No. You've got it wrong. You choose to ignore the point to be a**holes. Don't worry, I'm not pissed because I know being an a**hole is fun. God forbid I make a point about being inferior to women.
Sort of...but not really. You and I both know that I knew what your points were. You and I both know that I knew that you guys were choosing to ignore that to instead be internet a**holes because you guys like doing that.
And now, you and I both know you are pulling a typical Bardock by splitting hairs.
You and I both know what you are implying by NOT saying it, but would my point carry as much weight I didn't first indicate that I wasn't just some average joe?
Also, no I don't agree, your point would of held validity without having to tell us how amazingly unique you are. The point is not something that is enforced by experience, you're just telling us for the sake of telling us.
Cheers, so are your thrilling anecdotes.
__________________
"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield
Now this is interesting. How do you prep for a fist fight? (If martial arts, are kicks allowed? Better for the women if they are) I say, just open the floodgates and let 'er rip.
When I think about women getting prep time...then I get scared.
__________________
Shinier than a speeding bullet.
No. I am saying you knew what I meant. If you want to be right, the you are being right for the sake of being right.
"absolutely" would mean there are not conditions that contradict your point.
I disagree, obviously. I was trying to make more of a point about males vs. females that was in line with inimilst's post yet contradictory. The inimilist's example was to show an "average joe" versus world class female athletes. My example was to show a male athlete vs. the best females athletes in the world. It contradicts his post to a certain extent. Duh.
Yes. You didn't get the memo?
Right. I was pointing out how amazingly unique I am by showing my inferiority DESPITE tough training.
Oh really? So how could I have made the point that even a seasoned athlete is inferior to the women? You mean that I would have to use "Joe" from the gym just to avoid appearing narcissistic to a few internet goons?
Comparing yourself to the very best female athletes isn't saying "I'm an inferior person" all around. Not to mention stating how athletic, powerful and "impressive" you are.
"I was a highly trained athlete. I ran track and filed and played football. I put up some very impressive numbers in power lifting competitions. I would be an example, physically, of a superior male." -Dadudemon
You're not exactly belittling yourself there, champ.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
I disagree. And I also like to state, pointing out how inferior I can be, that I can only take Batman 6 our of 10 times. I am ashamed by it, but I had to tell you guys about it.
Yeah, the only trouble is that you now are an average Joe, you work in I.T, we're not going to see you in the Olympics.
Inferior to a woman of world class proportions, that was there simply to make you look good, something you're seemingly addicted to. I have no idea why you raise yourself as a point in every post, presumably a gender debate is about the average of each gender - if you're no average Joe, but in fact an athlete of enormous skill (who does IT work on the side), what do you have to do with this debate?
__________________
"All morons hate it when you call them a moron." - Holden Caulfield
Last edited by chillmeistergen on May 5th, 2008 at 11:07 PM
KMC Community Forums
May 5th, 2008 10:09 PM
