KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Consensus on being born gay?

Consensus on being born gay?
Started by: Col. Novine

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (23): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by focus4chumps
why do you need to reply to my "trolling"?


Reported for derailing a thread with more trolling.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:50 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
tsilamini
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
Here is how I define that:

A genetic predisposition is an inherited risk of developing a disease or condition.



Let me know if I got that wrong, Professor inimalist.


genetic predisposition means that a certain trait or quality is predisposed by a person's genetics.

so, humans are predisposed to learn language, especially between a critical period that seems to end at some point around 10 years of age.

a child that never is exposed to language will never develop language, but the predisposition was still there. A child with a predisposition to ODD may never develop it, it does not mean the predisposition was never there.

not always a risk, not necessarily inherited, not only relevant for diseases or conditions.


__________________
yes, a million times yes

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:51 PM
tsilamini is currently offline Click here to Send tsilamini a Private Message Find more posts by tsilamini Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
No, they are not "pure homo" as some would claim. Just the same as some claiming "pure straight".

No, that would be accurate, not faulty. And, yes, it would be a person to person basis. We are the sum of our sexual experiences/thoughts. Our sexuality cannot be clearly defined by a singular instant.


There are likely very few homosexuals on the planet then, using your logic. Just bisexuals who at some point are with only the same sex. I disagree.

But you're saying a singular instance can define someone as bisexual. A man who has only ever been with women except for one homosexual instance would be "bisexual" according to you. The same for a man who's only ever been with men with the exception of one heterosexual instant. I disagree.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:52 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
focus4chumps
Restricted

Gender: Male
Location:

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
Reported for derailing a thread with more trolling.


pretty hypocritical considering i was parodying your whole routine word for word. but thats ok if you need to tattle to feel better.

also i think one report is enough.


__________________
"Your Lord knows very well what is in your heart. Your soul suffices this day as a reckoner against you. I need no witnesses. You do not listen to your soul, but listen instead to your anger and your rage."

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=denton+van+zan+vs

Last edited by focus4chumps on Jun 14th, 2012 at 09:58 PM

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:54 PM
focus4chumps is currently offline Click here to Send focus4chumps a Private Message Find more posts by focus4chumps Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
genetic predisposition means that a certain trait or quality is predisposed by a person's genetics.


I think it means a genetic probability of inheriting certain traits.

I also think predisposition is not the same thing as genetic predisposition. (go back through our conversation and you should see that...I think)

quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
not always a risk, not necessarily inherited, not only relevant for diseases or conditions.


This is pretty much my point.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:54 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
There are likely very few homosexuals on the planet then, using your logic.


Not my "logic": Kinsey Institute's research of which you were already aware.


quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Just bisexuals who at some point are with only the same sex. I disagree.


Almost every last human is bisexual with very few exceptions.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
But you're saying a singular instance can define someone as bisexual.


Yup. Thoughts count, too. Pretend 7 is pure straight and 1 is pure gay. Very few people would fall on 7 or 1. Does that scale look familiar? smile

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
A man who has only ever been with women except for one homosexual instance would be "bisexual" according to you.


Yes, that's what I am getting at. Sure, they may be much more straight than gay.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
The same for a man who's only ever been with men with the exception of one heterosexual instant. I disagree.


You can disagree, but sexuality is not as polar as you would like it to be. It is definitely not this "0 or 1" idea that you have.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 09:57 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
Not my "logic": Kinsey Institute's research of which you were already aware.




Almost every last human is bisexual with very few exceptions.



Yup. Thoughts count, too. Pretend 7 is pure straight and 1 is pure gay. Very few people would fall on 7 or 1. Does that scale look familiar? smile


Yes, that's what I am getting at. Sure, they may be much more straight than gay.


You can disagree, but sexuality is not as polar as you would like it to be. It is definitely not this "0 or 1" idea that you have.


So you're using the Kinsey "everyone's bisexual since there's really no 7's or 1's" mindset. Cool.

But a 6 or 2 would be considered straight or homosexual for practical purposes, if we're not being retards. I don't have a "1 or 0" idea.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Last edited by Robtard on Jun 14th, 2012 at 10:03 PM

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:00 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
So you're using the Kinsey "everyone's bisexual since there's really no 7's or 1's" mindset. Cool.


I take it a step further, though, and don't just stick to two poles on sexuality. I include other "dimensions" because some types of sexuality are not defined as "Finding the set of genetically prime women attractive" or "find the set of genetically prime men attractive". Sexuality is more than just those two definitions: even when injecting a sliding scale between the two poles.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:02 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
tsilamini
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I think it means a genetic probability of inheriting certain traits.


in theory, it has nothing to do with inheritance

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I also think predisposition is not the same thing as genetic predisposition. (go back through our conversation and you should see that...I think)


quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
Dictionary.com:

predisposition -

1. the fact or condition of being predisposed: a predisposition to think optimistically.

2. Medicine/Medical . tendency to a condition or quality, usually based on the combined effects of genetic and environmental factors.

predispose

1. to give an inclination or tendency to beforehand; make susceptible: Genetic factors may predispose human beings to certain metabolic diseases.

2. to render subject, susceptible, or liable: The evidence predisposes him to public censure.

3. to dispose beforehand.

4. Archaic . to dispose of beforehand, as in a will, legacy, or the like.


quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
This is pretty much my point.


except that you said:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
A genetic predisposition is an inherited risk of developing a disease or condition.


in which 3-4 points within your definition are wrong, and what you quoted was me pointing that out to you

smile


__________________
yes, a million times yes

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:05 PM
tsilamini is currently offline Click here to Send tsilamini a Private Message Find more posts by tsilamini Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I take it a step further, though, and don't just stick to two poles on sexuality. I include other "dimensions" because some types of sexuality are not defined as "Finding the set of genetically prime women attractive" or "find the set of genetically prime men attractive". Sexuality is more than just those two definitions: even when injecting a sliding scale between the two poles.


Where are you on the Kinsey scale?


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:05 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Shakyamunison
Nam Myoho Renge Kyo

Gender: Male
Location: Southern Oregon, Looking at you.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Where are you on the Kinsey scale?


laughing out loud You are evil. Fortunately, I don't have sex, I'm married. stick out tongue


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:07 PM
Shakyamunison is currently offline Click here to Send Shakyamunison a Private Message Find more posts by Shakyamunison Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
in theory, it has nothing to do with inheritance


Wah?

Please tell me you're joking. It has everything to do with inheritance. There are things called genotypes and phenotypes. I think you are aware of this.




To your requote of the same thing you already posted:

"I like that 'combination of genetic and environmental factors' definition, the most."


I would never define, with just "predisposition" something that was actually a "genetic predisposition". Maybe I would if I had first defined "genetic predisposition" in the writing. But just calling it a "predisposition" is not accurate.



quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
except that you said:



in which 3-4 points within your definition are wrong, and what you quoted was me pointing that out to you

smile


Errm.

No?

Nothing you said is following, logically.


This:

"A genetic predisposition is an inherited risk of developing a disease or condition."

Is in no way contradictory to this (a modified version of what you stated):


"Genes are not always a risk, not necessarily inherited, and not the only relevant element that determines diseases or conditions."


Please rephrase your point but actually make your point.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:12 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Where are you on the Kinsey scale?


If 7 is perfect "straight", I would probably be a 6.9.

I can't say that I am perfectly straight because I cannot claim to know all facets of my sexuality: I have not experienced every circumstance possible to properly determine a perfect 7.


However...I'm pretty dang straight.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:15 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
tsilamini
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

inheritance is a common mechanism of genetic predisposition, but is not necessary

otherwise, that seems like, at best, semantic gibberish that I have no desire to argue with you about for pages


__________________
yes, a million times yes

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:16 PM
tsilamini is currently offline Click here to Send tsilamini a Private Message Find more posts by tsilamini Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
If 7 is perfect "straight", I would probably be a 6.9.

I can't say that I am perfectly straight because I cannot claim to know all facets of my sexuality: I have not experienced every circumstance possible to properly determine a perfect 7.


However...I'm pretty dang straight.


"Almost every last human is bisexual with very few exceptions."

0.1, lol, dude.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:16 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
"Almost every last human is bisexual with very few exceptions."

0.1, lol, dude.



I very well could be bisexual. smile


But I think I'm pretty straight.


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:18 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by inimalist
inheritance is a common mechanism of genetic predisposition, but is not necessary

otherwise, that seems like, at best, semantic gibberish that I have no desire to argue with you about for pages


I am reading your point as "you cannot genetically inherit a genetic predisposition in some instances." That..........may be true of some known mutational problems? There's so much stuff involved with making absolute statements and I wish to avoid them.


But what about all that other stuff?


__________________

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 10:20 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
tsilamini
Junior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I am reading your point as "you cannot genetically inherit a genetic predisposition in some instances."


allow me to clarify then:

Inheritance, as in, the genes you get from your father's sperm and mother's egg, is a common way that genetic predisposition occurs. Probably the most common. Therefore it is a mechanism of the phenomenon.

However, they are not the same thing. In theory [edit] inheritance is not really related to genetic predisposition, aside from the fact that it is a common mechanism that produces it. Sure, appealing to inheritance probably explains many of the predispositions we see, but that isn't the same as inheritance being a definitional quality of genetic predisposition.

Think of it like evolution. Genetics provide the mechanism for it, but they aren't really related in theory [edit]. The relation is one we ascribe because of the explanatory power, however, in theory, there is nothing that necessitates the two concepts being related to one another.


__________________
yes, a million times yes

Last edited by tsilamini on Jun 14th, 2012 at 11:15 PM

Old Post Jun 14th, 2012 11:05 PM
tsilamini is currently offline Click here to Send tsilamini a Private Message Find more posts by tsilamini Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Digi
Forum Leader

Gender: Unspecified
Location:

Thanks for the reports. I issued a warning. Let me know if it continues.


__________________

Old Post Jun 15th, 2012 12:32 AM
Digi is currently offline Click here to Send Digi a Private Message Find more posts by Digi Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
NemeBro
Senior Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Saving KMC

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon
I very well could be bisexual. smile


But I think I'm pretty straight.
You've sent me pictures of yourself shirtless via PM, flexing your chest and abs.

Yeah man. Super straight.


__________________
Thanks Scythe!

Old Post Jun 15th, 2012 12:43 AM
NemeBro is currently offline Click here to Send NemeBro a Private Message Find more posts by NemeBro Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 04:14 PM.
Pages (23): « 1 2 [3] 4 5 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Consensus on being born gay?

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.