.

It's not an opinion it's just something not a lot people think about using the explanation of "lol kryptonians" instead.

Infinite would be a misnomer. Not accurate. What would be accurate is "Superman can hold a large amount of solar energy that can at least last five days under stressful conditions."

quote:
we do not need to prove negatives here. on panel evidence ALWAYS supersedes [unsupported] personal conjecture. get used to it. smile


It's not a conjecture it's just something no one bothered to note before for New 52 Superman, and you're using the excuse of some other events that are not even canon to this iteration.

Not even DC One Million actually proves that it is infinite either. What it does prove is that just doesn't make sense in general.

As Superman staying in the sun for a really, really long times hasn't sucked it dry or speeded up the process of its eventual death causing a supernova. Nor has Superman just absorbed it outright leaving nothing. At least for that version of Superman. That's besides the fact that it is able to provide Superman with more power than it itself has.

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 10:51 PM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Galan007
|Quantum Observer|

Gender: Male
Location: Mars, 1985

laughing out loud

whatever you say.


__________________

Old Post Aug 30th, 2014 11:02 PM
Galan007 is currently offline Click here to Send Galan007 a Private Message Find more posts by Galan007 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Galan007
laughing out loud

whatever you say.


I am being super cereal Galan.

Superman #13

http://i.imgur.com/SDEW2mS.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/TQFgV0e.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/UwGWaCX.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/mCaXQO7.jpg

Super cereal.

Also there was a typo on my part, I meant reserves not reverses. Funny how similar those words are in hindsight.

Anyway, getting back on topic since this thread has been derailed enough.

Action Comics #34

http://i.imgur.com/afLTpSA.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/T5pEtwf.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/wWPwKsp.jpg

Superman and MM changing the trajectory of a mothership bigger than earth. Notable in that it was also moving at 36000 mph. The KE behind that has to be utterly ridiculous.

I think it's safe to say Superman and Supergirl are generally stronger than team one now in both striking/lifting strength.

Old Post Aug 31st, 2014 12:37 AM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Prof. T.C McAbe
Kryptonian Scientist

Gender: Male
Location: BatCave

^You don't like that Superman has infinite potential?

Pre-DCnU is the best we have and there he had no limit to the amount he could absorb, this most likely didn't change.

Accept the truth and go on.


__________________


Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot

Old Post Aug 31st, 2014 12:57 AM
Prof. T.C McAbe is currently offline Click here to Send Prof. T.C McAbe a Private Message Find more posts by Prof. T.C McAbe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Sharivan
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Prof. T.C McAbe ^You don't like that Superman has infinite potential?


No, what I don't like is people thinking that characters can magically ignore the consequences of absorbing massive amounts of energy.

It's perfectly fine whatever amount of energy Superman can absorb as long as they're aware of that.

quote:
Pre-DCnU is the best we have and there he had no limit to the amount he could absorb, this most likely didn't change.


Yet, we're given the set limit in Superman #13 for New 52 Superman. That proves that this Superman has his limits just like anyone else.

quote:
Accept the truth and go on.


That's not the truth that's just your personal opinion. Your entitled to it but it's just your opinion. Not a fact.

It's funny that people use conjectures in order to prove I am doing so.

Old Post Aug 31st, 2014 01:11 AM
Sharivan is currently offline Click here to Send Sharivan a Private Message Find more posts by Sharivan Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Prof. T.C McAbe
Kryptonian Scientist

Gender: Male
Location: BatCave

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Iskandar
No, what I don't like is people thinking that characters can magically ignore the consequences of absorbing massive amounts of energy.

It's perfectly fine whatever amount of energy Superman can absorb as long as they're aware of that.



Yet, we're given the set limit in Superman #13 for New 52 Superman. That proves that this Superman has his limits just like anyone else.



That's not the truth that's just your personal opinion. Your entitled to it but it's just your opinion. Not a fact.

It's funny that people use conjectures in order to prove I am doing so.


It's comics science, so there are no consequences, except evolution and power increase in Supermans case. the only one ignoring evidence is you tbh.

On the contrary, Superman #13 showed that even without the sun he can benchpress the earthweight for 5 straigth days and just breaks one sweat. So we don't know how much longer he could keep on going and it surely doesn't tell us what happens if he stays in the sun for a long time, how powerful he will become. The only thing we know 100% is that the sun makes his more powerful the more he absorbs, or the closer he comes. There is no limit for now.

Yes it is my opinion, but the evidence we have from his previous incarnations make my opinion more likely than yours.
So you are entitled to your own wink.


__________________


Sig made by my mate, the one and only One_Angry_Scot

Old Post Aug 31st, 2014 01:20 AM
Prof. T.C McAbe is currently offline Click here to Send Prof. T.C McAbe a Private Message Find more posts by Prof. T.C McAbe Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 09:10 AM.
Pages (2): [1] 2 »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Comic Book Forums » Comic Book 'Versus' Forum » Invincible, Omni Man, Thragg vs New 52 Superman, Supergirl

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.