Just as email-gate looked to be winding down, RadarOnline.com has exclusively learned a person claiming to be a computer specialist has come forward with the stunning news that 32,000 emails from Hillary Clinton‘s private email account are up for sale. The price tag — a whopping $500,000!
Promising to give the trove of the former Secretary of State’s emails to the highest bidder, the specialist is showing subject lines as proof of what appear to be legitimate messages.
PHOTOS: Exposed! 10 New Revelations From Hillary Clinton’s Recently Released Emails — Overworked Staff And Guilty Pleasures!
“Hillary or someone from her camp erased the outbox containing her emails, but forgot to erase the emails that were in her sent box,” an insider reveals to Radar of the Presidential contender’s latest nightmare.
Radar has learned that some of the topics discussed in the email appear to include everything from Benghazi to the Algerian hostage crisis — with subject lines such as:
“H Libya security latest. Sid” (with attachment)
“H FYI, best analysis so far of hearing Sid,’ about the latest security
in Libya”
“H Algeria latest French Intel on Algeria hostage Sid”
“H Latest French Intel in Algeria hostage Sid” (with attachment)
“H Latest Libya intel internal govt discussions high level” (with
attachment)
“H HIGHLY IMPORTANT! Comprehensive Intel Report on (with attachment)”
Warns the insider, “If these emails get out to the public domain, not only is Hillary finished as a potential Presidential nominee, she could put our country’s national security at risk.”
It's a slippery slope now though. If people felt the Ashley Madison hackers had no right to do what they did they will especially feel this way about this.
But still: you know sooner or later someone is going to cough up that cash.
__________________ Chicken Boo, what's the matter with you? You don't act like the other chickens do. You wear a disguise to look like human guys, but you're not a man you're a Chicken Boo.
Better have some legit shit in it. Put this debate/argument to rest.
However, copies of these e-mails will not address a repudiation argument. Unless there is a chain of custody, associated hash, bit locking, encryption, and maintained authentication mechanisms, Hillary can deny all of it. The content of the e-mail would have to reveal enough specific information so that it can be corroborated to real world activities. In other words, an e-mail says she will go to place Y and meet person 1. Then we have documented proof that this happened. But the e-mail would have to confirm information that cannot be derived from aggregation from already available information.
This is a steep steep slope of burden of proof.
Edit - Figured out a path of non-repudiation: the recipients of those e-mails. If even a single e-mail (of the bad ones) can be found on a recipient's storage (and that storage is reasonably secure/has high integrity), then she cannot repudiate the content.
Considering the amount of money (millions) Clinton's emails would be worth to media outlets and wealthy Rightwingers, this seems like a scam to sucker someone into giving up a relatively small amount of money.
It's like that wealthy Nigerian Prince who only needs $500.00 USD from you to solve his troubles and then he'll pay you back tenfold. He will, seriously.
That is if this story itself just isn't a hoax and there is no legitimate attempt to cash-grab.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Dude, in the sub-headline of your very link: "Revelation is separate from debunked claims that a hacker had put Clinton's entire email collection on the market for $500,000 " ... that would be the debunked claim you made when making this thread.
As new details come out I post them, are you slow and or retarded, or do you think I intentionally try and hide stuff but then update new info coming out.
You do know a thing called "new details" right?
__________________
In order for any life to matter, we all have to matter
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I think you believe anything that confirms your biases whole heartedly, even if it comes from extremely questionable or easily debunked sources. And because of that often seem foolish and clueless.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Well, you don't though. You fell for the hoax completely, and to support that it wasn't a hoax you posted an article that in the very headline pointed out that what you had previously posted is a hoax. You are disingenuous and uninformed.
They wouldn't be worth millions. Wikileaks major leaks and Snowden's leaks didn't seem to have that much value and I assure you Clinton's leaks wouldn't be anything close to as "shocking" or "revealing" as those others.
KMC Community Forums
Sep 4th, 2015 05:13 PM
