I dont recall ever trying. There are several reasons why I dont, the first being your unwillingess to use logic and your belief that evidence is irrelevant.
You said that necessary evidence doesnt matter. That speaks for itself. Clearly you have no willingness to be objective.
Were you objective, you would know that there is a need for transitional evidence. You clearly said that the lack of evidence is irrelevant. Again, ive requested several times that you just ignore me and I will do the same.
Guess what... I'm a creationist... and I believe in evolution... I find no problem between the two.... things got created, then evolved to suit the changing environment... whats so hard about that....
finch beaks!!!!!!
haha give me a break man
so is a poodle proof of evidence for evolution too man?
Its called adaptation PhilO, there are breeds of dogs that can live in extreme freezing temps and there are dogs that can live in the hottest climates on earth. Now if you switch the dogs in those climates they will be hard pressed to survive. This is a example of adaptation just like finch beaks. They can adapt through different climates but they never turn into another animal.
You can bring all the "proof" to the table you want over evolution but every shred of evidence i have ever heard of has been shot down. If you want to try to post some "proof" feel free to try I am quite confident i can shoot it down for you.
Evolution is a not a fact it is a theory!!!!!
and i don't know why you are so insulting to click click calling him stupid. He seems to have a above average intelligence to me.
Your the guy whos posting a thread of what a fact evolution is when all those great facts are highly questioned. Not to call you an idiot either, you probably just need to do a little more research.
And not to say i know everything on the subject as well, i am learning just as much as everyone else, i just know enough that stating finch beaks as a fact for evolution is a mass of bull dung
KMC Community Forums
Feb 9th, 2005 02:55 PM
