You made that abundantly clear when Alec and Mr. Zero were done explaining themselves. No twisting of words there. You should, however, take your own advice.
Just keep that in mind, so we don't have to go through it all over again.
Cinemaddiction has a very good point here, Stormy. You're willing to overlook huge plot holes in TBE but criticise Star Wars because of some dated special effects ?
Gender: Male Location: somewhere in Canada i hope.
i really think though stormy my have some leway on this becuase the star wars movie's are completly surroned by special effects, and if they suck as bad as they actually do then it kinda make it feel fake for the viewer. i still liked all 3 old star wars movies but i have to say that the special effects in star wars are no small pote hole.
__________________
dont mind my poor grammer skills. I still can make a point.
There were only 545 in the first "Star Wars" movie, which is what is being argued. There were 2,844 created for the "Attack of the Clones" alone.
"Star Wars: A New Hope" isn't reliant on special effects. Once again, since it was one of the very first movies WITH special effects in it, how can you be critical of it, especially in 1977?
He has no leeway, and special effects can't be a plot hole, as it has nothing to do with the story. It's a cop-out excuse to dislike a movie, which Stormy chose to ignore for the sake of branding himself a hypocrite.
Gender: Male Location: somewhere in Canada i hope.
well all im saying is that i think it can, cuase i no if i watch really old movie i cant really get into them cuase the shit is way to fake. and its really bad when your stormy's age. so dont crap your pants lol.
__________________
dont mind my poor grammer skills. I still can make a point.
KMC Community Forums
Jul 22nd, 2004 08:36 AM
