I dont know how the Daredevil movie came into discussion on this thread,but since it did,Daredevil was MUCH better than these god awful man-spider movies.Daredevil was more of an adult film where the man-spider movies are made mostly for kids. and I hate to blow your theory,but your wrong, no me and spider-venom are not the same person and there are 3 votes there not 2.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Oct 24th, 2004 at 06:33 PM
Anyway if you would have been paying attention when I said there was two votes there was actually two votes. Then AFTER I posted there was three votes.
The characters and the story in daredevil are more tragic and realistic and adult than the man spider characters. The main villain, kingpin, is someone that we could see easily in the real life, a big gangster who controls the crime in a city. But I doubt that we can see people like the green goblin or doctor octopus in real life.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
ha ha,you got the funniest logic I have ever seen.to say the man-spider films are faithful is absurd and ludicrise.The daredevil movies are far more faithful to the source material than these crappy man-spider movies are .You call Kirsten Dunst talented? ha ha thats a laugh.Unlike Jk simmons and William Defoe who understood their characters,its either the fault of the script writers or Kirsten dunst or my guess is both, because Dunst clearly does not understand the character of Mary Jane at all because if you ever read the comics you would understand that her character in the movie doesnt even come close to the character in the comics and that it was only about 10% mj in the movie and 90% gwen stacy,that her character was MUCH MUCH closer to the character of gwen stacy than MJ.Your logic is laughable as always.Bakerboy just pointed out so well why Dardevil is an adult film and the man-spider movies arent.
and please dont start making ludicrise idiotic statements that me and bakerboy are the same person because he lives in spain and I live in the states.
__________________
Last edited by Mr Parker on Oct 24th, 2004 at 09:52 PM
bakerboy you are criticising the Spider-Man characters saying they are not realisitc. Last time I checked they were COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS!! and they are not suppose to be completely realistic or they would not be interesting to read or look at.
Mr. Parker you arguement is useless no matter how many times you bash Dunst that does nto change the fact that Ben Affleck is untalented and that Spider-Man is a much better film in all aspects.
Ok how about we do this count how many talented actors/actress there were in Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2, then count how many there were in Daredevil.
Mr. Parker you arguement is useless no matter how many times you bash Dunst that does nto change the fact that Ben Affleck is untalented and that Spider-Man is a much better film in all aspects.
Ok how about we do this count how many talented actors/actress there were in Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2, then count how many there were in Daredevil. [/B][/QUOTE]
Ben Affleck is not untalented.Give me a break.If he was, he never would have been cast in the main role in the first place.To say he did a horrible job of delivering his lines like Chris O'donnel did in Batman forever is crazy.You remind of all these mods at kryptonsite who make absurd statements that Kristen Kreuk's acting sucks on Smallville and everything else she does and they talk about how Allison Mack is so great on that show when Kreuks acting is in fact very impressive in that show .Give me a break,I have studied acting before,and i dont see anything wrong with Ben Affleck In Daredevil.No, MAN-SPIDER is much worse than Daredevil in all aspects.Since there has only been one Daredevil movie made,then its not fair to compare 2 movies to just one but as long as we are comparing the first man-spider to daredevil,then lets start with the two main characters.Ben Affleck was a good Matt Murdock in his portrayel and acting in that movie.Tobey Mcguire although his acting surprised me and did a good job as Peter Parker,he was a terrible choice for the role because his voice sucks and for a character like spider-man,having a good voice for the role is imperative.While daredevil could have been a better film by going into detail about Kingpins life and how he came into power,which is where those extra 30 minutes would have come in handy,I honestly thought I would be dissapointed with Daredevil because of the running time,but I was pleasantly surprised.,It had more positives than negatives where man-spider had far more negatives than positives about it.
Not, you should be banned, man spider fans, for your nazi way of expressing. All the people have the right on posting their opinion, and that is the only thing that mr parker is doing.
And not wrong again, the spiderman characters in the comics are great characters, but in the man spider movie, they are ruined for an awful script and terrible performances, exept willem dafoe as osborn, rosemary harris as aunt may and j k simmons as jameson. The rest was crap. And Kirsten dunst sucked as bad as the rest of the cast. The characters in daredevil are from the comics too, but they are much better played, and in the superman movies too.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
KMC Community Forums
Oct 24th, 2004 04:18 AM
im sick of seeing Dark Phoenix!! when are you gonna be Elektra??
