Ancient Force Masters VS. Force Masters from ep I to NJO
I'm new here. But I saw that the general discussion in almost all themes is about the Ancient Lords and Jedi Masters of 6000-3900 years (BEFORE ep I) VS. ep I to NJO ones.
I didn't read New Jedi Order book, but I'm eager to do it.
I think that the ANCIENT masters were much more superior in all matters than the ones from the movies.
I wanna know your opinion!
Registered: May 2005
Location: A galaxy far, far away....
Although this has been discussed, it's a valid question. Yes, they're better, in terms of the Sith. As for the Jedi, that is unknown, seeing as we know harldy any ancient Jedi of note. The only reason the Sith were better, however, is because they were PURE SITH, and they were connected more directly to the Force - I believe this was the general consensus, although perhaps my view is flawed (Revan is an exception because he is just an incredibly powerful human - if he had lived later, I believe he would have been equally powerful).
Also, there are a great deal of NJO books, not just one, so you'd better get started, my new friend (and this thread might go well into the EU forum, just to let you know for the future, sir).
Anyway, my money is on Ancient Masters, Pre Ruusan. Its like comparing Jack Dempsey and say... Trevor Berbick. Older is generally better, as they had more practice and whatnot.
__________________ Proud Member of the New Jawa Order.
http://ecosyn.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/Gay_Holocaust/Queer_Nazis.html
-In memory of USH.
ya i think there were more ancients and if you think about it it would have to be that way. its all genetics like the midichlorian count goes down an down the more they mix blood so you know.
Jun 5th, 2005 08:43 PM
