cuz it was more american. and halled wasent a good choice and the scene where he is getting chased by that light beam what ever it was. COMMON that is such an american film. it only got the most money cuz it was more action and less story plot.
1. yeah, that bothered me too, I don't think she's that pretty and when it comes to playing a secret agents, she sucks beasants
2. Best? I dunno, but it was darn good
3. not by a long shot, the vanish bothered the hell out of me, gimme the Z3
4. That's your pov, I would say that he had his moments in it, but not that stunning
5. have you considered the power of the currency? I mean, the oldies made a few (50?) million dollars, in those days that was a lot, now you can't even shoot a movie with taht amount!
but to say mine... OHMSS... lousy bond, stupid blofeld can't recognise bond when he's in front of him, stupid FX, annoying catching of blofeld, marriage where there shouldn't be any (or at least longer), ...
Erm, yerss - WHEN did they catch Blofeld in OHMSS? And the FX are pretty awful in some of the other Bond films too. I mean, even in DAD - that parasailing bit {which was done with CGI} was terrible!
Having said that, I also think that OHMSS is one of the weaker entries in the series. But then again, I can see what they were trying to do...
I think my vote would be for Dr. No. It just doesn't have the entertainment values that the other Bond films have.
__________________
Ahnold Sez: (From "The Expendables 2"): "My *shoe* is bigger than this cahr!"
KMC Community Forums
Aug 13th, 2004 02:41 AM
