Originally posted by Mindship
How did "10%" get picked anyway?
there is probably an interesting story, but afaik, it is out of thin air
the idea comes from the "human potential" movement, which is VERY loosely based on things like the hierarchy of needs. Its very eastern too...
Originally posted by Mindship
If you compare an ordinary person's performance (eg, gymnastics, playing the piano, chess), to that of an expert in the field, the latter demonstrates a higher, more efficient level of that skill (this, of course, includes what the brain is doing). Is the efficiency level now at 80%? 95? I've often wondered. Don't know how you'd quantify that, though.
What you are talking about is, without a doubt, expertise. I've never thought of the 10% myth compared to sports, and it really isn't used that way. It deals more with the "untapped potential" of humans.
Its associated not with being fast and strong, but achieving things outside of everyone elses ability. Its also a very good "god-of-the-gaps" style argument for psychic phenomena and other nonsense.
I don't think percent is even the proper measure, as you imply, 10% of what compared to what? Theoretically, 50% should just be 5 times better than 10%, not the ability to see extradimensional beings or affect reality with your thoughts, as there is none of that in the initial 10%.