 |
Rockula
Member
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: United States |
Adventure not sci-fi.
That is all I meant.
|
May 13th, 2002 10:07 PM |
|
|
| |
|
Dexx
wingless
Gender: Male
Location: Bucharest, Romania |
k 
|
|
May 14th, 2002 04:26 AM |
|
|
| |
|
Dim
Creativity
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: Southern California |
I thnk that maybe it would have been better to have done this kind of thing as a totally new character instead of Croft: Digital pinup girl.. it kind of got it off on the wrong foot.
__________________
|
|
May 14th, 2002 01:16 PM |
|
|
| |
|
queeq
Chaos
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: JP's bed |
Nah, I doubt that. The problems with a production like this can easily be seen by the amount of writers: the more writers, the worse it is. Same with the Flintstones and some others.
Jolie was definately the embodiment of Croft, she did well and acted well. The script just sucked.
I agree that they should not have so much supernatural stuff in it. It's gotta be a good thriller, I can take a weird monster or two, but it takes a real villain of flesh and blood and somehow related to Croft to make it worthwhile.
It has lots of potential, too bad producers hooked their claws into it.
Then again, as long as she runs a lot, I like it!
__________________
|
|
May 14th, 2002 02:49 PM |
|
|
| |
|
ParanoidAndroid
I Brush and Floss Daily!
 Gender: Unspecified
Location: United Kingdom |
I thought that the first movie had it's problems too, but for all the people saying that it sucked, well...I'd just like to say I think that Lord of the Rings was the worst crap I'd seen in a long time, and the last two star wars movies really didn't lift my skirt either. I got real excited about Ep. II, with Jango fett and all, but it was kind of a let down.
|
|
Oct 11th, 2002 11:15 AM |
|
|
| |
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is OFF
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
Text-only version |
|
|
KMC Community Forums
