Good luck with that. Bush stepping in to Trinidad would mean more fighting against people who don't want Americans there- the kidnappers and murderers- but on a much closer front, which would be a bit worrying.
Colombia has the same issues as Trinidad, as do a lot of South American countries.
America does a lot for other coutries, it doesn't matter how little or how much they give. The point is that they are helping. And not to mention that the USA have helped other countries in the war worlds. Bush is doing the best he can. Going to Iraq was pointless at first, but now they are helping Iraq, and that should be a good thing.
Thanks Rex. Maybe I shoulden broading my thing a little more to the other countries that have that same problem.
So the US is supposed to go to that country to stop that? Tell me how would they do that? Sending in forces isn't going to make the country obey the laws. Its just going to make the US more and more hated. Unless that country asks for international help with this problem (which it won't) nobody has the right to move in.
And Bush isn't stupid enough to go in. The country has nothing to give to the US.
They can help with their government, as well as stoping all of this insanity. And Trinidad did ask for help, but no response yet. They asked US and London...and Trinidad has a lot of oil too...
Actually , Trinidad does have oil . That isn't even the point of this thread , but just so all of you know out of research I know that Trinidad has oil.
actually Hermione, it does have to do with everything. some people think that Bush doesn't do anything unless it benifits himself and his country, but US is the richest and the most powerful country in the world.
that is a good question, but what else could the US need? like i had mentioned it is the richest country...so why would they try to get money? and it is the most powerful country....
And guess what? The security council has a few country's in it that really don't want to go to war right now.. Or intervene in something like this, but the simple fact is. The UN is not a police force. They can help here but they would be doing something they are not supposed to do.
Unless a civil war is going on the UN has no reason to be there... And with a civil war its really hard to determine which side is right and wrong because both will do shit they shouldn't. The UN is not going to go in with some soldiers to stop crimes from happening.
Crimes? is that what you're calling them? Have you read the hundreds of articles that happened? Did you know that terroism could be going on there too? when will it be enough for the UN to get involved? Do they have to go when thousands are killed? they would be going for the right thing...saving hundreds of lives...
Europe isn't going to touch this thing either. And why the US, because thats what the thread title said
Yes i'm calling them crimes, because thats what they are. Is there a war going on there? No. Then how the hell could the army stop it. You need more police officers not a freaking army. They might be able to prevent it from happening but they would never capture the people responsible. All it would do is make the army thats there hated. And eventually the people that are making money out of this shit will find ways to continue their work.
An army isn't going to be a good thing in a situation like this. You need a police force.
I think last week more than 200 Iraqi's died. Bush should probably clean up one mess before creat... I mean fixing another. Trinidad is pretty oil-rich though so you never know.