Heh, Big responsobility. I started renting my own apartment on New Years. You gotta pay the rent, buy food, then somehow manage to save money for the ring.
granted when i was twenty i slept with a girl that was 14,we were friends and stuff just happened and i dont regret it and now that i am 21 i am with a girl who is 17,we are both happy but we here about the age thing all the time
__________________ almost wrote a song about you today but i tore it all up and i threw it away
Registered: Sep 2004
Location: Lost in her eyes...
An interesting question. Here in Australia the "age of consent" is 16 (except for homosexuals, who for some reason are 18), also interesting is that the world health organisation recently stated how in the last two years case of Sexually transmitted diseases in girls as young as 14 has doubled (primarily chlamydia) though not due to contact with men older then them, but rather boys there same age.
Personally I think 16 is still a bit to young, but then I also see it appears people are growing up a lot faster and become, it appears, more sexually exploitative at younger ages. So is it wrong for a 20 year old to be with a 16 year old? It depends on the people in question, so I would give a yes and no.
__________________
From even the greatest of horrors irony is seldom absent.
maby im just jufgemental but if a girl freely and willingly has sex at 14,15 shit like that.....she's a whore to me anyway......like those chicks who end up on the Maury show.....but all in all they re my type of whores tho
"I was actually referring to the younger teenage years...13-17"
Whether you think it's RIDICULOUS or not, it's not 'wrong' purely because they are legal. 16 is average legal age. Anyone of or above that age being dated by a 20 year old is perfectly legal. I thought the age gap in the US, for relationships at least, was seen to be 5 years max. In which case 16-20 is 4.
Thats a different story though, he allegedly commited acts of pedophelia, and here I think it kinda goes by the moral sxcale of things. Whats worse? A 20 year old sleeping with a 16 year old? Or a 4o something year old boozing 12 year olds and sleeeing with them? Plus him being a star of sutch calibre doesnt help the situation.
__________________
What is this I don't even
Last edited by Kostabot on Feb 26th, 2005 at 12:01 PM
Yeah but that doesn't change the fact that it really has nothing to do with anyone besides those involved. Of course it's gonna get out but it's nothing to do with anyone else, if we're being technical.
People say "Well I want my kids safe". As if Jackson is some lecherous door to door paedophile.
All this and he still hasn't even been convicted. People suck.
My point was, that you are correct. It's between the two people and if they are both legal, there is nothing wrong. If your moral fabric is torn by what they are doing, despite it being legal........deal. None of your business.
"Is it okay for at 16-year old to have sex with a 20-year old?"
Seeing as the Danish minimum sexual age is 15, the answer is "yes".
__________________ "Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities."
-Voltaire
"That includes ruining Halloween because someone swallowed a Bible."
"I just thought you were a guy."
"... Most guys do."
Registered: Dec 2002
Location: Ucky Kingdom/Amador, CA
I don't see a problem with it ... as long as she/he doesn't look and act 12. If it was the same age difference but older no one would batter an eye lid, so I don't see why that is wrong, it already happens with a much larger age difference.
By the way -- David Duchovny is Hot :P
Feb 25th, 2005 06:54 PM
