They're not facts, don't claim they are. I would never be so blunt as to say to you that God does not exist, so don't be so blunt to me. I believe neither.
__________________
"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield
No, that isn't the what's at stake here. You're claiming that what these people claim to have experienced is true, so what is it that is so special about their case that makes their story more believable than someone who believes they've been abducted and experimented on? These abductees have vivd memories about their abductions, so what makes their story any different from these people who have had experiences with demons?
Nice try with the whole philisophical turnaround there, but I'm not the one who is up for questioning, and the fact that you're immediately resorting to this kind of tactic so early on in this silly thread leads me to think that I'm only going to get nothing but lame excuses and verses as answers.
Edit: Why are you asking people if they can handle the truth? You already have another thread for that topic (which coincidentally should be titled "Can you handle the opinion?")
__________________
You don't need good rear vision because you're always in front!
Gender: Unspecified Location: One for the other hand
Those things are such a joke, so now Mattel games are now in league with the devil?
Eye witness accounts are very unreliable and even in court they barely hold any real weight because they are so subjective. You could have 100 people watch something and you will get 100 different versions of the same event.
I've used one and yes it did do something, I don't know what the explanation for it was. I'm pretty sure it wasn't demons trying to lure me into doin' errands for them though.
__________________
"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield