Obviously, the "editor" for this video is highly biased in presentation, but the original video is there for you to judge yourself. Try to be objective.
Keep the "guns or no guns" argument in the proper thread.
Summary: Driver was pulled over on a known "prostitution" street, had a gun, had a conceal and carry license, and one of the officers got very upset at him for not revealing this fact sooner.
The driver tried, multiple times, to inform the officers that he had a conceal and carry but was flustered/ignored.
The officer said that he would not have lost any sleep if he had executed the gentleman right then and there. (That scene appears right around 13:30.)
This is a great example of conceal and carry laws posing problems for both sides.
1. What is your opinion on the video?
2. Is the officer wrong or should the conceal and carry licensee’s be required to be much more forceful in their proclamation?
3. What do you think about conceal and carry?
4. Does it really conflict with the first, second, and fifth amendments? (If you need a refresher, feel free to view them, here .)
"The Daemon lied with every breath. It could not help itself but to deceive and dismay, to riddle and ruin. The more we conversed, the closer I drew to one singularly ineluctable fact: I would gain no wisdom here."
I think you can CC anything you're able to CC. It would be pretty hard to get an MP5 anyway, H&K tends not to sell their military stuff to civilians no matter what.
__________________
Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 23rd, 2011 05:59 AM
