Originally posted by xmarksthespotYou know this was never intended as a general thread... [/B][/QUOTE] Was it not? (massive sarcasm here!!!)
[QUOTE=5300815]Originally posted by wannabe
[B]WOW!!!
A general thread, started by wolwerine8888, has turned into a "Wolverine vs."-thread...AGAIN!
Who would have thought?
🙄
Originally posted by xmarksthespotSOOO true from my point of view!
Meh... it doesn't really matter. I'd wager the whole point of this thread was to somehow get Wolverine into a top ten of X-Men strengths.
actauly it was not I relay wanted to know who was the storngest to weakest in pure strength of all the x-men. by the way pylocke is in fact extremely strong if she puts her powers into it same with racheal and jean. there easiliy over 20 tons. warren on the other hand is peak and is under wolverine in strength. I not sure what current jugg strength is but I think he may infact be weaker then colossus.
I also thing that night cralwer may in fact be stronger then scot and havok.
wolverine doesn't have superhuman strength. handbooks dont mean jack shit when it comes to listing strength levels. they gave blink a 7 in terms of speed, just because she can teleport. her teleporting might be "instantaneous," but marking that as "warp speed" is a misnomer. you show me a panel of wolverine hoisting a weight akin to the untold tons of rubble on archangel shown in the "alpha mutants" thread, and i'll consider your point. until then, i hate to be the bearer of bad news, BUT WOLVERINE DOES NOT HAVE SUPERHUMAN STRENGTH.
and nightcrawler has no enhanced musculature, so his physical strength depends purely on the size of his muscles. and he falls far short of cyclops or havok when it comes to that.