Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
I'm willing to stop this stupid arguement any time dude just check what I've written about possibilities
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Knowledge was lost. Things were destroyed. Things weren't properly preserved. A lot of powerful items were destroyed by the Sith Academy on Korriban(Kreia in KOTOR 2). It would be like if there was another world war and 90% of everything on the entire planet was destroyed. Same thing. A lot of knowledge was lost by Revan's time.
__________________ http://darthglentract.tripod.com/index.html Go Jawa's!!
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Not necessarily, plaguesis could do insanely more powerful things then sadow (like playing god) and he was much later on, kun and nadd could also do insanely powerful things we don't hear about the ancient sith doing.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
i really don't care dude this is going no where unless we come to the previously mentioned truce this thread just won't end.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: May 2005
Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
Now Frobo...really...that is simply stupid.
Ragnos reign marked the highest point of Sith knowledge. From that point on it declined. That's a fact. If you don't believe me just watch the Sith history.
Sadow: Most impressive thing done with Sith magic was blow a star up
Nadd: Most impressive thing done with Sith magic was singlehandly defeat the entire army of beast masters on Onderon
Kun: Most impressive things done with Sith magic were freezing the Senate on Coruscant and draining the the lifeforce of hundrets of Massasi
So there is a decline in knowledge and power as you can see. Revan never did something compareable and the most impressive Sith techniques he used were the dark side abilities available in KotoR I. And they are nothing compared to the ability to destroy a star.
__________________
"Dear God, what is it like in your funny little brains?"
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
The first point merely shows that the strongest doesn't always rule that's all.
I used the exact same logic you used to support ragnos and it's common sense
Revan hardcore pwns malak, malak>kavar Revan hardcore pwns kavar.
Korriban also had knowledge inside the tombs and such.
Yes ragnos's gauntlets did make him powerful but not as powerful as if he had all the other mentioned artifacts.
The difference between tarkin and Revan is very simple, Revan used the force to use the darkside energies inside the star forge to control a sun, tarkin commanded some troops to press buttons big difference.
My opinion is that Revan has more knowledge (sith knowledge growing not declining) and more artifacts and a large amount of raw potential.
Just admit that we don't know enough about ragnos to find a clear victor and we can end this now
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Do we know that Ragnos's abilities exceeded sadows? nope its probable but not proven.
So nadd was weaker,
Exar blew up a star and freeze thousands of senators and jedi on couruscant itself that's just as damn impressive
Revan harnessed a sun to make an army
Plageusis Played god which is by far more impressive then anything sadow did
Think of it this way
sadow could throw stars sadow leaves star throwing knowledge behind
nadd leaves knowledge behind on top of sadows
exar leaves knowledge behind on top of sadows and nadds etc.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
Obviously you didn't get the point. Fishy, I'm as much an advocate for Revan being potentially very good as anyone... But the point I was trying to make here is that almost all of the crap Frobo and Emperor Revan have been lobbing at us IS assumptions! Most of them I arrived at myself months ago! And honestly, they all stand on shaky ground. That's not a debateable truth there... Still, Frobo and Emperor have sat her going round and round in circles trying to show that Ragnos is some total wuss and that Revan is god, when they can't prove to me if Revan is even alive. Now I know as wlel as you do Revan's 99.99999% gonna be in the next sequel. But if you can't prove to me he exists at that point, you can't prove to me he got any stronger than he was at th end of KOTOR I.
Let's me go back over my points and see what I can do...
- Kavar was a notable Jedi master. Vrook outranks him, as does Zhar and Vandar. Kavar was a council member and member of the Jedi guardians, and he was popular as evidenced by Mandalore being surprised it wasn't Kavar leading the armies. But nowhere does it say he is the best. Nowhere. Now you're fighting assumption with assumption.
- I admit your reasoning makes sense. But my point remains... as of now, with what we have... -you cannot know-. And because of that, Revan's validity insofar as accomplishments is about the same as Ragnos'.
- I did argue that he had his own style. I also argued he used Juyo ro Makashi. But the point is I don't know. And my assumptions were made based on one five second reel.
- Malachor V was a potent place, sure. But if you can't prove specifically how it affected Revan, if at all, what good does it make in an argument? And don't give me the "willpower" routine. Nowhere does it say willpower beats opposition in Jedi battles.
- You have Kreia's word on that. Prove up, Fishy. If you must give Kreia's words credibility, than you must concede that Marka Ragnos was an effective ruler who was strong physically and in the Force.
- Malak has shown nothing that is anywhere near on the level of Exar Kun. Speculation. Prove up.
- Again, you have no knowledge on the contrary to say it -wasn't- sabotaged. You also have nothing to go on as far as how powerful each and every person was who attempted to control it. you have a statement from Bastila, and you flew with it. Prove up.
- Revan is legendaric in his own time, basicall forgotten beyond that. Ragnos is legendary even in Luke's time. Your point?
Sorry Fishy, but you singled me out. Now you have to put up or shut up, man. Revan IS good, and I like him. But for the sake of this argument I am going to undermine him and his followers with everything I have simply because they have nothing to stand on.
Registered: May 2005
Location: .::The Anti-Fanboy Confederation::.
That's true if:
a) there is only one other person to challange you
b) you can take that person in an "unfair" way
For what we know there were at least 20 persons to challenge Ragnos and he took the title in a fair fight. So this is very much compareable to the circumstances Malak and Sidious received the title of a Dark Lord in.
If Ragnos would have not been the strongest guy there one of the others would have killed them now: What did people like Malak and Sidious have to fear ? Malak had to fear nobody because the only other Sith that could challenge him was Revan himself. Sidious after killing Plagueis had none opponent that could challenge him for his title. If - in the ancient Sith Empire - Person A would have defeated Person B in an "unfair" way (assasination, murder while sleeping and so on) thereby taking the the title of the Dark Lord, the other 19 Sith Lords would have challenged Person B instantly in a fair fight and if Person B wasn't strong enough his title would have been lost. Simple as that. So there was always the strongest one ruling of the ancient Sith Empire because anything else would make no sense.
Revan hardcore pwns Malak ? Every source says they were close to each other in power. Their battle on the Star Forge is descriped as "epic" and now Revan hardcore pwns Malak ?
And yes...there was knowledge on Korriban - still that is knowledge that was left there by the ancient Sith Lords.
Now great. Actually this is Ragnos (alive) vs Revan. Now Ragnos comes with his own gauntlets of course (so Revan can't use them the same time) and his uber-powerful Sceptre that can force drain other force users, entire places the force itself, can charge up an entire army of non-force users with enough powers to use lightning and it makes the user more powerful.
Revan is toast...
Nice oppinion but I did provide proof that Sith knowledge declined and not increased. So you are obviously wrong in that point. Not that it would matter much since Ragnos with his sceptre (the dumbest invention ever) is pretty much invincible.
__________________
"Dear God, what is it like in your funny little brains?"
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
- Okay, for the sake of argument, let's assume that you're right, that taking the throne is that easy. How is maintaining it easy for over a century and a half on a planet teeming with greedy, evil Sith? Please, enlighten us.
- Yes indeed. Logic time. For game play mechanics' sake, you fought two terenteks... Also for mechanics sake, you fought dozens of dark jedi and sith, hundreds of troops, and possibly some civilians too. Wow, to think he did all that! Wait... that's assumption based on game play experience. And it's bullshit. I could just as easily say The exile killed thousands of hssiss, since there is an inifinite respawn on Korriban.
- Where is it shown that Kreia is pwned by Revan? Specifically? Prove up
- Well, I must be forgetting things in my advanced age. Am I the only one here who doesn't recall Tulak's holocron being salvaged, considering that the old Sith escaped with it? How could he have it and it be available for you to find in a body somewhere?
- Never says Revan learned everything. Zhar says he has an insatisable thirst for knowledge. Thus with that we can -assume- that he tried to learn everything he could, but since we know nothing of the knowledge that was at Malachor V, nor if he succeeded in gleening every last bit while waging a three year war, it means nothing. Besides... where the hell do you think this knowledge came from? If KOTOR III comes out and Revan uses a Force ability he learned from a Ragnos holocron, I hope you choke on your drink at that moment. Well, not really. But it'd be funny to see.
- If the force is equally powerful on both sides, how come good always seems to barely win? The point is, the light side of the Force does not use aggressive, deadly powers like the dark side does. Light siders do not choke, shock, crush, poison, drain, or otherwise directly harm their opponents if they don't have to. Light siders abide by a code of ethics even in combat. So tell me... what do you have to show that says they are completely and irredeemably equal in anything?
- Again, possible gameplay experience. This is like me saying the exile has Malak's robes, Jolee's robes, Missions' armband, and Freedan Nadd's equipment just because its possible to get all of them in game (And it is). The only artifact even mentioned in the sequel was Ajunta Pall's blade. And that does what exactly? Well, if I argue from game play as you do, I think it does darkside damage or poison, right?
- Where are those multiple quotes? you know obviously. Tell me.
- Again, define lifetime. By all accounts, Revan couldn't have been older than a few decades, seeing as he was a Jedi knight when he went to war. Since the average age of a jedi knight is 25-28, Revan wasn't older than thirty when he left, presumably. And seeing as the Jedi didn't recruit from birth then like they did later, we can't say for certian when he was inducted into the Order. But, for the sake of argument, let's say 11. So from 11 to 30, he got a total of 19 years of experience under the Jedi. So by your logic, every PT jedi master must be better than him, seeing as most were in their late forties and fifties, or older and had been trained since birth. Also, you say Kreia says so. Kreia also supports Ragnos. She also lies. She also says the Exile is the most powerful one she has trained, which would make him more powerful than Revan. Back up Kreia's words, if you will with some insight into her mindset.
- Secondly, define planet FULL of information. For all you know, there could have been five books shelves with three holocrons a piece at Malachor V or Korriban. Point is, you don't know... so you're making wild speculations in order to give Revan that extra boost.
- Where oh where does it say that the Star Forge even controls the sun? I haven't seen that yet. Last time I checked, the Star Forge drew on the Force itself. Maybe the game has changed since I played it. I dunno.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
Janus your throwing that stuff out there purley out of spite.
certain things in the game have to be accomplished in order to beat it things like beating two tenatrak.
As for the knowledge we know that both planets had lots of sith knowledge malachor being called a warehouse full of info.
What each side does is irrelevant they both have the same amount of power to fraw from also jedi are not above using darkside techniques should need be:
also for the artifacts revan has to raid at least two tombs (along with other things)to pass the trials
Luke used choke
windu used crush
revan could have used others
exile could have used others
as for keeping the throne there are numerous possibilities all i'm doing is throwing them out there because at the moment we simply don't have enough on ragnos to be able to say that he would win so it's a possibility he would beat revan it's a possibility he won't and you can't prove up and if i try to you'll attack everything I say out of spite, neither of us ultimatley will be able to prove why our charachter would win we'll merely have a list of reasons the other guy wouldn't this is futile no one can win this as we simply don't have enough info on ragnos end of story.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
I'm not doing this out of spite. I'm frankly sick of you and Emperor Revan carrying on like your the paragons of truth, when your arguments are -as flimsy- as Ragnos', the key difference being their is a better reason to fear and respect Ragnos than there is Revan, personally. Now, I may never convince you and that's okay. But you both have gone way out of your way to contest our decisions and yet have nothing to back it up. You can't even 100% support your own character in ANY fight, seeing as you must make similar assumptions all the time.
Such as...
- The assumption that because you had to do so in game Revan had to do so in the canonical story.
- The assumption that all that "lots of Sith knowledge" helped make Revan even on a level to last twenty seconds with an ancient Sith before his time.
- The assumption that all that knowledge wasn't Ragnos' (Seeing as he did rule for a century and a half)
- The assumption that since you had to raid at least two tombs in game Revan neccessarily HAd to raid them in game and that he found all these artifacts and kept them. And that in assuming he kept them, this means anything in relation to his power compared to Ragnos.
- The horrible assumption that both sides are about the same.
- The assumption that Luke in ROTJ abides by the Jedi code.
- The assumption that because Revan and the Exile are fully customizable (One of the key facts for marketing the game was that it was make your own SW jedi) they neccessarily used both sides.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
First off certain things HAD to be done or else you couldn't beat the game, revan had to do certain things on korriban he had no choice otherwise he would not have learned the location of the star forge.
I never said they used both sides I said possibly
And the rest of the assumptions are no worse then assumptions that ragnos supportewrs have made some are slightly more logical.
I don't do this because I like revan he's a fictional charachter and not even my favourite one I do this to show you that there isn't enough info to make a clear descision like I said way earlier in this debate.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: Hiding from zombies
If you were out to show that it wasn't clear either way, you would have shown instances where Revan's power was in question. You didn't. If anything, you did the opposite and regurgitated every good thing about Revan you could find, grasping at straws. That is fanboyism. I am the one being impartial here.
By the way, I suggest you read the Fall of the Sith comics, and the Sith Golden Age ones too, if you can find PDFs of them on fileshare... because it might help you realize exactly what you're arguing against.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
I merely supported revan when he was attacked that's all and I used facts I've used many times in the past. but who cares all that really mattered to me was people making assumptions then being aroagant enough when i point out that those weren't facts from there on i just wanted people to realize their isn't enough info to make a fair descision. theirs only opinion.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!
The same arguments have been going back and forth over the last twelve pages, formulating into more aggressive words and spiteful insults each time.
Now, I think Frobo's idea was best, that you guys come to a truce, seeing as how I think this is a crappy thread anyway. (No offense LIB) However, I myself think that Ragnos would take Revan, so let's just put it this way. There's not enough information or canonical evidence on EITHER of these characters to judge the victor. Plain and simple.
EDIT: Oh yeah. And pat yourselves on the back for an argument well done.
Registered: May 2005
Location: somewhere over the rainbow
yeah truce I could be a jerk and mention that if you listened to me we could have arrived ad said truce two pages ago but lets forget that and just truce it up, very very well done windu.
__________________ The whole world trembles in fear before my awesome unholy army of garden gnomes soon we will rule the world and from there...home depot!!!