The one who only complains about someone being arrogant, is when one is affected by it. How to not be affected by it?? One must just follow the rules to accept the truth.
...."Truth only hurts if you are living in a lie"....
one can have an opinion on a matter without being affected by it. Like I have an opinion on the re election of president Bush but that he got elected really doesnt affect me too much.
So I have an definition on arrogance, I also have a personal definition about dictators too without they affect me a bit
again dont have to affected to have an definition for arrogance.
If someone ask me how to define arrogance ass hole would be my answer due to how arrogant people behave. One can be a bystander and watch without taking a part and still have an opinion on the matter
"Courageous, untroubled, mocking and violent-that is what Wisdom wants us to be. Wisdom is a woman, and loves only a warrior. "
- Isnt that like saying wisdom is a forbidden fruit? (leave it be or become corrupt)
"Egoism is the very essence of a noble soul."
-Doubtful.. courage is the essence of a noble soul, IMO.. you dont get anywhere in the world by telling people how cool you are.. but saving someones life (whether you put yours on the line to do so) is extraordinarily noble
"He that humbleth himself wishes to be exalted."
-Then 'he' was not truely humble... the truely humble stick to their word... mind, body and soul. Hipocrisy is not the foundation of a humble man.
i dont know those reindeer since norway is the worlds supplier of reindeer THEY MIGHT BE WMD who knows you crazy norwedgians might try to send us suicidal reindeer bombs
Hey finti, you havn't once come up with your own original philosophical idea, are you too scared people will criticise you? What are you doing in a philosophy forum when you merely criticise other people's opinions, give us your own one to prove yourself.
pff.. you dont have the intellectual capacity to make presumputous judgements (clearly made by your constant condescending towards others.. truely the quality of a fool in genius' clothing).. things are put on this earth to be questioned, regardless of who they came from
I prefer to say fool, because you ignore people who may potentially be interested in exploring philosophy in a deeper sense.. Im sure (as someone who is practically deeming themself as a representative of the type of people who are involved in this branch of studies).. it does become very dismal to think that all your group of colleagues might do is stand around and call eachother idiots all day long.. I never asked you to simplify your theories 'for me'... yet again more presuming.. you should write a book about presuming.. I'm sure you could go on and on
KMC Community Forums
Jan 17th, 2005 02:56 PM
