Originally posted by NuclearWinter
However, just so you know, when I click on the link that J-Beo provided it still tells me that I get 0 results for your opinion.
here is the link that J-Beo provided:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Kharmadog%27s+opinion&btnG=Google+Search
And when you click that link you get this.
http://www.boardtracker.com/cgi-bin/display_member.pl?board=318&member=22894
Not that it's important, it just shows tht you're wrong.
Originally posted by KharmaDog
here is the link that J-Beo provided:http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Kharmadog%27s+opinion&btnG=Google+Search
And when you click that link you get this.
http://www.boardtracker.com/cgi-bin/display_member.pl?board=318&member=22894
Not that it's important, it just shows tht you're wrong.
No actually that's not what I get. This is what I get:
Your search - Kharmadog's opinion - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
Try different keywords.
Try more general keywords.
Try fewer keywords.
Originally posted by NuclearWinter
No actually that's not what I get. This is what I get:Your search - Kharmadog's opinion - did not match any documents.
Suggestions:
Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
Try different keywords.
Try more general keywords.
Try fewer keywords.
I don't know what to tell you? There is clearly one result on Google search which then leads into 25 results.
So, you're basically wrong.
Originally posted by KharmaDogGoogle Whack! 😱
First, you are equating the validitidy of your belief system against the frequecy of home many search results "Kharmadog's opinion" results in?That says it all right there folks.
Secondly, if you type [b]Kharmadog's opinion
on google you get at least one result. [/B]
Originally posted by Deano
why is this being argued? idiots
Once again, you show that unless someone puts forth a thought for you to copy and paste, you have a limited ability to think on your own.
What is being discussed is Nuclear's resources and now his apparent inability to accept truth.
He made a claim and stated that it was a well known fact. I put forth evidence that it was not well known at all. Then he decided to try and insult his way out of looking foolish and ended up digging a deeper hole. Much like you do.
Originally posted by KharmaDogI enjoy you humiliating Deano and co. so very much. 😂
Once again, you show that unless someone puts forth a thought for you to copy and paste, you have a limited ability to think on your own.What is being discussed is Nuclear's resources and now his apparent inability to accept truth.
He made a claim and stated that it was a well known fact. I put forth evidence that it was not well known at all. Then he decided to try and insult his way out of looking foolish and ended up digging a deeper hole. Much like you do.
I was once in a very very very heated argument about how St. Paul was able to fund his trips across the east spreading the "good news" as the apostles put it.
The man I was debating with was very strongly behind the idea that Paul funded his own journeys by working as a carpenter, I was telling him that the evidence was clear that all the apostles were backed up by rich women. (this is pre-da vinci code) He refused to accept this, he had no evidence to support the idea that Paul was self-funded and when I asked him his backing he stated:
It is just good common sense
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav😂 We should revive the idiotic debating tactics thread and add "Using "common sense" to strengthen your ridiculous claim."
I was once in a very very very heated argument about how St. Paul was able to fund his trips across the east spreading the "good news" as the apostles put it.The man I was debating with was very strongly behind the idea that Paul funded his own journeys by working as a carpenter, I was telling him that the evidence was clear that all the apostles were backed up by rich women. (this is pre-da vinci code) He refused to accept this, he had no evidence to support the idea that Paul was self-funded and when I asked him his backing he stated:
this thread was a good read.........
here's what I got out of it....
- Kharmadog suggested that before anybody believe anything they read on a website or any sort of biased medium, they themselves should check the credentials of those individuals making claims. He was then met with "well check out what this guys says, he's a scientist in math". Hmmm....#1....mathamatics is not a field of science, therefore, the entire claim of this man's credentials is absolute nonsense as the field of science he is supposed to be accredited in does not exist. #2......NuclearWinter, who posted this, never researched the false credentials given...the very topic this thread is about. He read something on someone's website that said he was accredited, never once finding a copy of this man's diploma or doctorite or affirming this accreditation through public records. Basicly, this guy's an expert.....see it says on his own page that he's an expert........now listen to what he says about the aliens who lived on atlantis who transversed the globe on unicorns.
- NuclearWinter also gives Plato as one of his sources. A person that in his own story says this story took place more than 9,000 years before he was even born, negating any first hand knowledge or research on the subject. Basicly, a report as reputable as any story I can make up about events happening in 7,000 B.C. Actually less reputable as Plato was never accreditted in anything......he never even attended a government acreddited university, making it impossible for him to have graduated with an accreditted degree or doctorite in any field, which I have done.
- a term was brought up by NuclearWinter that Kharmadog was not farmiliar with "Aha-Men-Ptah". In the interest of knowledge, Kharmadog then went about a search for this term via Google to find out about it. The only references returned were in other languages or on 4 English pages devoted to conspiracy, pole shift, alien anal probe type websites. When Kharmadog mentioned this, NuclearWinter responded that was not true.....then went on to give links to one of the non-English speaking websites and two of the conspiracy, pole shift, alien anal probe websites previously mentioned by Kharmadog. Never once giving a link to a reputable scientific agency or accreditted expert's research published in a reputable scientific medium.
that in mind, I have 2 questions for NuclearWinter.
1. You have apparently arrived at the conclusion that there is going to be a pole shift in the year 2012. Please give me the names of the reputable scientifc papers published in reputable scientific journals or links to the equivelants appearing in other accreditted scientific mediums. Can you please do this for me? Keep in mind....only accreditted scientific mediums, nothing that deals with conspiracy, paranormal, aliens or strictly pole shift. Surely something this huge would have atleast one or two papers published by Geological Society of America, Journal of Metamorphic Geology, etc. Hell....I'd even take something published by National Geographic magazine.
2. What are you going to do 5 years from now when nothing happens? you are a new poster here, how long do you plan on sticking around? I've been here over four years so any event I predicted (when I first began posting here) to occur in 5 years would be near fruition. I'll still be here in a year so people could laugh at me and eat a big plate of crow. Will you still be posting here in 2012 when nothing happens and you have to admit that all of the psychics and interdimensional mediums (I think that's what the chick on zetatalk.com said she is) were all bat-shit crazy attention seeking whores? Are you going to come into this forum and post, "okay guys.....you were right. There never was anything to it, I got caught up in believing internet conspiracy sites when I should have been reading accreditted scientific journals to get my scientific information."?