little note their Ush:
you've put a lot of you (refering to To) there, but it's not only To who supports the attacks, I think that it is better that you write USA or something like that instead.
I know it sounds stupid and is off-topic but I mean... it was strange for me to read it
What did you all think was going to happen? Bombs miss targets..it's a fact of life. This is war..this is what happens. It might very well be a PR campaign but I do think that something had to happen in reaction to Sept 11th.. And the way I look at it is that we really should have stepped up to the plate as far as Taliban goes a long time ago. It kind of reminds me of how we didn't want to get involved with what Hitler was doing until we ended up getting bombed in 1941.
I think we do need to find Bin Ladin because that was the whole point ( I figured that the Bush admin would end up saying that it might not be possible) and I think the best thing to do as far as Afganistan is concerned we should put the king and his people back in charge and get out of dodge..if we can get rid of the Taliban of course.
Okay so maybe I don't really mean leave it..but I don't think that an USA set up goverment is the right thing..I think the Afghani people need to decide where they want to go and I think the king is the best person to take them though that transition.
Couldn't be more true.
War will always bring casualties and often innocent ones thats just the way it is. If the Taliban are so sure of winning why are the hiding and let innocent take the rap???
I agree with peace. We gave the Taliban an entire month to give over bin Ladin before we attacked. Then, Bush gave them another chance in the middle of that attacks, they still didn't hand him over.
I wish we could always live in peace, but these people want Americans destroyed, and you can't talk peace with them.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 28th, 2001 12:02 PM
