i agree with zombieman. it makes you sound like a racist saying that having people who are gay in the hp books are wrong. their is nothing wrong with homosexuality. they are still humans aren't they?
Gender: Female Location: Tragic Town, Mississippi, United St
I was reading this topic and saw this post:
"Well. . .also it would have nothing to do with the plot of the story. . it kinnda drives the story away from the plot"
And it made we wonder if everyone says homosexualism shouldn't matter and should be treated the same as normal male on female love how would it drive the story from the plot?If homosexuality were to be treated equal then wouldn't that mean hookups like Harry and Cho are driving it from the plot too?In a simpler way...if Cho and Harry aren't considered "icky" then why should a gay couple be?Wizards are normal people too with the same drama except theres more magic.People's love should be treated equal.I also don't see why JK should stop at really intense or dark moments just because children read the books too.It wouldn't be fair to teens or older people who are screaming for more action.I dunno...that's just my opinion on the subject. =/
Gender: Male Location: England; at least it's not the U.S.
It would be totally wrong to have it in the Harry Potter novels; whether anyone accepts it or not, it remains to this day a taboo subject and is considered by large majorities of people wrong. Distorting a novel such as Harry Potter for the sake of representing people equally would destroy a truly great set of stories.
Sirius and Lupin were gay... that is until Sirius bit the dust, and Tonks (being Sirius' relative) reminds Lupin of his former lover- which is Sirius. AHH, the irony! LOL~! Tonks seduced Lupin, and so Lupin had to get over Sirius, and thus he became straight. HAHA.
there aren't eny gays in HP because i think JK is against it.... think.. she whrites the book.. so it's her choice if ther should be gays or not in the book
__________________ outside im only a big beautiful butterfly but inside me there's a little ugly maggot who just wanna come out..
The king may control the man, but the man controls hes soul
Gender: Male Location: England; at least it's not the U.S.
I doubt she is, but she's quite right not to put any in! They aren't treated equally, produce wildly different reactions than normal relationships, and as such would be driving the plot away from its primary purpose.
Probably because Homosexuals are a very small minority and the majority find there practices disgusting. No one will probably own up to it of course in fear of being politically incorrect.
Homosexuality is a sin, and unnatural. Hey Im politicaly incorrect sue me.
Gender: Male Location: Past the Point of No Return
Go die... Screw those people, it will show the bad peole in the world. (OK, I'm not saying put gays in, but yea... I'm against people who are against gay people) Yep.
__________________
Thank you Neha for the sig!
This years Musical: Little Shop of Horrors (sig for it hopefully coming soon)
in what way is that wrong? all because their is homesexuality, doesn't mean the novel will be ruined. The actor of Gandalf, he's gay, yet people still think he did a great job in LOTR's...
KMC Community Forums
Oct 20th, 2005 09:17 PM
He's here, he's queer...! 
