Spidey and Nightcrawler. Spidey cant actually be hit if he always followed his spider-sense. Nightcrawler can be wherever he wants to be but he runs a risk of being hit by something.........
actually i would put nightcrawler slightly above spidey cuz A. he can also stick to walls B. he has a prehensile tail that gives him an unfair advantage.
my earlier point with Beast was to show that for a guy that massive to be almost on the same tier with spidey "proprtionately" he is better, but on the other hand, agility is just agilty. you cant look at a guy who has no sticking to surfaces ability yet , can hang upside down by his toes, punch hand and foot holds in the walls with his bare hands and feet and incoprporates leaping and acrobatics in his fighting style and say that he's on a lower level. the only reason why spidey gets the nod is becuase he's the one out there every single night swinging around manhattan while beast and kurt only shine when the xmen are in battle
Gender: Male Location: Kicking pigs out of the screen.
I've done this before.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Kurt has the better body for acrobating, but spiderman has the speed, and agility. Kurt is very close, but in the sake of bars and swings, Kurt would be more flashy as he can grip with his feet, and tail.
Spiderman would do better in events that require a long jump or great feat of strength to get to one place or another, but he's close with Kurt, but has versatility that leads me to believe he's #1
I know it involves dexterity, it just depends on what feats you are talking about, its like gymnastics. Spiderman has the greater strength and could do these spins and flips many times no doubt, as well as Kurt.
For instance I think Spidermans greatest point is his start, he would get a good launch, hang (strength), have a faster movement, and get more times to spin and twist and flip. His landing would be better than others but not Kurt, though I'm sure he would be the only to land on one hand from a really high fall.
Kurt would be strong in his finishes. His start, wouldn't be as strong as spidermans, but he would make up for it, with his natural grace, and adaptivity to cling to surfaces with his tails and hands, ideal for bars and such. He does not have the strength to do what spidey could do for as long, but he adept and BORN to do it.
Spiderman acrobatics were a gift, Kurts were his birthright, but I think strength would give him the opportunity to catch the air in his ascent of his jumps.
I agree with parts of it and I understand those terms fine , Agility=dexterity in movement basically, or adroitness in movement regardless spiderman just has the body necessary to take this, his abilites make up for his experience, in some aspects he is no rookie.
Spiderman does things better than some of the most experienced at times, its close between him and Kurt.
Beast and nightcrawler are actually very similar in that aspect.
If there's teleport there's webbing too.
Basically its down to the same, spidey's "lack of experience" but better abilites, versus the more experienced. Though he doesn't have any formal training, spiderman is no fool in agility and obstacles nor moving gracefully. Regardless the first thing u think of with spiderman is dodging and gracefullness.
Agility is nice, but feats like this require, exceptional strength as well. The bicep,tricep, latissimus dorsi(back, upper and outer), and middle and upper trapezius(neck and imbetween shoulders), are used here, spiderman could easily do it, and if you removed that goofy costume, he could probably do an episode with peter beating Kurt at his own game, after all , Kurt was impressed byPeter's agility before.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Spider-Man : most agile. NC and Beast are wrestling for the second place.
__________________ The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.
KMC Community Forums
Aug 2nd, 2005 12:46 AM
