Ha. Ok man idk where you're getting the idea that I'm starting a fight when your first response to me was a pissed off argument.
Anybody will agree with me on these points:
-the fact that YOU saw an interview does not prove to me, or anybody else, that it is a fact, no matter how many times you say it. If you can give me a link to the interview and I can watch it myself, then I'll take your word for it, but you simply telling me that you saw something does not make it true. If I told you I saw Bigfoot does that mean I'm not lying? No.
-you don't know who I am and you don't know my potential, so attacking me and saying I'll never be in Hollywood does not help prove your point, it just makes you look desperate that you can't back up what you're saying.
-as Paola so thankfully said already, remember to watch your language. I haven't started this argument, I was replying to a post of yours and if I may say so, I wasn't rude or anything of the sort. I haven't been even now, and I haven't resorted to cursing you off, which you shouldn't either.
-Hopkins and the Lecter role was 3 films, and that's all it will ever be. He does not risk being typecast as much as the others, especially considering the gaps between the films. If you make films and their sequels rapidly that means the actors get less projects in between to distinguish themselves, and they become stuck. That is why James Bond films are like that, because they generally do one every 2 or 3 years, which doesn't allow 007's actor to have any big projects in between.
-this is a message board, it is used for discussion and arguing. Your point has not been backed up by absolutely anything but "listen I know you don't know me, and I have no connections, and I have no proof, of any sort, but trust me..", and thusly, I cannot accept it as a fact.
Then accept my middle finger with the fact that I don't like you, and you can kiss my ass. I know what I saw, and know what I heard, and you can not believe me all day. It doesn't mean you're right. I saw it on E! a short while after the first movie came out, so look on there if you can find it, but it was a while back. I'm done arguing.
How much I like Venom in this film...I just don't see how they could connect Sandman and Venom in the same film...There has to be a connection...Imdb says that venom is in the film, but wasn't that just on the word of kirsten dunst? so yeah my opinion...no venom!
__________________
"The greatest hero is the one who learns to face his fears and overconquers it!"
The fact that you don't like me is ok, people are entitled to their opinions. The rudeness I think is a testament of character, as the rest of your posts on this subject have been, and of course I would never kiss your ass.
You know what you saw, you know what you heard...ok, but nobody else does.
The fact that I don't believe you does not make me right. But that still, as I've mentioned before, does not prove you right either. I found no such interview at E!, so I stand by my previous notion, and the normal idea that we have at KMC - no proof means we can't believe you for sure. This isn't something new we've made up, we've been saying it for a while. That's why we don't say that Venom is 100% for sure in Spider-Man 3...because we have no proof of it yet. If there would be a big thing on Sony's website that said "In the process of filming Spider-Man 3/7" or anything along the sorts that indicates 7 films, I would believe you...but there isn't. I'm not even gonna bother to ask for an apology of the supposedly rude comments you said that were edited out, because it doesn't bother me whatsoever, but if you continue to do that everytime someone disagrees with you on this board, you're gonna get banned really fast.
I think we should try and keep this subject as factual as possible. This would require people to post a source for their information. So if I wanted to say "Kirstin Dunst said that Spider-Man dies" in an interview I would have to say when the interview was done, who it was done with (TV Guide, Entertainment Tonight, Extra, etc) and so on.
Simply saying "I heard in an interview" isnt exactly something we can take with anymore than a grain of salt. There is such a thing as human error after all. Perhaps someone didnt hear the question corretly, maybe they interpreted what was said in an incorrect fashion.
Im not going to say Marcus4600 is wrong. I fully believe that he is 100% behind what he heard. The problem is maybe he heard something like "they could have signed me for 7 movies" or something that sounded close to what he is saying.
regardless, without proper source referance it would be unwise to believe anything said.
honestly I have Im hoping that venom is in the film but why stick a crappy villain like sandman in he turns good in the comics whats with that I hope they dont do it in the movie Ive heard rumors that hobgoblins in it or GG2 being harry osbourne i dont want another GG he's getting on my nerves hobgoblin would be a nice twist though.
oh and by the way there is 6 movies coming out I've saw that interveiw shes right and even if she was wrong thats no reason for youse to fight shes a girl dude and the way its coming across youre bullying her where I come from thats a serious offence and another thing you will get kicked out trust me so lets make it good for everybody and QUIT THE FIGHTING
KMC Community Forums
Because
Jan 20th, 2006 02:30 PM
make him be online same time as you and I won't ban you 
