KillerMovies - Movies That Matter!

REGISTER HERE TO JOIN IN! - It's easy and it's free!
Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Modern day USA vs the entire world during WW2

Modern day USA vs the entire world during WW2
Started by: Hewhoknowsall

Forum Jump:
Post New Thread    Post A Reply
Pages (6): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread
Author
Thread
Hewhoknowsall
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Account Restricted

Modern day USA vs the entire world during WW2

Rules:

NO Nukes

Modern America replaces WW2 America geographically

Another country with the same capabilities as WW2 America appears in Africa on the side of the WW2 dudes

The WW2 dudes have all of their damages and stuff repaired, and Hitler is still around leading Nazi Germany


__________________
Introduce a little government. Upset the established gangs, and everything becomes order...
Democracy is the very definition of awesome.

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 08:52 PM
Hewhoknowsall is currently offline Click here to Send Hewhoknowsall a Private Message Find more posts by Hewhoknowsall Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
lil bitchiness
-

Gender: Female
Location: Limassol, Cyprus

Moderator

But ''we'' the rest of the world, have on disposal Islamic fundamentalists?

And the Chinese and Indians?

''We'' the rest of the world, win.


__________________

في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 08:53 PM
lil bitchiness is currently offline Click here to Send lil bitchiness a Private Message Find more posts by lil bitchiness Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Hewhoknowsall
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
But ''we'' the rest of the world, have on disposal Islamic fundamentalists?

And the Chinese and Indians?

''We'' the rest of the world, win.


This is the rest of the world AS OF WW2 vs MODERN America


__________________
Introduce a little government. Upset the established gangs, and everything becomes order...
Democracy is the very definition of awesome.

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 08:56 PM
Hewhoknowsall is currently offline Click here to Send Hewhoknowsall a Private Message Find more posts by Hewhoknowsall Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
But ''we'' the rest of the world, have on disposal Islamic fundamentalists?

And the Chinese and Indians?

''We'' the rest of the world, win.


Islamo-fundies didn't have the tech then that they do now.

The Billions of WW2 era Chinese couldn't repel the Japanese then.

Indians on elephants loose to tanks, jets and machine-guns.

Modern aircraft carriers FTW here, easy too.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 09:01 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
lil bitchiness
-

Gender: Female
Location: Limassol, Cyprus

Moderator

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
This is the rest of the world AS OF WW2 vs MODERN America


How do you mean?

China has been there all along intact, and so was India, plus we'd have Pakistan and Bangladesh still part of India.
And Islamic fundamentalists didn't appear on Sept 11th. They existed long ago, and as we know certain republics in the middle east were allied or sympathetic to Hitler.

We would also have Korea as one country too, Russia would be some weird psycho dictatorship.


Again, rest of the world, wins.


__________________

في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 09:01 PM
lil bitchiness is currently offline Click here to Send lil bitchiness a Private Message Find more posts by lil bitchiness Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
lil bitchiness
-

Gender: Female
Location: Limassol, Cyprus

Moderator

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Robtard
Islamo-fundies didn't have the tech then that they do now.

The Billions of WW2 era Chinese couldn't repel the Japanese then.

Indians on elephants loose to tanks, jets and machine-guns.

Modern aircraft carriers FTW here, easy too.


What tech is that? A bomb?
What does Manchuran invasion prove? you're talking about America vs the rest of the world - then such has nothing to do with anything.

Chinese, Japanese (just because of Manchuria), Indian, German and Russian armies would be enough to squash America.
Chinese have people to waste. So do Indians.

(no offence to Chinese, I love you guys!)


__________________

في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 09:06 PM
lil bitchiness is currently offline Click here to Send lil bitchiness a Private Message Find more posts by lil bitchiness Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

I'd say that if we can't use nukes and that was agreed on, we'd go ape shit with vacuum bombs and design a new one to be ICBM capable. We'd build bigger vacuum bombs, as well.

The tech on subs has improved so much that no sub would make it within 200 miles of US soil. Aircraft would be taken out with the literally automatic missles. They even have missiles that can take out other missiles...but that won't even be a factor.

Against an F-22, even modern aircraft don't stand a chance. The missile systems in even antiquated fighter jets who lay waste to all other aircraft.

Quite literally, all opposing aircraft would be taken out long before there was any visual. It would seem almost like magic and they would accuse the US of having phantoms.

And, through diplomacy, we could convince many of the nations to quickly surrender. It would quickly turn into a war against very few nations, especially after the first day or two of fighting.





I'd say the same about Modern Russia versus the rest of 1940 world, too. However, I wouldn't be surprised if they used Nukes.


__________________

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 09:10 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Robtard
Senor Member

Gender: Unspecified
Location: Captain's Chair, CA

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
What tech is that? A bomb?
What does Manchuran invasion prove? you're talking about America vs the rest of the world - then such has nothing to do with anything.

Chinese, Japanese (just because of Manchuria), Indian, German and Russian armies would be enough to squash America.
Chinese have people to waste. So do Indians.

(no offence to Chinese, I love you guys!)


Cell phones, plane tickets, the internet etc.

The Chinese despite their billions couldn't stave off the 1940's Japanese army, yet you think they're going to hold against America with 21st century technology?

These countries probably couldn't squash America in the 40's. They're not doing it now when America has 70 years of a technological edge in this scenario.


__________________


You've Just Been Kirked To The Curb

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 09:17 PM
Robtard is currently offline Click here to Send Robtard a Private Message Find more posts by Robtard Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Hewhoknowsall
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
How do you mean?

China has been there all along intact, and so was India, plus we'd have Pakistan and Bangladesh still part of India.
And Islamic fundamentalists didn't appear on Sept 11th. They existed long ago, and as we know certain republics in the middle east were allied or sympathetic to Hitler.

We would also have Korea as one country too, Russia would be some weird psycho dictatorship.


Again, rest of the world, wins.


I mean that in this scenario America gets modern technology while the world's stuck with WW2 tech.

Oh, and I really don't have any idea why some fundamentalists would make a win for the world. Korea would fail, and Russia wouldn't be able to get within a few hundred miles of US territory.

In this case it's quality vs quantity.


__________________
Introduce a little government. Upset the established gangs, and everything becomes order...
Democracy is the very definition of awesome.

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:05 PM
Hewhoknowsall is currently offline Click here to Send Hewhoknowsall a Private Message Find more posts by Hewhoknowsall Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AngryManatee
Sexy Ham Manwich

Gender: Male
Location: Austin, TX

This would be a curbstomp, based on a comparison of tech. Even with the Navy's penis reduction (F-14 Tomcat being replaced by the F-18E Super Hornet), it would dominate the Pacific theater.


__________________


You don't need good rear vision because you're always in front!

Last edited by AngryManatee on Sep 21st, 2009 at 10:15 PM

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:09 PM
AngryManatee is currently offline Click here to Send AngryManatee a Private Message Find more posts by AngryManatee Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AthenasTrgrFngr
Don't wanna die...

Gender: Female
Location: No Russian

what is the usa's military goal here? is to occupy the other countries... or just kill the shit out of them?


if our goal is to just kill everything and cripple the countries then we can win very easily with almost no losses. if our goal is to occupy the countries... then we're in trouble.


__________________

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:13 PM
AthenasTrgrFngr is currently offline Click here to Send AthenasTrgrFngr a Private Message Find more posts by AthenasTrgrFngr Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Hewhoknowsall
Restricted

Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States

Account Restricted

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
what is the usa's military goal here? is to occupy the other countries... or just kill the shit out of them?


if our goal is to just kill everything and cripple the countries then we can win very easily with almost no losses. if our goal is to occupy the countries... then we're in trouble.


Hmm...sorry, I forgot to think of that.

Let's just say that their objective is to not destroy them completely nor occupy their land, but defeat their armies while causing as little unnecessary civilian deaths or collateral damage as possible.


__________________
Introduce a little government. Upset the established gangs, and everything becomes order...
Democracy is the very definition of awesome.

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:18 PM
Hewhoknowsall is currently offline Click here to Send Hewhoknowsall a Private Message Find more posts by Hewhoknowsall Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
KidRock
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location:

I would say USA, pretty easily. The capabilities of the airforce and navy today are so much better then those of WWII it wouldn't even be close.


__________________

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:27 PM
KidRock is currently offline Click here to Send KidRock a Private Message Find more posts by KidRock Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AthenasTrgrFngr
Don't wanna die...

Gender: Female
Location: No Russian

quote: (post)
Originally posted by Hewhoknowsall
Hmm...sorry, I forgot to think of that.

Let's just say that their objective is to not destroy them completely nor occupy their land, but defeat their armies while causing as little unnecessary civilian deaths or collateral damage as possible.


if thats the case then we could be in trouble. it wouldnt be out of the question for the armies of many of the other countries to "dissolve" and become part of the civilian by day and result to guerrilla warfare by night similar to whats going on with the taliban now. all of our technology wont matter, then.


__________________

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:30 PM
AthenasTrgrFngr is currently offline Click here to Send AthenasTrgrFngr a Private Message Find more posts by AthenasTrgrFngr Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
lil bitchiness
-

Gender: Female
Location: Limassol, Cyprus

Moderator

Of course there would be a guerilla warfare. And not only that, there would be a whole lot of sabotage, suicide bombings and missions.

Not to mention that anyone American or found to be American in any country outside USA would be immediately put to death.

It would not work. Never. You're talking about 2 billion people against however many people were in USA in 1930s/1940s.

And also the irony of a great deal of technology which developed after war was contributed by Nazis and Hitler's projects and such.


__________________

في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:57 PM
lil bitchiness is currently offline Click here to Send lil bitchiness a Private Message Find more posts by lil bitchiness Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
AthenasTrgrFngr
Don't wanna die...

Gender: Female
Location: No Russian

this is all only true if the americans arent allowed to harm civilians.

if we were, then we would kill every single man woman and child in the other countries and no one would be able to stop us. but the same is not true if the other countries tried to invade us.


__________________

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 10:59 PM
AthenasTrgrFngr is currently offline Click here to Send AthenasTrgrFngr a Private Message Find more posts by AthenasTrgrFngr Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
dadudemon
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Bacta Tank.

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
And also the irony of a great deal of technology which developed after war was contributed by Nazis and Hitler's projects and such.


Jaden and I already had this debate. This is a false idea. The vast majority of technologies came from places other than the 3rd Reich. Proportionally, they actually developed significantly less than the US, before, during, and after WWII.



Edit - Sorry, I missed this:

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
It would not work. Never. You're talking about 2 billion people against however many people were in USA in 1930s/1940s.


It's actually modern US against WWII world. That'd be 310+ million against the rest.


__________________

Last edited by dadudemon on Sep 21st, 2009 at 11:07 PM

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 11:04 PM
dadudemon is currently offline Click here to Send dadudemon a Private Message Find more posts by dadudemon Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
jinXed by JaNx
Senior Member

Gender: Male
Location: Pittsburgh

Modern military technology would decimate WWII tech. The world would be surrendering within months if not weeks.


__________________
"If you tell the truth, you never have to remember anything" -Twain
(sig by Scythe)

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 11:44 PM
jinXed by JaNx is currently offline Click here to Send jinXed by JaNx a Private Message Find more posts by jinXed by JaNx Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
lil bitchiness
-

Gender: Female
Location: Limassol, Cyprus

Moderator

quote: (post)
Originally posted by dadudemon

It's actually modern US against WWII world. That'd be 310+ million against the rest.


Against 2 billion people?

And it is not full 310 mill + against 2 billion either, because children and elderly would not fight the war.


__________________

في هذا العالم ثلاثة أشخاص أفسدوا البشرية : راعي غنم , طبيب و راكب الجمال , و راكب الجمال هو أسوأ نشال و أسوأ مشعوذ بين الثلاثة

Old Post Sep 21st, 2009 11:58 PM
lil bitchiness is currently offline Click here to Send lil bitchiness a Private Message Find more posts by lil bitchiness Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
Symmetric Chaos
Fractal King

Gender: Male
Location: Ko-ro-ba

quote: (post)
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
Against 2 billion people?

And it is not full 310 mill + against 2 billion either, because children and elderly would not fight the war.


Well so long as that 2 billion includes non-combatants it's a valid comparison, better than just numbers of soldiers even.


__________________



Graffiti outside Latin class.
Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
A juvenal prank.

Old Post Sep 22nd, 2009 12:00 AM
Symmetric Chaos is currently offline Click here to Send Symmetric Chaos a Private Message Find more posts by Symmetric Chaos Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote Quick Quote
All times are UTC. The time now is 02:14 PM.
Pages (6): [1] 2 3 » ... Last »   Last Thread   Next Thread

Home » Community » General Discussion Forum » Modern day USA vs the entire world during WW2

Email this Page
Subscribe to this Thread
   Post New Thread  Post A Reply

Forum Jump:
Search by user:
 

Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON

Text-only version
 

< - KillerMovies.com - Forum Archive - Forum Rules >


© Copyright 2000-2006, KillerMovies.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by: vBulletin, copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.