Leave the Conspiracy Theorists alone, kids...

Started by Symmetric Chaos3 pages

Re: Leave the Conspiracy Theorists alone, kids...

[QUOTE=8549669]Originally posted by Blaxican
In all honesty what point do we have trying to put the various Theorists in here down? Is this not the Conspiracy forum, a place for you to post conspiracies? I notice a lot of people coming in here just to point out how stupid these people and there conspiracies are. Who are we to tell them to stop posting conspiracies in the conspiracy forum?

If you really think all of there conspiracy stuff is BS then just ignore this part of the forum. That's what this forum was created for, right? So the GDF and OTF wouldn't get cluttered with this stuff? [/QUOTE

You're trying to silence us because of your world conquering agenda.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Well, 2 claps for XYZ. 2 paragraphs, one that he just wrote a week or so or ago, and another from who knows when.

Here is a better question. WHEN THE HELL HAVE U POSTED SOMETHING RELATED TO CONSPIRACY SINCE I'VE BEEN WATCHING HERE FOR MONTHS!!!! lol.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
I got a little game for everyone.

Take a look at all of the threads made by XYZ in this forum on page 1. Starting from the first to last.

How many of them have anything to do with trying to present a valid conspiracy theory?

Answer: Almost NONE!

How many of them have to do with attacking REAL conspiracy theorists?

Answer: Almost Every Single One!

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
Awww. How sweet of you to support Deano Lord. In fact, what a 360 degree turn from the Lord XYZ I know of below:

Now thats the LordXYZ I know.

You don't see cockroaches pretending to be bunnyrabbits do you Lord?

No comparison..... just a question.

Originally posted by NuclearWinter
You aren't a conspiracy theorist Lord. You're a false authority. There is a difference.

You do realize that there's an "edit" button, don't you?

Originally posted by Spartan005
You do realize that there's an "edit" button, don't you?
I already told him this, his responce was he forgets and posts after the 15 minute limit.
This error is too frequent to say he forgets. Instead he simply doesn't bother. That's my opinion anyway.

Originally posted by Rohangiga
yes some people really do give them a bad image like sparton005 sayin that an alien ubducted him and made him have butt sex with him

This must be a joke. He was obviously making fun, or did that go over your head?

Originally posted by Rohangiga
yes some people really do give them a bad image like sparton005 sayin that an alien ubducted him and made him have butt sex with him

*kills self*

Originally posted by Spartan005
*kills self*
From laughing too hard? Or did you commit suicide out of disgust or disappointment?

Originally posted by lord xyz
From laughing too hard? Or did you commit suicide out of disgust or disappointment?

A bit of both actually 👆

Originally posted by lord xyz
brought down by... a controlled demolition. See, I'm not as gullible as the rest of you.

Then can you explain why they fell like a building does during a demolition. According to the FEMA, the building went through a "Pancake Collapse". You mind posting the science behind that?

infact, XYZ answer in this thread http://www.killermovies.com/forums/445315_1-can-someone-please-prove-the-official-version-of-911

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Then can you explain why they fell like a building does during a demolition. According to the FEMA, the building went through a "Pancake Collapse". You mind posting the science behind that?

They were designed to collapse like that. Buildings that tall are not designed so as to collapse sideways and take out entire city blocks. The two towers were designed to fall straight down to reduce damage to nearby buildings.

Mind explaining why the towers shouldn't have collapsed like that?

Originally posted by J-Beowulf
They were designed to collapse like that. Buildings that tall are not designed so as to collapse sideways and take out entire city blocks. The two towers were designed to fall straight down to reduce damage to nearby buildings.

Where is this said, please offer a source.
And, since when are buildings designed to collapse?

And, to answer your question, it should not have fallen like that because there is no way for floors to fall on floors in a progressive fashion, get smashed into into pieces that fly out of windows and still maintain it's velocity I.E. how did the collapse reach terminal velocity while having it's mass objectively changed?

EDIT: if your going to respond, please do it in the new thread I made.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
And, since when are buildings designed to collapse?

All skyscrapers are designed with potential structural collapse in mind. If they weren't they would have to be placed the distance of their height aeay from each other. Stop reading conspicay websites and research architecture.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
All skyscrapers are designed with potential structural collapse in mind. If they weren't they would have to be placed the distance of their height aeay from each other. Stop reading conspicay websites and research architecture.

I'm aware that but, the claim that the towers were designed to pancake is just plain false.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
I'm aware that but, the claim that the towers were designed to pancake is just plain false.

yeah people need to stop living in a fantasy world that the towers collapsed due to fire.Its funny how you can view videos of where demolition experts have set off explosives to blow up buildings and in all those videos they show the same thing that the buildings topple down in a freefall manner in the same EXACT way the towers fell.Yet people cant deal with it that they were lied to,that the towers fell due to explosives going off.Pitiful. 🙄

thats hysterical on his flimsy point about architecture.That means nothing because it was the first time in history that a scyscraper collapsed due to fire even though the other towers were subjected to far more intense heat and burned for hours without collapsing.Not only that,you can also view pics of those buildings where bombs were set off to bring down the buildings and the place looks like a war zone,you view pics of skyscrapers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes,those buildings remained intact and collapsed sideways,yet the in new york,you view all the photos of the towers collapse,in just like the photos of buildings that blown up,new york looks like a war zone as well unlike the towers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes.some people just dont want to learn the truth though.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
yeah people need to stop living in a fantasy world that the towers collapsed due to fire.Its funny how you can view videos of where demolition experts have set off explosives to blow up buildings and in all those videos they show the same thing that the buildings topple down in a freefall manner in the same EXACT way the towers fell.Yet people cant deal with it that they were lied to,that the towers fell due to explosives going off.Pitiful. 🙄

thats hysterical on his flimsy point about architecture.That means nothing because it was the first time in history that a scyscraper collapsed due to fire even though the other towers were subjected to far more intense heat and burned for hours without collapsing.Not only that,you can also view pics of those buildings where bombs were set off to bring down the buildings and the place looks like a war zone,you view pics of skyscrapers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes,those buildings remained intact and collapsed sideways,yet the in new york,you view all the photos of the towers collapse,in just like the photos of buildings that blown up,new york looks like a war zone as well unlike the towers in california that collapsed due to earthquakes.some people just dont want to learn the truth though.

1) It was not just fire that caused the collapse, you have a Boeing 767 flying 500 mph into the side of the building. Certainly you consider that when arguing about the forces that caused the collapse? Oh wait, you didn't. Apparently it's not important enough.

2)Call my opinions pitiful all you want, if it makes you feel better. Just fyi, I could care less what you think. This from the guy who is always criticizing others for resorting to insults?

3) An Earthquake did not bring down the towers, a Boeing 767 flying 500 mph slamming into the side of the tower and the subsequent burning of the jet fuel did. Don't compare apples to oranges, please.

4) A warzone? Elaborate please. What did you expect, exactly? Two neat piles of debris? Of course the area is going to look like a warzone. Two towers each over 1,000 feet tall collapsing can do that to an area, especially a congested area like a city.

5) Enough with your "people don't want to learn the truth" crap. It's your opinion, nothing else. Because I don't think like you doesn't mean I'm wrong; I have my opinions.

I do have to thank the Conspiracy Theorists for one thing...

They've given me the topic to an essay I have to write, which I will write about how stupid the 9-11 conspiracies are. vin

I hate them when they say we don't want to learn the truth,Well bullshit, we just don't believe in your shit. But I do believe in the conspiracy of 9/11.

Anyway I am new here but PARKER HAS PISSED ME OFF ALREADY.

Oops sorry for caps but they are rather fitting.

Originally posted by Captain REX
I do have to thank the Conspiracy Theorists for one thing...

They've given me the topic to an essay I have to write, which I will write about how stupid the 9-11 conspiracies are. vin

kinda like how stupid the governments 9-11 conspiracy is that it was Muslins and Bin Laden behind it and George Bush is innocent of all this. 😛 thats the stupid 9-11 conspiracy you should write about.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
I'm aware that but, the claim that the towers were designed to pancake is just plain false.

Exactly.