The links are a page someone has created, where they use quotes from the half-blood prince to support the idea that A) Dumbledore is not dead B) Dumbledore planned out his death scene with Snape C) Snape's Innocent.
I'm not sure if he is dead or not it has good and bad potential for the book seven storyline either way
Gender: Unspecified Location: Funny place called Earth
There is something suspicius that I noticed... in book says that Dumbledore baged for his life for the first time. He wouldn't beg!!! I mean , he is Dumbledore , he wouldn't do that! J.K. is tricking us! Well , maybe... I hope...
p.s. sorry for bad english I'm improving it
__________________ This one is stupid in the force
Im kind of on the side that Dumbledore is actually really dead. But one part still confuses me, Why were Dumbledore and Snape arguing. Dumbledore was telling him there was something he had to do, and Snape didnt want to do it. Maybe dumbledore ordered snape to kill him so snape could continue to be the Dark Lords most trusted servant? i know it sounds strange and stupid, but im confuzzled. And yeah, why would Dumbledore plead for his life? Maybe he was pleading with him to do what he needed to do for the plan to be carried out.
__________________ Best Harry Potter Fanfiction ever-http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f92/t380143.html
Gender: Male Location: Barkdonald's Inc. OMFGPlulz: dunt
That may be one of the dumbest sites I've ever been to.
The guy is so desperate for Dumbledore to be alive that he pulls Excuses out of nowhere, and puts them In ways that make everyone believe them.
Take this for Example:
Or, he knew Harry would do something stupid, like pop out from under the Cloak. He knew that Draco wouldn't have tried to take the school by himself, and would have had Death Eaters with him. Lots of Death Eaters + Harry = End of story.
Also:
Or, maybe he was pulling excuses out of his bum, trying to save himself? If he's alive, he can help the Order more. Duh.
... Yeah, he's dead. I doubt it was his first choice to die though. Then again, we don't know what Fawkes was doing during all this. He might have been attacked by A Death Eater, and the Lament was really just him crying out in pain on top of one of the towers.
The whole "Avada Kedarva doesn't make you fly back!" argument makes no sense. Who ever said spells do exactly the same thing every time? His nonverbal spell thing contradicts him here- Who says none of the other Death Eaters there didn't blast him off at the same time?
No. He fell off the Tower. What the hell do you think happens when you fall a hundred feet? He didn't have his wand either; He didn't slow himself down or cushion the fall.
She'd could be doing anything. Healing an Injured order member, or even, as I said, Healing herself or dying and crying out for help.
(I don't really believe Fawkes was attacked, I'm just saying that for the sake of Argument.)
Dumbledore's wand was lying on the tower still. Does J.K. mention Harry's wand when he's eating Lunch? You just don't talk about things that aren't important at that time.
These quotes contradict each other again. "What if Dumbledore's Body wasn't even there?" "What if Fawkes took Dumbledore's body from his Grave?" Make up your mind.
You're poking into something you know nothing about. Perhaps all Wizard Funerals happen like this. Perhaps it's something special for Dumbledore?
And, there you have it. I've just prove how each of those can be wrong.
Yes they burned his body, but a phoenix rose out of it. I thought that was odd. Like I said anything can happen because there are so many ways of seeing the "facts" (just to clarify, I DO think DD is dead, but sometimes I like to play devil's advocate)
Wasn it strange that dumbledore seemed so calm about harry's story about snape arguing with Draco of Voldemorts plan? like snape had already told him? and why is it exactly that jk rowling dedicated the title to snape and the chapter where he made the umbreakable vow. its obvious that hes a double agent and that dumbledore isnt dead. There is also the time where hagrid told harry that he saw dumbledore and snape arguing and snape disagreed. snape would have not told dumbledore about the plan if he really did want him dead. he needed to seem like he killed him cause he had no other choice, he made an unbreakable vow.
I doubt if that will make difference as bashing is way worse than double-posting....although he did do that on purpose so.....I'll report him anyway.
__________________
"To all visitors from Transylvania looking for the head of Voivode Dracula: Yes, we have it. Yes, he's dead. No, you cannot see it. No, he will not return and invade you again. It has been over thirty years, please stop pestering us."
KMC Community Forums
Jun 19th, 2006 09:59 PM
I'm improving it 
