actually the spiderman movies so far are crap.We only have seen the character of man-spider on the screen so far.The only way to improve on them is instead of trying to make sequels is restart the franchise all over again like they did with batman with batman begins and do the same thing batman which was they got a batman director who for once knew what he was doing and was a fans director.Spider-man needs to do the same thing,stop making sequels and restart it all over again by getting a director who cares about the fans and doing the character of spiderman justice.Giving him his mechs and redoing the villains.Thats the ONLY way to improve the spider-man movies.Also get a competent screenwriter.David Koepp was a HUGE mistake for the first film and just set the tone for more crappy movies in the future.the screenwriters thay had for the second film were much more competent than Koepp was but it was too late.Koepp already had caused too much damage with the first horrible film making the sequels beyond repair to be fixed for the future.
MY TAKE: i somewhat agree with you, they did change a perfectly good character. But the majority of people have adapted to this new spiderman and have learned to love the movies. Everyone CAN expect future spiderman remakes, and the spiderman 1 movie will be looked upon the same way as Batman(with keaton/nicholson) /batman &robin
Dont want to sound rude or anything since unlike most people,you can discuss this in a rational and cilvilized way but where do you get this wild theory that the majority have adapted to the movie and have accepted the changes,there is no evidence to that whatsoever?
come on please,dont give me that old,tiresome and laughable logic that most people have adapted to it and loved the movie because it made so much money at the box office.you just proved my point why it made so much money with the huge spike in sales at the box office for childrens books.millions of familys across the nation took their kids back to the theaters to see it again and again because their kids wanted them to see it and begged them to.Kids get thrilled about seeing spidey on the big screen so they are going to beg their parents to take them to see it and parents being parents,they went back again and again for the kids wishes so their kids could see it again and again.
agree with fate, im tired of puny parker.....he must be mr parker now. in comcis after he got ahold of his powere he became more manly,more outgoing, in the movie he is still a geek jeck....
and mr parker get over it. people have adapted YES, they did, and not for sales, becouse they DID, example i have a lot of friends who made fun of me being spider fan becouse for them spider was gay like, too femalis-ish in his acrobatic stuff, and they though spider sense was the lamest thing ever, they saw spiderman movie, that is like, lets say has 65% of the character of spiderman and they all freaked out , turning into spider fans, some even star buying old spider comics.
the movie was teenager directed, and it hit the targer very well, althogu cool, was a ok movie.
back to thread. kill mj off, bring gwen and have the happy marry ending we all fans wanted.
Last edited by Spiderman_RJ on Oct 14th, 2005 at 12:51 AM
myself being a teenager, did not feel it was targetted at my crowd specifically, maybe a general family audience. Tobey also did not convince me he was A teen. he looked 20 at the very least(to be picky: no teen has a comb over and has a clean room)
Acually your wrong, and I can talk about this in a civilized mannor, only if you dont freak out after what I say.
Im in my twenties, I loved the movie, almost everyone I've asked my age has loved it, the kids the adults. When i saw it in theatres, even my 3rd time going to see it, there were more adults than kids, WAY more. And yes they were childless.
I have seen it first hand.
And why do you think the SM2 trailer was one of the most highly anticipated trailers in movie history. Children arnt professional critics, adults are. And alot of people (like myself) was blown away by the movie.
Sure there was alittle to much romance, but its HOLLYWOOD, what do you expect. I cant think of 1 movie where there isnt that. Kids or Adults.
So please if your against Spiderman SOOO much than why do you post here?
--Either you like it, or you hate that people do love it soo much --enough said--
__________________
I am the evil Seed...The seed that went Wrong... The seed that spread horror...The seed that was Never meant to be......
silversteiin, like the other friend up there im now 20, but when spidey came out i was like 15 or 16,and even with that age i though it was target to teenager,u called it familly movie,ok, becouse there were too many elements of stupid movies for teenagers, like the fight,figth scene, the lunchroom, joke, the fisting web joke, at least thats what i think as teenagers, cos for me there were not much reason for those jokes they only made the movies more child like, again u call family.
i hope any teenager dont get offended, but i generaly refer as teen movie, to those stupid jokes and gags, that are target for teenagers.
err no Im not wrong.just because almost everyone you asked loved it doesnt mean anything.Just about everybody I ask doesnt except for kids of course.Not saying that means anything,just throwing that out there as an example that that means nothing. one time in theaters with childless people dooesnt mean that most people that went back time and time again were all adults everytime.
it was anticipated because of how he he is such an extremely popular character.star wars return of the sith was highly anticipated this past summer despite the fact that the prequels were horrible movies and not at all great and awesome like the original trilogy was.It was a huge money maker at the box office but it is hardly a great film like the first two star wars original films A New Hope and Empire strikes Back are.
Yes you are so right,thats one of many reasons why the movies are no good because there is far way too much romance in it.Spider-man was never about one girl and never should be,neither should the movies.I dont post here anywhere near as much as I used to.matter of fact,look at that one thread made by spideys sister,asking what happened to the long time posters who used to come here all the time,you will see where she mentioned my name and asked why I dont post here anymore. I seldom post here as much as I used to because of the same old tiresome points that are brought up that are untrue like that one.Its hard not to come here when the name SPIDER-MAN is lit up in huge big letters and has a section all for itself. and if everytime someone posted,a particular thread wasnt lit up so that everyone can see it,I probably wouldnt come here that often,but when I see a thread i find interesting that you cant help but see here because its always posted for everyone to see,then I cant fight the urge to not come here and post. this was a thread that caught my eye,so I posted on it,simple as that.
I don't know why so many people are pissed about the organic webbing. Does it make any sense that he can have all those spider abilities and NOT the web? I always thought that was stupid so I'm really glad they just made it organic in this.
thats really sad that you dont care about them raping to death his character like they did.all the organic webbing does is dumb down his character and take away his creativity.before with the mechs,it showed that peter and peter alone was destined to become spiderman,not just anybody could have used their creative genius to create the fluid like he did,now any idiot like flash thompson can become spiderman and he is not an impressive character anymore.plus the organics are stupid because it makes no sense for the webbing to shoot out of his wrists,when logically it would shoot out of his butt.