Spider-man movie should have been called manspider
This piece of crap phony neatutered version of Sonys should have been called manspider.they totally betrayed his character and the comic by making him into a manspider monster giving him organics.
You can go to hell sony for raping to death such a great character.
Yeah, mr Paker, that man spider crap cant be called spider man. Spidey is a guy with web shooters, and who is funny all the time. And the organics makes of him a freak, what a stupid idea.
To the first poster who replied, thats whats so dumb about it,is you just dont know what kind of a person he is anymore because of the freaking organics.I mean they have confused everybody for no damn good reason at all. I feel the same way,my state of mind is WHAT THE HELL?
thumbs down sign.
Hey dude,I have a right to come here to complain and be pissed about how hollywood screwed up this movie and made him into a manspider monster as much as you do to just praise the film.and sorry dude,but I seriously doubt the administraters of this site are going to close thread down just because you dont like seeing somebody bash that stupid manspider movie of sonys.
Yeh but the fact that he climbs walls already makes him genetically different
Plus its easy to "believe" that the web comes from his body instead of him making them in his room
Heres the problem with that argument,there is no logical justification to believe the webbing would shoot out of his wrists instead of his ass if he gained the power to shoot out of his body.
That is an stupid excuse, because there are many bizarre and unveliable things in the movie , peter creating a high tech costume, a guy with the spider powers with only a bite of a spider, a guy geting super strenght drinking a formula and flying in a glideder, etc, etc. All the spiderman things are unvelieble in the same way or more unvelieble than peter creating his own web, so why are those things in the movie and not the web shooters?
Whether you realize this or not,thousands of fans cared and to hell it doesnt matter.Hes a monster now and its only great if your a manspider fan and not a spiderman fan anymore.
He's not a monster, he's a superhero with genetically, altered, super powers! Hulk is a monster. But Spider-man is a mutant because he was bit by the spider. I am also sorta pissed about him not having web shooters but they didn't ruin the franchise. And what the hell are you talking about (manspider) moron.
__________________ Ok ok now I've got it...If you cooked anymore slowely you wouldn't need an egg timer you'd need an egg calander HAHAHAHA...oh that's right...I went there
-Stewie
Sigh... purirsts- always irritating people, also people who are irritatED because the film did so damn well which suggests to me that the makers did nothing wrong.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
Point stands. You cannot expect the movie to be like the film in all respects; the makers felt having him able to naturally shoot web worked better and I cannot see any reason that convinces me this was a bad thing. People should just learn to seperate source and film; it's the same problem with Lord of the Rings.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
KMC Community Forums
Spider-man movie should have been called manspider
Sep 17th, 2003 04:03 PM
