Originally posted by chithappens
Of course you are right.I only meant to use it as a way to give a quick synopsis. To have a proper discussion using general labels would be arbitrary.
Then that's fine. QM takes an entirely different approach, blandly grouping together numerous belief systems together simply because he doesn't consider them to be legitimate....not just for synopses but for anything. I'd be interested to see how thoroughly he breaks down various Christian sects, if only to see how far the double standard in his mind reaches. My issue is primarily with him, not with your (generally) usable and logical distinctions earlier.
Originally posted by DigiMark007
I'd be interested to see how thoroughly he breaks down various Christian sects, if only to see how far the double standard in his mind reaches. My issue is primarily with him, not with your (generally) usable and logical distinctions earlier.
I generally don't try to to segregate the Christian denominations. So I try to avoid using terms like Catholic, Presbyterian, Episcopalian, United Methodist, Southern Baptist and so on. To me, the world's two billion Christians are Christians as far as I'm concerned.