It's not an argument. It's you legendary reputation you've built yourself on this forum.
Rather not go back in forth arguing against your false interpretation of the recent fight between Thor and Surfer. I thought it was a stalemate, you thought that Surfer was getting a butt whooping of a lifetime. You are literally the only one on this forum that thinks Thor was whooping Surfer's butt, when almost everyone else (even Rage and Khazra) think it was roughly a stalemate give or take. But okay, hold on to your delusions.
Makes sense, since without Loki's amp Surfer would only possess power that "was a fraction of what it once was."
What? Upgrades are suppose to be dismissed according to you? What does it even matter? We saw how post-annihilation Surfer did against Thor currently, and it was a stalemate
PIS doesn't count, and Surfer let him armbar him to get information out of BP. We know later on Surfer said he could incinerate BP with a thought.
Are you serious? Your counter-argument is to just dismiss my argument and plug your ears and say "Nope" and "Stop." Stop avoiding my points and address them, but until you actually do that, I'll accept your concession.
Says the person with the notorious reputation.
It's amazing how much an advantage you get if you start a fight with a surprise sucker shot, unlike Surfer who created an advantage when the fight already started.
In your Bizzaro world maybe, no one's buying it I'm afraid.
No it doesn't, you throw the word retcon around like candy during Halloween. It doesn't retcon his depowerement at all. You're taking a totally random scene that happened decades later which has nothing to do with his depowerement, and taking an out of context statement, and trying to pass it as a retcon that he was never depowered? Even worse is that it has no logical consistency whatsoever. Again, part of your reputation.
Surfer (decades later): I gather energy from space and accidentally burned a hole in the ozone = I was never depowered at all, even though I clearly was, and made references to it multiple times.
This is as bad as you trying to pass off the scan of Surfer drinking tea as a retcon too, which made me burst out laughing.
That shows yet another reference to Surfer's depowerement. How does that mean he was replenished to full power? He can still channel power from the cosmos, but to lesser extent due to being weakened.
Read below.
No it doesn't. Again, stop making stuff up. The barrier doesn't block his ability to gather energy into Earth or himself. It only blocks his surf board from passing through.
Here Surfer is trapped under the barrier and he can still channel and gather energy from "the endless cosmos" and uses it to blast the Flying Dutchman.
Again, the barrier doesn't so sh*t except block his board. The depowerment was to his personal reserves and nearly killed him. But the FF4 stopped it before it could, but it left him extremely weakened.
Stop trying to make outlandish claims to prove Surfer was full power when he fought Thor. He clearly wasn't.
The scan you posted happened decades after the Thor fight. If Surfer did re-absorb his power in that scan, it would mean it did it decades after the Thor fight. So I don't see any argument here.
Surfer stated his power was a "fraction" of what he once possessed. So it does matter. Surfer also said his power could destroy a galaxy. I take statements, unless backed up by action, with a grain of salt. Like Spiderman saying Sentry beat Galactus.
That Surfer might have had Loki's amp, but he only had a fraction of his original power when he fought Thor.
Yeah, Surfer was actually winning, and had Thor at his mercy. Again, Surfer claimed his power could destroy a galaxy. Statements don't mean much until backed up.
Don't play coy. It got to the point where Pr was begging you to stop posting Superman scans.
__________________
Last edited by One-Punch on Feb 20th, 2014 at 06:50 PM
Another thing, his energy blasts can destroy planets, Thor's lightning or energy (including godblast) has never destroyed something that massive. He needs to rely on physically hitting with his hammer to do what Silver Surfer does with a casual blast.
Technically Surfer should be much faster (movement speed) than Thor. This should make it extremely hard (if not impossible) for Thor to land any significant blows.
Surfer has his problems too.
His blasts against heralds are just not very powerful.
Surfer can wreck the hell out of some fodder though.
But if Surfer was allowed to blast Thor for a few seconds then how much damage do you think Thor will accrue?
KMC Community Forums
Feb 19th, 2014 05:55 PM
