I'm calling you a hypocrite for this snide, ironic remark..
Like I said, that's like the pot calling the kettle black. You did the exact same thing Re: "Star Wars".
It isn't because I don't agree with you, it's because you're actually being a hypocrite. I'm just pointing that out for your own well being, not to make fun of you.
the movie was ok..i'm glad i didnt waste money at the theatre...the directors cut ending was better than the oringal ending..it made more sense and went along with the story better
What the hell does understanding your taste in movies have to do with the fact you tell people not to make a big deal of pathetic little details, and you do it yourself!?
Gender: Male Location: somewhere in Canada i hope.
k he hates star wars becuase the CG sucks well true it does but when a movie surrond its self around the CG its not a small detail. so really i dont think he's a hypocrite. but thats my view on so go ahead CD call me stupid becuase are views differ once again.
__________________
dont mind my poor grammer skills. I still can make a point.
Remember the "Star Wars" thread, where you basically said that you didn't understand why people liked the movie, because it had bad special effects, although it was 1977?
Then, in this very thread, you had this to say:
Don't forget..
Is this registering with you now?
Well, Mr. Buttinski, we're referring to the Original Trilogy, namely, "Star Wars: A New Hope", which actually had minimal special effects. Where you got CGI from is beyond me.
Stormy has a hang up about "Star Wars", a movie made in 1977, because of it's seemingly cheesy, (while the other 99% of the world sees it is groundbreaking) special effects.
In the meantime, he's calling other people "pathetic" for disliking a movie for one small detail. A detail as small as the quality of the special effects in an old Sci Fi movie.
If that's not being a hypocrite, according to everyone on this board..then I'll eat shit.
Like Vengeance said the most of the stars wars Original Trilogy is focused on the cgi which I found cheesy.For its time no,but for now its just ridiculous that so many fans are still hanging on
Well, if Vengeance were actually right, and if I weren't a fellow Christian, I'd absolutely love to bash your skulls in with a 10 ton hammer, for all this mindless droning.
Did you even know that CGI and Special Effects are 2 different things?
Did you know that CGI did not even exist in 1975?
Did you know there were only 545 special effects shots in "Star Wars"
Finally.....
Would you like to know how many special effects shots were rendered for "Attack of the Clones", all by it's lonesome?
2,817 Yes, that is Two Thousand, Eight Hundred, and Seventeen.
That would beeeeeee..2,272 shots LESS than the original "Star Wars" movie that sooooo heavily relied on that non existant CGI!
Get your facts straight if your going to debate something, or don't ****ing say anything at all.
lol you act so dumb sometimes.You try to make me look stupid all because I got mixed up.How do you have time to get all these facts dont you have a life ?
You're not mixed up, kiddo, you just don't know anything. There's a difference. In addition, I am not out to make you look dumb, you do that all by yourself by engaging in conversations either not knowing what you're talking about, contradicting yourself, or backing yourself into a corner with no way out.
I've got a life, and how I choose to spend my free time is my decision.
I'd suggest getting a life of your own, because it's become more and more obvious that you're trying to ride my coattails, if you wish to admit or deny such a claim is up to you.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 21st, 2004 01:10 AM
some movies I like some movies I dont 
