Gender: Unspecified Location: REALM OF THE UNDERWORLD
I brought it in to support and strengthen my argument - having somewhat the potential to destroy the universe, we’ll that lies in the realm of his full capabilities and that is what I’m trying to subvert; by diminishing it’s supposed destructive force, introducing contradictory term and closing all perceive intricacies to that ability.
I’m making it so that coin toss up equates to 0 all the time by removing that so called Big Bang attack to the equation.
But even if you toss a normal coin 100,000 times and you somehow got heads every single time, the 100,001th time you have a 50/50 chance of getting tails. Or......
Another way of thinking about it, is tossing a coin and it landing on its edge.
Super unlikely, right? But it is CAPABLE of landing on its edge. Which is what I am arguing.
Firestorm is capable of destroying the universe. A coin is capable of landing on its edge. Just because both scenarios are unlikely, is moot.
Put it this way. Your mistake is in assuming I'm saying it's a legit tactic for FS to pull off mid battle.
I am NOT saying that. When I say he's capable of doing it, I'm saying he has the ability to do it. Whether it be conscious, a one in a million freak occurrence, doesn't matter.
Gender: Unspecified Location: REALM OF THE UNDERWORLD
Here let me put it this way, that coin your tossing is a two face! No matter how many X’s you tossed it, it’s going to land the same. That’s what I’m trying to point at by removing that Big Bang attack to FS full potential equation.
To get you to see that, you need to answer the question below.
Is it unreasonable to suggest that if it's a one in a million freak occurrence in comics, then it has a one in a million chance of being relevant to this versus thread?