Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Any Mathmaticians Out There?
It's actually a chemistry problem focusing on galvanic cells, and working with redox equations but I only need help on the last part with the math. Either the professor gave us the wrong answer or I'm doing something wrong.
Haven't taken Calculus in a while, can't remember steps. Do I inverse both sides? Any help would be appreciated.
0.711 = 0.679 - 0.0257/6 ln [(x)^2/(0.10)^3]
I'm not asking for answer, just how to get to it.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Dec 2nd, 2009 05:55 AM
King Kandy
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: United States
What are you trying to do, solve for x?
If that's the case, I think you'd subtract 0.679 from both sides, divide both sides by 0.0257/6, then put both sides as exponents of e, removing the natural log. Then it's easy to solve.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:02 AM
Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Sovling for x. Not sure if this is right though. The x exponent for e is what I'm having trouble with.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:10 AM
King Kandy
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: United States
e^ln(x)=x
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:12 AM
Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
quote: (post ) Originally posted by King Kandy
e^ln(x)=x
I got that part, but it's this that I can't remember how to do.
e^(x)^2/(0.10)^3
edit: nevermind, i see what you're saying.
edit: Got the answer. I appreciate the help King.
Answer: 7.5 x 10^4
Which is the concentration I needed to find the Ksp for InF3.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Last edited by Dr. Leg Kick on Dec 2nd, 2009 at 06:15 AM
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:13 AM
AthenasTrgrFngr
Don't wanna die...
Registered: Jun 2007
Location: No Russian
im not sure if its pathetic that i have no idea what youre talking about.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:46 AM
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CAModerator
Don't fret, I don't either.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 06:59 AM
Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
quote: (post ) Originally posted by BackFire
Don't fret, I don't either.
Hope you're watching the Kings games man. Haven't had a season like this in a while. Was thinking about getting tickets after finals.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Dec 2nd, 2009 07:16 AM
King Kandy
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: United States
Don't hesitate to ask any more questions. After implicit differentiation and related rates (ugh) this seemed easy. Man I can't wait for calculus to be over.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 07:39 AM
AsbestosFlaygon
The Original One
Registered: Jun 2008
Location: Hall of Origin
Man, i hate math
__________________
"Farewell, Damos... Ash, Pikachu... And you. All of my beloved." -- Arceus
Dec 2nd, 2009 08:15 AM
BackFire
Blood. It's nature's lube
Registered: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CAModerator
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Dr. Leg Kick
Hope you're watching the Kings games man. Haven't had a season like this in a while. Was thinking about getting tickets after finals.
Absolutely. Watched them beat the Ducks tonight. Quick made some amazing saves.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 08:21 AM
Bicnarok
From Ganymede
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Cydonia, Mars
Re: Any Mathmaticians Out There?
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Dr. Leg Kick
0.711 = 0.679 - 0.0257/6 ln [(x)^2/(0.10)^3]
well if someone can tell me what a "n [(x)^ " is, and wtf this is all about I might be able to help and learn something as well
Dec 2nd, 2009 09:31 AM
GCG
Red Bull
Registered: Jul 2004
Location:
why are you using ^ instead of * ?
__________________
Deferrals get you nowhere - Just Do It.........Or Ineptitude will consume your life like a Cancer
Dec 2nd, 2009 01:30 PM
Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
quote: (post ) Originally posted by King Kandy
Don't hesitate to ask any more questions. After implicit differentiation and related rates (ugh) this seemed easy. Man I can't wait for calculus to be over.
Finished Calc II a year in a half ago. Barely got a B in the class. Very boring stuff.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by BackFire
Absolutely. Watched them beat the Ducks tonight. Quick made some amazing saves.
Ya, I never heard of Quick before this season. He's doing well. Also glad we have Smyth on the team.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Dec 2nd, 2009 03:35 PM
Blinky
Android First Class
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: United States
How is that a Calculus problem? I see no differentiation or integration required. That looks like a college algebra problem.
__________________
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead."
Dec 2nd, 2009 04:01 PM
JacopeX
Restricted
Registered: May 2005
Location: EverywhereAccount Restricted
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Blinky
That looks like a college algebra problem.
Really?
__________________
(MEMBER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) The more you question it, the less you will understand.
Dec 2nd, 2009 04:26 PM
Blinky
Android First Class
Registered: Aug 2008
Location: United States
quote: (post ) Originally posted by JacopeX
Really?
Yeah really. Last time I had a problem that said "solve for X" it was probably in Pre-Calc, many years ago. I took 3 semesters of Calc, differential equations and Numerical Analysis - not once did I ever get a problem where I had to simply solve for X.
__________________
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead."
Dec 2nd, 2009 04:34 PM
King Kandy
Senior Member
Registered: Sep 2006
Location: United States
That's true, this does not require anything more than algebra.
__________________
Dec 2nd, 2009 04:43 PM
Dr. Leg Kick
Aesculapius
Registered: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
quote: (post ) Originally posted by Blinky
How is that a Calculus problem? I see no differentiation or integration required. That looks like a college algebra problem.
I remember using the function tons in calculus, maybe that's why I thought it was a calc problem.
quote: (post ) Originally posted by King Kandy
That's true, this does not require anything more than algebra.
Again, thanks for the help.
__________________
Life is short and the art long, the occasion instant, experiment perilous, decision difficult.
Dec 2nd, 2009 05:26 PM
Bardock42
Junior Member
Registered: Nov 2004
Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
__________________
Dec 3rd, 2009 02:01 AM
All times are UTC. The time now is 12:14 PM.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
Text-only version