KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Philosophy Forum » Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?

Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?
Started by: Storm

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
  Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Storm
Black belt BJJ

Gender: Female
Location:

Moderator

Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?

If you are trying to arrive at the most moral decision, should you seek to reason as impartially and objectively as possible, or should you allow your biases and personal, subjective preferences to play a role?

Source: about.com


__________________



I am not driven by people’ s praise and I am not slowed down by people’ s criticism.
You only live once. But if you live it right, once is enough. Wrong. We only die once, we live every day!
Make poverty history.

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 03:41 PM
Storm is currently offline Click here to Send Storm a Private Message Find more posts by Storm Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

Seeing as morales come from your own biases and personal, subjective preferences yes you should.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 03:44 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Janus Marius
Plo Koon Rulez!

Gender: Male
Location: Hiding from zombies

Re: Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Storm
If you are trying to arrive at the most moral decision, should you seek to reason as impartially and objectively as possible, or should you allow your biases and personal, subjective preferences to play a role?

Source: about.com


Morality must be objective to remove bias, because bias can distort the truth of things. I follow the simplest formula:

Intent > Action > Consequence.

For an act to be morally permissable, the Intent behind the action and the action must both be mroally good. The consequence can be good or bad. Case in point- Dictator tries to make the nation robust and strong. Good intent, but he seizes land from certain people and forces others into deathcamps or labor camps. Immoral. Therefore, the act itself is immoral. On the flip side, acts can be morally good but not produce good in the end. Take a doctor for instance: a doctor has the good intent to save a patient, and performs surgery which is good, but the patient still dies.

It really depends on if you buy into the irrational idea of consequentialism, which means do whatever so long as it produces good. Or subjectivism, which isn't much better.

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 04:15 PM
Janus Marius is currently offline Click here to Send Janus Marius a Private Message Find more posts by Janus Marius Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Mindship
Snap out of it.

Gender: Male
Location: Supersurfing

This strikes me as another way of asking, Are Morals Relative? (in which case, you would be allowed your subjectivities/biases); or, Are There Moral Absolutes? (in which case, moral action should be based on objective truths).

Since I believe in moral absolutes, moral action should reflect them...this includes taking context into account.


__________________

Shinier than a speeding bullet.

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 05:27 PM
Mindship is currently offline Click here to Send Mindship a Private Message Find more posts by Mindship Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Ushgarak
Paladin

Gender: Male
Location: Chelmsford, Essex, UK

Co-Admin

I can't help thinking Mindship is right- this is asking if morals are absolute, but from a different angle.


__________________



"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"

"You've never had any TINY bit of sex, have you?"

BtVS

Old Post Mar 16th, 2006 05:44 PM
Ushgarak is currently offline Click here to Send Ushgarak a Private Message Find more posts by Ushgarak Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Biscuit
yummy!

Gender: Female
Location: England

in my opinion there can be no complete impartiality where moral decisions are concerned because every situation is different. Most philosophers, when creating a moral theory, attempt to ignore emotions, but it is undeniable that personal emotions and motives play a big part in all moral decisions that we make, because of this, our personal decisions can only be subjective.


__________________
Dont let anyone tell you that you're wrong. If u believe it it's true.

Old Post Mar 30th, 2006 05:43 PM
Biscuit is currently offline Click here to Send Biscuit a Private Message Find more posts by Biscuit Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Storm
If you are trying to arrive at the most moral decision, should you seek to reason as impartially and objectively as possible, or should you allow your biases and personal, subjective preferences to play a role?

Source: about.com


I think there are no morals so, you can'T behave morally anyways. You will always do what suits you most anyways, so the question is kind of pointless.


__________________

Old Post Mar 30th, 2006 08:20 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

Re: Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Storm
If you are trying to arrive at the most moral decision, should you seek to reason as impartially and objectively as possible, or should you allow your biases and personal, subjective preferences to play a role?

Source: about.com


Yes, but you will alway have some biases and personal, subjective preferences no matter how hard to try to avoid that.


__________________

Old Post Mar 30th, 2006 08:51 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Atlantis001
The one without a name

Gender: Male
Location:

I think it is impossible to be totally impartial, in the moment we choose a criterium to judge the situation be it reason or not, we are already biased, or inclined towards that.


__________________

Last edited by Atlantis001 on Mar 31st, 2006 at 12:46 AM

Old Post Mar 31st, 2006 12:43 AM
Atlantis001 is currently offline Click here to Send Atlantis001 a Private Message Find more posts by Atlantis001 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Great Vengeance
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: United States

Morality is subjective...I dont think anyone can make a valid argument against this?

Old Post Mar 31st, 2006 04:12 AM
Great Vengeance is currently offline Click here to Send Great Vengeance a Private Message Find more posts by Great Vengeance Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 01:07 PM.
  Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Philosophy Forum » Must Moral Actions Be Impartial?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.