And yeah, I'm with GF. But c' mon. Even though I judge sigs not by their looks, but by the technical skill applied on them, to anyone who is not familiar with sigmaking, techincal skill means nothing. As long as it looks good in their eyes.
__________________
Last edited by Col. Valerian on Nov 6th, 2008 at 10:03 PM
OK Am I supposed to give a good rating just because someone put alot of work into a sig but I dont really care for the end result?
Ad the whole "rating sigs my sigmaker" is bullshit. Scythe and I arent exactly buxom buddies and I regularly give him a 10, because his sigs usually kick ass. I rate honestly, maybe I am not as qualified as say Mywi or Speed, or say Piggle, because they are masters, but does that mean I am not supposed to rate at all?
__________________
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
All the ways you wish you could be, that's me. I look like you wanna look, I **** like you wanna ****, I am smart, capable, and most importantly, I am free in all the ways that you are not.
Yeah, you should. I'll give a sig a good rating even if the person didn't do that great a job but really put their best into it, because that to me shows potential.
Badwolf's sig, I can tell a mile off, is well made. How about you go beyond just looking at the image and thinking "i dunt like it lolol 5", is that how you see art? Just a painting? Plenty of great works of art I don't really care for, but however, it's well made either way.
"Not as qualified as..." Haha, you're not qualified at all. You're not even a sigmaker. Seriously.
0. No effort, care, or skill used at all. Probably slapped up under a minute.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 6th, 2008 08:36 PM
Am I supposed to give a good rating just because someone put alot of work into a sig but I dont really care for the end result?
