Aren't they the same though? Sure IW Ironman did good against Thanos but that was a Thanos that wasn't relying on his Strength, Skillsand Blade.
If IW Ironman fought Endgame Thanos it would be pretty much the same imo. What do you think?
Separate him from a weapon he can mentally summon? sounds like someone hasn't watched the movies.
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Ragnarok Thor was getting the better of Hulk before he had full control of his lightning powers, so even if they could separate him from the axe it wouldn't be a clear cut victory for the team. That's all a moot point since Thor can summon Stormbreaker.
IW IM fought a Thanos with 4 Infinity stones and fight him solo at times. That's way more impressive than anything Endgame IM did. You have to remember that Stark probably hasn't fought for 5 years at that point.
Good point.
Though you have to consider that Thanos wasn't seriously fighting or meant to kill any of them in Infinity War maybe right until Tony drew blood. And also EndgameThanos used the blade to deflect all their attacks including Energy attacks.
Well, he had just watched himself complete his quest just to get his head chopped off. I imagine he decided against learning the stones power at the same time he fought them. Wanted to make sure he won the fight this time and that would require him using what he is most formidable, comfortable and efficient with..
Stormbreaker doesn't have worthy enchantment. It can be held against Thor's will if he throws it. Iron will be amped with lightning. IM has Shields and can create cutting weapons. He can also dodge hammer throws or possibly catch it. Thor has a harder time with I'M than Hulk.
Endgame Iron Man's shields changed from nanite to energy, but they weren't used in actual combat so it's unclear how strong they actually are. He only used it during the Hulk snap to protect him and Hawkeye from being near it.
(please log in to view the image)
Oh, and Thor wins.
__________________ Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Why would you not think Thanos wasn't seriously fighting? Sure he wasn't quite as bloodthirsty as he was in Endgame but her certainly was willing to kill Infinity War. Heck, he killed a whole bunch of Asgardians in the first few minutes of the movie.
As for using his blade to deflect attacks, that's because IM and Thor fought stupidly in Endgame. Had they simply stayed at range and bombarded him with ranged attacks then Thanos would not have been able to block all of them.
I see that h1 still doesn't know that Thor can summon Stormbreaker
__________________ posted by Badabing
I don't know why some of you are going on about being right and winning. Rob and Impediment were in on this gag because I PMed them. Silent and Rao PMed me and figured I changed the post. I highly doubt anybody thought Quan made the post, but simply played along just for the lulz.
Its actually not even confirmed that he can deflect Thors lightning. Only IMs repulsors. I know Thor amped IM, but it was still repulsors shots being fired at Thanos, not lightning.
They really needed a scene to justify them fighting up close though against a guy stronger than Hulk, a better warrior than Thor, with a sword as strong as Mjolnir or Stormbreaker.
Sep 3rd, 2021 01:31 AM
Thor is beastly.
