i think its sad how kerry had everybody thinking he would end the war when he himself said he would have went to war with iraq he just would have done it difrent not one person has been able to me why kerry woul;d be a better president other then that bush is bad and bush is an ******* can someone who wanted kerry to win please give me a valid reason why
__________________ Nothing but Losers Bitter Legacy
Cool Places to Hang Out For Central Valley Music PowerSlave 209 Productions
<a href="http://www.cultivatingthemasses.com"><img src="http://www.crematoriummusic.com/images/tour_link1.jpg"></a>
__________________ Nothing but Losers Bitter Legacy
Cool Places to Hang Out For Central Valley Music PowerSlave 209 Productions
<a href="http://www.cultivatingthemasses.com"><img src="http://www.crematoriummusic.com/images/tour_link1.jpg"></a>
Gender: Male Location: between apathy and indifference
Valid reason #1 Kerry would bring a measure of respectability between the USA and Foriegn Nations
Valid reason #2 Kerry would not be as brutal on the enviroment as Bush's policies have been
Valid reason #3 Kerry seeks to resolve an international situation with international participation and international approval
Valid reason #4 None of Kerry's associates are directly financially profitting from a unethical war that he started
Valid reason #5 Although many of his decisions have been questioned and ridiculed Kerry's record of honesty is a heck of alot better than Bush's
Valid reason #6 Bush's campaign felt it neccessary to question a vietnam vetran's actions in the field and integrity when he returned home while their candidate avoided the conflict all together and spent his time drinking and doing coke
Any of those reasons good enuff for you?
__________________ "I made a typo bif deal" - JacopeX
1) No WMD were found and as other people have said Bush knew that there was none.
2) Osama bin Laden is still alive and America no longer has my sympathy if another terrorist attack happens.
3)Saddam Hussein may have been a strict leader but at least he kept the Iraqies under control.Now because he is gone there is a civil war between different groups of people trying to take control of Iraq.
4)I don't understand why the war in Iraq has got something to do with the your freedom.
5)The main reason why Bush attacked Iraq is because Saddam Hussein was the strongest Muslim leader to stand against him. Now without any other leaders he can help Israel take control of Palestine.
Why don't you read newspapers instead of just writing here what you are told.
But why should a person who doesn't actually get teh most votes become president? Sorry, that simply doesn't make sense. Seems last time he won through a loophole rather then through credibility.
Whatever the case, this time he won cleanly no matter how you look at it, so it doesn't matter.
1 and 3 are about the same and i was allways thought you should not care what everyone thinks of you
2 is all right if you are into the enviroment
4 depends if you think the war is ethical or not plaus ive seen kerry say himself that he did not plan to end the war and he would have still went just handled it difrently
5 all politicains lie
6 both sides did alot of mudslinging this election
__________________ Nothing but Losers Bitter Legacy
Cool Places to Hang Out For Central Valley Music PowerSlave 209 Productions
<a href="http://www.cultivatingthemasses.com"><img src="http://www.crematoriummusic.com/images/tour_link1.jpg"></a>
He won because he did best at the rules of the contest he was playing.
Few democracies elect leaders by popular vote. It is a misapprehension to believe that that is the function of a democracy. Like I say, that function is local representation.
__________________
"We've got maybe seconds before Darth Rosenberg grinds everybody into Jawa burgers and not one of you buds has the midi-chlorians to stop her!"
The electoral college has its points. I see the reason for it. I do not want densely populated states dictating who the president will be. Farmers would suffer. Low population dense states supply the basics for living. Corn and other basic grain goods, cotton, and tobacco are all produced in Iowa, Georgia, Nebraska, and South Dakota etc.
__________________
Last edited by kingcoot on Nov 3rd, 2004 at 07:44 PM
Well the electoral college is meant to go hand in hand with the popular vote. I doubt when they made the electoral college they wanted it to be a possibility that the person who gets the least amount of votes could win.
The popular vote goes hand in hand with the electoral by state, and not popular vote from New York or California to drain into Iowa. You know I'd not like other voters out of my state voting for my state's decision. United States, not Cities.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 3rd, 2004 06:41 PM
