quote: (post)

Originally posted by Jam-Jul_Lison
Ushgarak you were the one that made that whole post. Are you now going against what you posted as forum policy?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Ushgarak
I am telling you that if GL says it is so in the films, then it is in the films. That's policy, get used to it.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by =X=


What was that?

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Rampant ox
Surely you can do better!!!

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Rampant ox
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

quote: (post)

Originally posted by =X=
[B]Dooku may have took Anakin's arm but Anakin took both of Dooku's arms and his:

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Rampant ox
Pffffffffft. In a battle that was tipped so far in Anakins favor that if he lost he would have been nothing more than a mere youngling!!!

quote: (post)

Originally posted by =X=
[B]Provide proof. Palpatine wanted the stronger of the two. And Anakin WTFpwned Dooku.[/b[]

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Jam-Jul_Lison
overlord all you do is troll. Not only have i seen it but i have talked to others that say you troll. And yet you never get in trouble. Now here is the real point this post.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f38/t20461.html

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f5/t20463.html

"When it comes to absolute canon, the real story of Star Wars, you must turn to the films themselves - and only the films. Even novelizations are interpretations of the film, and while they are largely true to George Lucas' vision (he works quite closely with the novel authors), the method in which they are written does allow for some minor differences."

it says it right there that movies are the absolute cannon. It does not say Lucas is the absolute cannon. Ushgarak you were the one that made that whole post. Are you now going against what you posted as forum policy? Also restricting Darth Vious was stupid. Yes his Luke and Leia thing was annoying but he kept providing proof for his words and was debating properly. Nothing in the movie proved Anakin was a better swordsman. Yes he won. He won for several reasons. Dooku though if he lost Palpatine would step in to keep him from getting killed. No one fights their hardest when they have a safty net. That is basic psychology. The fight started on 2 on 1. 2 on one is likly to wear someone down but when it is 2 young vs 1 60 year old guy, the 60 year old will wear out faster. Dooku's arrogence throughout the duel. He taunted Anakin making him angry. When angry Anakin become physicly stronger. Anakin grabbed Dooku's arm to restrain his arm from being able to stop Anakin from chopping it off. Restraining a 60 year old man would be easy for just about anyone Anakin's age. Reason there is no proof that Anakin is not a better swordsman. He failed to land a blow on Dooku. He had to resort to grabbing Dooku's arms to win. Here is reasons as why Anakin is not better. First off you can not realy tell this from ROTS. So let's look at Dooku's fight against Yoda in AOTC. Dooku stalemated with Yoda is a contest of sabers.

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Rampant ox
LMAO!!!!

quote: (post)

Originally posted by Jam-Jul_Lison
then maybe you should make some changes to post you made with Cannon Policy. Right now it says Movies are the absolute cannon. As long as it says that then I will hold the Movies higher then Lucas.