I saw GoF yesterday and I'm definetly going again.
Though they could easely have done a better job. For instance, two movies. One's just to short.
They should have sticked to the book more.
They should have put in more Draco. (he looked fantastic in GoF!)
They should have given Fleur, Krumm and Cedric more lines.
They really should have picked someone else for Moody. Though the actor did a great job, I've always pictured him completely diffrent.
They should make Dan stop smiling, forever. For good. He's just terribly ugly when he smiles.
Though there were many many great scenes in the film, like the dragon scenes (not like the book though, but the dragons looked great), the gravejard scene (my fav in the book, they did it really good. Better than I expected) the death scene (brilliant!), Rupert was as great as ever! OMG, he just IS Ron. Emma did a pretty good Hermione, though I dont like her in general. Dan is acting a bit better. He's learning. The bathtub scene was hillarious!
Furthermore I loved the whole darkness in the whole film.
Voldemort was great! Looked really awsome!
And ofcourse, my beloved Weasley twins were fantastic!
__________________
Last edited by Rave X on Nov 25th, 2005 at 07:24 PM
The book's only supposed to be a reference point for the movie. besides, they also kept important things in. I personally think you shouldn't compare the two. They're good in their own way. look at the Lord of the Rings movies. they took out a lot of stuff from the book in those movies, but that was good. sorry... I just felt like pointing that stuff out
what the heck the movie was..!!
they are all over-acting, esp emma watson (if u ask..)
waahh, i kinda like her in the previous hp movie..
but what a mess she had done....
but well, (not all scenes..) she had done also a good job in other scenes..
...
who i admire now was the phelps' twins..
waah, they're getting hotter.. ; )
__________________ "NOw, if you two don't mind...
I'm going to bed..
before either one of you..
come up bad to another clever I did..
and get us killed, or worst..
ExPeLLed..."
and also..
i had been expectin' many scenes in the movie..
like dobby, winky..
the dursley's fireplace..
molly weasley's letter for the dursley with many stamps on it..
situations like that.. u know..
__________________ "NOw, if you two don't mind...
I'm going to bed..
before either one of you..
come up bad to another clever I did..
and get us killed, or worst..
ExPeLLed..."
forgive me all, but i was very dissappointed seeing the goblet of fire.....expecting something that wasn't portrayed. Lots of part where not portrayed well some twisted do not inclined with the book......however It was splended, very nice special effect and that i cant wait for the next harry potter movie then.....
I liked it. It was really scary at some parts, but others so funny and cool. The bath scene, for instance. Y'know, when Harry goes to the prefects bathroom and opens the egg underwater? Myrtle (spelling?) was so funny. I was laughing my head off
__________________
Brill Siglet By Piggle Humsy, Thanks Loads!!
Yeah, the movie was fast paced, But if you think about it, the other movies were pretty slow. They dragged on too much. And Emma Watson did overact a small bit, but she was pretty much the only one of the three of them who did. That's just my opinion
KMC Community Forums
Nov 24th, 2005 10:00 PM
