Oh I didn't know answering your posts was compulsory. I better read the KMC Rule Book again.
Besides, they were already answered before you joined the debate. You just read one or two last posts of a convo, butt in start all over again. You could have read before you post.
If they were answered already then why don't you quote your "answers" from a previous page? Doesn't sound too difficult. Especially since this particular discussion on this subject came up in the last few pages.
OKay... so letting someone repeat himself because he's too lazy to read two pages back IS polite?
The 'particular subject' came up a few pages before that. We were just finishing. I'm not gonna do all that quoting and posting just to endulge your laziness.
Well, more polite than simply ignoring me. I don't think I'm the only person having problems with you doing this as Devil King and Bardock42 have also made clear.
I didn't think you answered the questions a few pages back to my specific phrasing, hence why I asked it. Not because I was lazy. Yeah though, blame it on that. Inept answers seem to be your thing.
1. I didn't ignore you, I told you we already discussed everythking as you can read (this is three times by now)
2. Did you bother to check the debate I had before that at all???? If you didn't, then you don't know if your question was answered or not
3. There is no LAW that one should answer the same question several times... over and over again. Asking a question and not listening to the answer is also considered impolite, even if you don't get the answer you expect. I'm not a candy machine that you can press buttons and get what you want.
Now we need the luxury of people who can read.
__________________
Last edited by queeq on Feb 24th, 2008 at 11:06 PM
Now just to look at your question... let's analyse it first.
1. You assume I draw some kind of set conclusion and make statements. That is wrng, if you had read all that stuff before, you would have noticed I was posing a question.
2. The 'logic' you so POLITELY called stupid was not really there, because I was not making any theory or POV, I was, again, posing a question. I used some examples to explain why I was wondering.
So here's your answer: I don't care about your sexual orientation. What do you want from me? Sex? Or to tell you you are straight?
1. Yeah, you told me that NOW. You never addressed my posts prior and said that.
2.) MY PHRASING
3.) I never said there was a law. Addressing my post in the first place wouldn't place you in this position, instead of just answering me whenever you wish. I'm glad you're not a candy machine. Because if I had to place money in you every time to get a ****ing packet of M&Ms I'd be down $100. Also, candy machines actually seem to be helpful.
lol....you just pulled a dadudemon with your numbering...
Anyway....usually, if someone asks me to answer a question that I have more than answered, if I am feeling nice, I quote it for them....if I am feeling lazy, I tell them to just check back a few pages for my answer.
Edit...it looks like you did the latter...so I am failing to see what the problem is....
Wait...it looks like Kramer is wanted you to answer his question specifically.
KMC Community Forums
Feb 24th, 2008 10:35 PM
come on ; we have the luxury of having text written.
