Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?

Started by Master Crimzon4 pages

Re: Re: Re: Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?

Originally posted by Mindship
God's gonna protect his home team, absolutely (otherwise why pick them in the first place? why have a Bible?). But is that because the Jews were, somehow, already "special," or did the Jews become special because they became God's home team?

Abraham made a pact with God over a big ritual. Lots of promises were given to Abraham about the future of his dynasty, if he continued to uphold and glorify god's beliefs in his original form (today, it's called Judaism). So, in a sense, God supposedly blessed the Jewish people and granted them the ability to be closest to him and to constantly be favored by him.

This is- no matter how you look at it- a method of self-glorification; 'God chose us to be his people. We're right and we're closest to him.'

The old Bible continues with many examples on how Jews were directly favored over other religions, with zero consideration for other lives. If you'd want, I could give you actual examples of such things happening.

Originally posted by Mindship
Perhaps I take too much to heart how Rabbi Hillel put it, about the essence of Judaism: "What you don't like, don't do to others. Everything else is commentary." This for me, with any 'true faith,' is a key difference between being religious and being religionistic.

Yeah, it is.

Allow me to go into a rant. Judaism is different at its core from both Islam and Christianity, in the sense that it is not a missionary religion. Judaism doesn't attempt to convert other people to it, nor does it commit conquest in the name of God, unlike Islam or Christianity, which both encourage the same act.

This is not to say that this vital difference was not, in certain cases, bad to the survival of the Jews. Throughout the entirety of history, the Jews all over the world were secluded. They inbred continuously and constantly emphasized themselves as different people. Can all the racism and bigotry against Jews throughout history be blamed on other religions? Judaism never, to the best of my knowledge, truly attempted to fit in with another society. Why is that? Their beliefs are not all that different than the beliefs of other monotheistic religions.

I believe that this is an example of a dooming 'holier than thou' attitude. Jews believe that they had been blessed by god, that they are following the path of Abraham- a path that was created by god, instigated by god, and 'endorsed' by god. And that god favors the Jews above all others. And so this resulted in the Jews forming a community that is clearly distinguishable from the mainstream community at the time- a 'superior' community in their eyes.

No, Judaism did not cause nearly as much destruction or death as either Islam or Christianity. But they, in some form, caused immense harm and destruction to themselves, and, even today, the topic of religion and Judaism gets in the way of negotiations with the Arabs.

Originally posted by Mindship
To put it broadly: "If there's such a loving God, why is there so much suffering in the world?" Always a good conversation starter, that.

Not quite, actually. You said 'Judaism kept a nation together and it eventually paid off.' I say, 'Would it have been so bad had Judaism dissolved into the other religions?', and then I gave examples of why that might have prevented conflict.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
I believe that this is an example of a dooming 'holier than thou' attitude. Jews believe that [b]they had been blessed by god, that they are following the path of Abraham- a path that was created by god, instigated by god, and 'endorsed' by god. And that god favors the Jews above all others. And so this resulted in the Jews forming a community that is clearly distinguishable from the mainstream community at the time- a 'superior' community in their eyes.[/B]

As opposed to all those other religions that say, "Hey folks we're a nice alternative but those other people could be right."?

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Abraham made a pact with God over a big ritual. Lots of promises were given to Abraham about the future of his dynasty, if he continued to uphold and glorify god's beliefs in his original form (today, it's called Judaism). So, in a sense, God supposedly blessed the Jewish people and granted them the ability to be closest to him and to constantly be favored by him.

This is- no matter how you look at it- a method of self-glorification; 'God chose us to be his people. We're right and we're closest to him.'

I understand all of what you're saying. Yes, Biblically speaking, the Jews have been favored. I only maintain that it's because the Jewish people were assigned a special task: this is what made them favored. Nothing inherent/decided by God beforehand. Just, somebody had to be picked. To see otherwise: that would be self-glorification. A truly pious individual does not see him/herself as superior, regardless of task assigned. If anything, they humble themselves before the weight of their responsibility.

Allow me to go into a rant. Judaism is different at its core from both Islam and Christianity, in the sense that it is not a missionary religion. Judaism doesn't attempt to convert other people to it, nor does it commit conquest in the name of God, unlike Islam or Christianity...
Interesting you should mention that. Maimonedes' idea was that since Judaism doesn't proselytize, it had to 'transform' in a way. Christianity and Islam, therefore, became like Judaism's missionary arms, reaching out to spread the Word (albeit, not in the nicest fashion).

This is not to say that this vital difference was not, in certain cases, bad to the survival of the Jews. Throughout the entirety of history, the Jews all over the world were secluded. They inbred continuously and constantly emphasized themselves as different people. Can all the racism and bigotry against Jews throughout history be blamed on other religions? Judaism never, to the best of my knowledge, truly attempted to fit in with another society. Why is that? Their beliefs are not all that different than the beliefs of other monotheistic religions.

I believe that this is an example of a dooming 'holier than thou' attitude. Jews believe that [b]they had been blessed by god, that they are following the path of Abraham- a path that was created by god, instigated by god, and 'endorsed' by god. And that god favors the Jews above all others. And so this resulted in the Jews forming a community that is clearly distinguishable from the mainstream community at the time- a 'superior' community in their eyes.

No, Judaism did not cause nearly as much destruction or death as either Islam or Christianity. But they, in some form, caused immense harm and destruction to themselves, and, even today, the topic of religion and Judaism gets in the way of negotiations with the Arabs. [/B]

My only comment here is that the final responsibility for a person's behavior (or group of people) rests with that person/group. Eg, Could the Jews have done more to protect themselves during, say, the Holocaust, as in pretending to be Christian? Absolutely. But their pride (and their sense of 'being special'😉 discouraged them from doing so. But the final responsibility for Germany's behavior rests with Germany.

Not quite, actually. You said 'Judaism kept a nation together and it eventually paid off.' I say, 'Would it have been so bad had Judaism dissolved into the other religions?', and then I gave examples of why that might have prevented conflict.
I said the Jewish people's faith in God and His Plan helped them to survive times of hardship, and that what you had posted was a more specific example of the Loving God/Suffering in the World paradox. I also maintain that given all the persecution throughout history of a small, dispersed minority, there must be something with strong survival values in Judaism, otherwise the Jews would've been wiped out long ago.

Clearly, as an Israeli, you have a perspective on this - and very strong feelings - that I can only understand as an American Jew. You make excellent points, but I can't help but feel your POV is mostly a reaction to all the religionism you must see. On the same token, I have my bias, perhaps viewing the story of the Jewish people (and religion in general) in a more idealistic light.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
As opposed to all those other religions that say, "Hey folks we're a nice alternative but those other people could be right."?

As I've said; Judaism caused far less destruction than Islam or Christianity. That being said, it did- due to the feeling of self-importance- bring much of the destruction upon itself, due to lack of efforts to integrate into the mainstream community.

Of course the actions committed by the other religions are far more evil and destructive. But the Jewish attitude is far from saintly.

Originally posted by Mindship
I understand all of what you're saying. Yes, Biblically speaking, the Jews have been favored. I only maintain that it's because the Jewish people were assigned a special task: this is what made them favored. Nothing inherent/decided by God beforehand. Just, somebody had to be picked. To see otherwise: that would be self-glorification. A truly pious individual does not see him/herself as superior, regardless of task assigned. If anything, they humble themselves before the weight of their responsibility.

That's not the 'Jewish attitude' (hey, I've invented a new term! 😛). Yeah, you're one of the Jews who does not see themselves as superior, which is great. You're not the source of the problem. Y'see, the Bible- at least the old (and Jewish) one- maintains the idea that God favors the Jews over other religions. Why is that? Because of a promise made by Abraham. They were in a sense, given a task, but I am operating on the belief that the Bible is a fictional book written by a fallible mortal. If this is true, than clearly what that person teaches is that Judaism is a task from god, and committing that task made them superior to other religions. So it's as thus; if you're a practicing Jew, you get treatment above other people.

The events in the book of Judges supports what I am trying to say. It is basically a singular book divided into multiple 'serialized' stories with virtually the same plot; the Jews have control of Israel, they sin, an invader attacks, conquers Israel, the Jews pray, God sends a human being (a Judge) to unite the Israelis and kill the invader. As you can see, the plot is as I've described above; the moment they start sinning, they lose God's favor, but the instant they start practicing Judaism again, God essentially kills the invader for them. Directly showing bias in favor of Jews.

The departure of the slaves from Egypt is also an example. While what God did was clearly just, think about it... after the Israelis crossed the desert, they were given God's power to kill the current inhabitants of Israel and make it their own country.

The Bible constantly maintains, implies, and displays the superiority of the 'Believing Jew' over other people.

Originally posted by Mindship
Interesting you should mention that. Maimonedes' idea was that since Judaism doesn't proselytize, it had to 'transform' in a way. Christianity and Islam, therefore, became like Judaism's missionary arms, reaching out to spread the Word (albeit, not in the nicest fashion).

Yeah. Religious conquest is ultimately religion's biggest problem and fault.

Originally posted by Mindship
My only comment here is that the final responsibility for a person's behavior (or group of people) rests with that person/group. Eg, Could the Jews have done more to protect themselves during, say, the Holocaust, as in pretending to be Christian? Absolutely. But their pride (and their sense of 'being special'😉 discouraged them from doing so. But the final responsibility for Germany's behavior rests with Germany.

Of course Germany's problem lies with Germany. What the Nazis did is assault a helpless minority, simply because they made an easy scapegoat.

The problem with the Jews... they made it too easy to cast them as the scapegoat. They constantly displayed themselves as a separate society, refusing to merge or to associate with the mainstream German people. Why? Well, the Bible certainly encourages the beliefs the Jews will always get special treatment, and that their way is the right way and the way of god. This leads to a possible feeling of superiority among the Jews.

You want a modern example of the Jewish superiority complex? One of my teachers- who I, incidentally, have great respect for (despite his clear right-wing views)- noted that the Jews always had a disproportionate amount of people within the intellectual and influential subjects of the world; philosophy, science, literature. This is very much true. Then, I asked him "So... do you honestly think Jews are smarter than everybody else?". He didn't give me a straight answer, but he did seem to imply that he considers the fact that we Jews may be smarter than everybody else. Pure bullshit.

Originally posted by Mindship
I said the Jewish people's faith in God and His Plan helped them to survive times of hardship, and that what you had posted was a more specific example of the Loving God/Suffering in the World paradox. I also maintain that given all the persecution throughout history of a small, dispersed minority, there must be something with strong survival values in Judaism, otherwise the Jews would've been wiped out long ago.

You're correct. I'll simplify my opinion on why the Jews survived so long, against tremendous odds; the keeping of the Sabbath's holiness. This created a way to keep the Jews from spreading into chaos and disorder, and create a form of unity among all of these Jews- a simple tradition kept them together as a single nation.

However, all I'm asking is thus; had the Jews converter into Christianity, or made greater attempts to merge into the mainstream society, would things have been so bad? Yes, it is possible that there would be no country of Israel at the moment. But think about the conflict it would have prevented.

Very difficult question, honestly.

Originally posted by Mindship
Clearly, as an Israeli, you have a perspective on this - and very strong feelings - that I can only understand as an American Jew. You make excellent points, but I can't help but feel your POV is mostly a reaction to all the religionism you must see. On the same token, I have my bias, perhaps viewing the story of the Jewish people (and religion in general) in a more idealistic light.

You make a lot of good points too. Pretty tough-provoking.

You know, it's funny. One would think that Israeli Jews- such as myself- would be more close to their religion than American Jews. Studied prove entirely different; American Jews are actually more religious and traditional, in general. I believe this is because that, as an Israeli, we are constantly exposed to the harmful effects of excessive religionism. So it's no wonder I'm more alienated with religion than you are.

By the way, are you actually religious? Like, devoutly religious?

Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?
so we can impress the smart chics with intellectual conversation mix them a couple drinks and bone all night...other than that I cant think of anything

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Then, I asked him "So... do you honestly think Jews are smarter than everybody else?". He didn't give me a straight answer, but he did seem to imply that he considers the fact that we Jews may be smarter than everybody else. Pure bullshit.
Nothing like putting a religionist on the spot. 👆

However, all I'm asking is thus; had the Jews converter into Christianity, or made greater attempts to merge into the mainstream society, would things have been so bad? Yes, it is possible that there would be no country of Israel at the moment. But think about the conflict it would have prevented.

Very difficult question, honestly.

Indeed.

By the way, are you actually religious? Like, devoutly religious?
In the traditional sense: not at all. I very, very rarely go to temple, I identify with the history and traditions (in large part because that's how I was raised), and certainly with the values (especially as Hillel put it, what I see as basic human values). But in terms of any actual spiritual practice, I'm a meditator, the closest style being the Zen Buddhist form called zazen, because it's the least structured and has the least dogma attached to it.

Originally posted by Mindship
Nothing like putting a religionist on the spot. 👆

Yeah. 😄

Originally posted by Mindship
Indeed.

I bet we could spend hours discussing that.

Originally posted by Mindship
In the traditional sense: not at all. I very, very rarely go to temple, I identify with the history and traditions (in large part because that's how I was raised), and certainly with the values (especially as Hillel put it, what I see as basic human values). But in terms of any actual spiritual practice, I'm a meditator, the closest style being the Zen Buddhist form called zazen, because it's the least structured and has the least dogma attached to it.

Ah, I see. Let me put it differently; do you believe in God?

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Ah, I see. Let me put it differently; do you believe in God?
Depends what you mean by "God." As depicted Biblically? I think that's a well-meant but overworked metaphor. As to what the metaphor points to...that's another topic we could likely spend hours discussing.

Yeah, we probably could.

T'was a good debate, mate. (Rhyme intended)

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
Yeah, we probably could.

T'was a good debate, mate. (Rhyme intended)


Aye, lad. Aye that it was.

I don't think I was ever called a lad before.

😕

"Aye, man," didn't sound as cheery.

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
I don't think I was ever called a lad before.

😕


first time for everything have a beer 🍺 drunk goto Queeqs milk bar!

Originally posted by Mindship
"Aye, man," didn't sound as cheery.

It didn't sound as Irish, either. 'Aye, lad' sounds hella scottish/Irish/Norwegian/something.

'Sides, I'm not a lad. I'm a dude.

Originally posted by Jack Daniels
first time for everything have a beer

But.. but... I'm underage...

Oh, **** it. I want A-L-C-H-O-L.

Originally posted by Jack Daniels
goto Queeqs milk bar!

And I suppose you expect me to join Queeq's droogs, right!?

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
It didn't sound as Irish, either. 'Aye, lad' sounds hella scottish/Irish/Norwegian/something.
TV Scottish, actually...

Originally posted by Master Crimzon
It didn't sound as Irish, either. 'Aye, lad' sounds hella scottish/Irish/Norwegian/something.

'Sides, I'm not a lad. I'm a dude.

But.. but... I'm underage...

Oh, **** it. I want A-L-C-H-O-L.

And I suppose you expect me to join Queeq's droogs, right!?


urrr u better have a fake ID dude..lol...theres one old guy at the bar I werk at (in real life) that I know hes way over age but since we have to card everyone and his licence got pulled he went and bought one of those celebrity id's and flashs that to me so I'm seen on camera checking his id...lol...and its not so bad being in Queeqs gang...hes a kewl dude

Originally posted by Mindship
TV Scottish, actually...

Haha! I was right!

[Note; this guy looks like an epic douche. Just sayin', ya know.]

Originally posted by Jack Daniels
urrr u better have a fake ID dude..lol...theres one old guy at the bar I werk at (in real life) that I know hes way over age but since we have to card everyone and his licence got pulled he went and bought one of those celebrity id's and flashs that to me so I'm seen on camera checking his id...lol...and its not so bad being in Queeqs gang...hes a kewl dude

Overage? What the hell is that? I've never heard of that term.

And the problem is, I couldn't get away with saying that I'm 18 (that's the legal age of drinking here). I'm less than that, and I look it. So I have to be content with sneaking some of my dad's booze and drinking it while I skip class.

And I will never join a sociopathic gang like Queeq's evil, vicious droogs.

Shall we return to the topic, gentlemen.

Yessir, yessir.

Originally posted by Jack Daniels
Why do we have an urge to find the meaning of life?
so we can impress the smart chics with intellectual conversation mix them a couple drinks and bone all night...other than that I cant think of anything
You better go and tell wifey that. 😉