Not saying AC sucks, it doesn't, but I've stop being into AC really since pt.2 While Batman's Arkham games just get better and better for me. Like, they're just more fun to play. Like it's a much better beat 'em up. AC's story is better though. But that's just me.
Imo, you definitely won't go wrong with Batman Origins if you had to pick outta the two.
__________________ "The darkside, Sidious, is an illness no true Sith wishes to be cured of, my young apprentice .."
I like both Ac is longer cause of the bigger landscape ,sidequest,hunting,treasure search..etc...
Im a big comic fan and Batman is awesome so I choose it over Ac.
Arkham Origins for me, AC is Good but it's timeline and Assassins are all over the Place, like it completely screws over Connor and doesn't continue his story, and we have Yet to have a BLACK ASSASSIN.
Batman on the Other hand just gets Better and Better and Origins Story IMO is Better than any of the previous Arkham games mainly because its more Focused, even though it SCREWS OVER BLACK MASK
I haven't played AC4 yet but if it's like other AC games, I would go for Batman.
One thing I like about the Batman games is that the side missions/collections are fun to play. There is a puzzle to them. I find in AC that a lot of them are collect a thons without any reason to them.
There is indeed a black assassin in black flag! He's a former slave turned assassin..
"Freedom Cry", planned downloadable content for Assassin's Creed 4: Black Flag, will star Adewale, a former slave and protagonist Edward Kenway's second-in-command, Ubisoft confirmed today."
Thats Because people are to Butt Hurt to admit that WB Montreal did a Good Job and had a Better Story than City and Bugs are nothin that cant be fixed with patches
That doesn't make sense. Why would reviewers be butt hurt about a company doing a good job? It doesn't affect them at all.
Also yes, bugs are something that can be patched, still worth mentioning, though. As some can be actual game breakers (such as one that corrupts your save game).
it very well does, every gamer that has played the Arkham Trilogy say this one is Better and has a more Focused story, but the critics are saying its repetitive magically when WB Montreal wants to make a Batman Game, it wasn't a problem for the last 2 made by Rocksteady but when WB wants to make a batman game, i gets hit with the repetitive card yet Call of Duty, Assassins Creed, and Battlefield are repetitive but no Game site is Complaining. i just find it odd that when a series that's being doing the same thing for the past 2 games, gets acclaimed but when another company wants to make the same game and add their input, their attacked with a bunch of BullSh!t so yeah Critics dont want to admit WB Montreal did a good job, or their Hypocrites
After beating it, the story was definitely not as good as City. The only thing this game did better than City was the boss fights. Montreal did do a good job though.