KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » No guns = Better world ?

No guns = Better world ?
Started by: grey fox

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (8): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
Do you honestly believe that removing modern day weapons would stop us from fighting wars?


No. Not what I said though, is it?


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:23 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Darth Godzilla
Your Lord and Master

Gender: Male
Location:

Guns don't kill people.
People kill people.

Get rid of all the people. Problem solved.



BTW, guns are needed for population control. Maybe some1 who was killed by a gun was going to get an alien disease that could have wiped out the planet, but because he was shot we were all saved.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:34 PM
Darth Godzilla is currently offline Click here to Send Darth Godzilla a Private Message Find more posts by Darth Godzilla Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
No. Not what I said though, is it?


No but you did say less people would die in wars and in less painful ways, or at the very least equally painful which I just don't see happening. Mass fighting with huge army's against another huge army would kill far more people then modern day conflicts.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:35 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
No but you did say less people would die in wars and in less painful ways, or at the very least equally painful which I just don't see happening. Mass fighting with huge army's against another huge army would kill far more people then modern day conflicts.


No, I would say it would decrease the total death rate. Which I am standing by.

I won't claim it will be less painful. I don't know.

But if we just have sticks less people will die.

End of le story.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:37 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
No, I would say it would decrease the total death rate. Which I am standing by.

I won't claim it will be less painful. I don't know.

But if we just have sticks less people will die.

End of le story.


Sticks perhaps, but without guns we'd still have bows and swords... I'd rather be in a war with guns then in a war with those.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:41 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
Sticks perhaps, but without guns we'd still have bows and swords... I'd rather be in a war with guns then in a war with those.


I'd rather have an army with sticks marching at me than a nuclear warhead.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:49 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
I'd rather have an army with sticks marching at me than a nuclear warhead.


The possibility of total destruction does of course exist with modern day army's. But the far more controlled destruction that happens most of the time with the incredibly small risk of total destruction is still preferable to me then a full out war with medieval or ancient technology....

Sticks might do, but they would still hurt like hell... Less casualty's though seeing as you probably wouldn't have the time to beat most people to dead because there are others you need to fight. And when the battle is over you probably don't have the energy to kill everybody that's still breathing.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:52 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
The possibility of total destruction does of course exist with modern day army's. But the far more controlled destruction that happens most of the time with the incredibly small risk of total destruction is still preferable to me then a full out war with medieval or ancient technology....

Sticks might do, but they would still hurt like hell... Less casualty's though seeing as you probably wouldn't have the time to beat most people to dead because there are others you need to fight. And when the battle is over you probably don't have the energy to kill everybody that's still breathing.


Point one. Also if your neighbour has a gun and hates you and can kill you easily he might do it sooner than beating you with a stick to death, seeing as you have better chances to protect yourself.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 08:53 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
Point one. Also if your neighbour has a gun and hates you and can kill you easily he might do it sooner than beating you with a stick to death, seeing as you have better chances to protect yourself.


This is true, on the other hand the chance of my neighbor having a gun is really small. And still even if he would and he would kill me that would still not relate to the total amount of deaths in an average medieval or ancient battle....


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:01 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
grey fox
KMC Magik Founder

Gender: Male
Location: Britain

My initial idea for this thread was that without the simplicity of 'Point click' that a gun gives crime rates would drop as it takes more skill to utilise a sword (Though the ideas of army's marching to war with sticks and stones got a good lol out of me) then it does to fire a pistol.

It would be an interesting conflict though , oh and no other tech is reduced. We still have current medical knowledge and all that Jazz .


__________________
..................

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:14 PM
grey fox is currently offline Click here to Send grey fox a Private Message Find more posts by grey fox Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
This is true, on the other hand the chance of my neighbor having a gun is really small. And still even if he would and he would kill me that would still not relate to the total amount of deaths in an average medieval or ancient battle....


You think? I dunno, I think modern Battles kinda top the medieval ones extremely.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:15 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by grey fox
My initial idea for this thread was that without the simplicity of 'Point click' that a gun gives crime rates would drop as it takes more skill to utilise a sword (Though the ideas of army's marching to war with sticks and stones got a good lol out of me) then it does to fire a pistol.

It would be an interesting conflict though , oh and no other tech is reduced. We still have current medical knowledge and all that Jazz .


Well it would as first, as well as the amount of wars and the amount of people that would die in them, but that will only last for a small period of time. Eventually we'll learn again.

quote:

You think? I dunno, I think modern Battles kinda top the medieval ones extremely.


Well look at the war in Afghanistan for instance, or the last Gulf War... Far more peaceful then conquests of Ghenghis Khan, Atilla the Hun, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar or whatever... Battle's there killed thousands, no entire wars kill hundreds...

Then again the aftermath of the conflict kills a lot of people, I have no idea how it was in those days so perhaps the Iraqi war would have taken less lives if swords and bows would still have been the primary weapons.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Last edited by Fishy on Dec 24th, 2006 at 09:18 PM

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:16 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Quiero Mota

Gender: Male
Location: The 623

Re: No guns = Better world ?

No.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:19 PM
Quiero Mota is currently offline Click here to Send Quiero Mota a Private Message Find more posts by Quiero Mota Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
JacopeX
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: Everywhere

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
We'll just beat the shit out of each other and use natural resources like rocks and wood to kill others... Removing weapons will just make people die in a more painful way.
War is what causes us to go through pain and suffering in many ways. When I say no weaponds, I ment to give out to any citizen. That is why Gun safety is complete bullshit. You can buy guns anywhere and they can shoot anyone.


__________________
(MEMBER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

The more you question it, the less you will understand.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:20 PM
JacopeX is currently offline Click here to Send JacopeX a Private Message Find more posts by JacopeX Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
Well it would as first, as well as the amount of wars and the amount of people that would die in them, but that will only last for a small period of time. Eventually we'll learn again.



Well look at the war in Afghanistan for instance, or the last Gulf War... Far more peaceful then conquests of Ghenghis Khan, Atilla the Hun, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar or whatever... Battle's there killed thousands, no entire wars kill hundreds...

Then again the aftermath of the conflict kills a lot of people, I have no idea how it was in those days so perhaps the Iraqi war would have taken less lives if swords and bows would still have been the primary weapons.


Well, you are comparing this latest small one with the greatest ever though.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:21 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, you are comparing this latest small one with the greatest ever though.


I don't really consider Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan Project Russia, WWII or WWI to be modern day conflicts... Although that would depend in how far in history you would be willing to call modern.

If you would look however from the start of gunpowder till now then you are definitely right. If you would look at like me from the fall of the wall till now then casualty's are a lot lower


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:26 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
I don't really consider Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan Project Russia, WWII or WWI to be modern day conflicts... Although that would depend in how far in history you would be willing to call modern.

If you would look however from the start of gunpowder till now then you are definitely right. If you would look at like me from the fall of the wall till now then casualty's are a lot lower


Well, no major conflicts since then. And Iraqis lost a good amount of blood. Don't underestimate that.

Also, comparing 10 years to 1000 I dunno.


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:39 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Fishy
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: The Netherlands

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Bardock42
Well, no major conflicts since then. And Iraqis lost a good amount of blood. Don't underestimate that.

Also, comparing 10 years to 1000 I dunno.


Not to a thousand years but the way wars were fought back then, wars are fought differently now then they were 20, 30, 40, 50 & 60 years ago... Back then it was more mass destruction now it's more minimal damage and minimal loss of life. I guess it just looks at how you want to look at it.


__________________


Thanks TWelling4Ever

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:44 PM
Fishy is currently offline Click here to Send Fishy a Private Message Find more posts by Fishy Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Bardock42
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Fishy
Not to a thousand years but the way wars were fought back then, wars are fought differently now then they were 20, 30, 40, 50 & 60 years ago... Back then it was more mass destruction now it's more minimal damage and minimal loss of life. I guess it just looks at how you want to look at it.


Not because of the weapons though. But because of the different state of mind.

You think if the weapins had been available to Hitler he wouldn't have used them? Also, you think if we all had sticks nowwe would go back to that mentality?


__________________

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 09:48 PM
Bardock42 is currently offline Click here to Send Bardock42 a Private Message Find more posts by Bardock42 Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Rogue Jedi
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location: On my way to the Cage

Account Restricted

ideally, in my opinion, the only people with guns should be cops and soldiers.


__________________

All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.

Old Post Dec 24th, 2006 10:03 PM
Rogue Jedi is currently offline Click here to Send Rogue Jedi a Private Message Find more posts by Rogue Jedi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 02:42 AM.
Pages (8): « 1 [2] 3 4 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » No guns = Better world ?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.