__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
If that's the case... High End Mephisto is above High End Odin. On average showings.. Odin would take it.
Also, you guys can quote the no teamwork thing.. but that train of thought makes NO sense. Is the OP claiming he wants them all just to stand there and fire at one another but never the same person more than once and keep alternating your fire. That is retarded and not what he had in mind. If Thanos and Odin are going at it.. what mephisto can't attack anybody because then it's teamwork? Please. It's funny though that you guys tried to correct me. There will always be a team up in a fight like this... unless of course the OP wanted the ridiculous scenerio I laid out...
right but you and I both know that the OP didn't mean for it to be the scenerio I just describe... because that is the only way it would never end up being any team-up
Mephiisto doing better against Galactus than Odin did.. in fact MUCH better... Mephisto enslaving people in Odin's league with ease are just two examples.... Mephisto has lower showings.. which is why I said on average Odin has better showings... Yet their bench mark against Galactus i.e. higher end.. isn't even close.
That's ABC logic and Mephisto also had the benefit of being inside his realm which he doesn't have in this fight. Odin's high end feats have him shaking the fabric of reality and effecting the multiverse and his death causes the Living Tribunal to take notice for a moment.
Using Galactus as the sole benchmark as to why Mephisto > Odin, is incredibly faulty and for obvious reason.
Ummm that isn't close to true... People use the term ABC logic as if it's a bad thing that proves very little. When in fact, it's the EXACT opposite. There is NO better gauge for how someone would do against another when both have faced the same person. If you ask me who has a better chance against Galactus.. Odin for Tyrant... the answer is clear because we have the best available evidence to determine that available... their actually fights with said person and who did better. That isn't abc logic.. that is pretty concrete logical deduction based on actually vs. matches. Taking that further.. if you ask me... who has the better chance against Tyrant.. Odin or Galactus.. one hasn't fought Tyrant and the other has... Yet Odin has fought Galactus and got punked... Tyrant fought Galactus and didn't get punked. Thus, it's easy to deduce that galactus would have a better chance against Tyrant but it's not faulty abc logic.
Galactus is one of the only characters you can't really use as a benchmark since his power is so inconsistent. Galactus might've skipped lunch when he fought Odin.
KMC Community Forums
Jun 13th, 2012 04:15 AM
