Playing on the PC is not just about the graphics. The idea is wrong. If I remember correctly, the majority of people on Steam who did the hardware survey are using mid-range computers.
A few years ago, I would agree but considering the amount of good quality ports PC is getting now, it's not just about graphics, it's a viable market.
The PC market continues to expand at a steady pace. It is on path to overtake console gaming in a few years.
I found a chart somewhere that showed PC Gaming to have steadily risen each year...for the most part. Meaning, the idea that PC gaming was faltering was never true. What ACTUALLY happened was an explosion in console gaming (meaning, there was an addition of non-gamers into gamers for a period there.)
While it's true stores have been a bit lackluster when it comes to housing PC games, Steam and other downloadable sites have easily taken over and more so than stores could ever have done.
Unfortunately, sales figures are rarely given out when it comes to downloadable tiles but the evidence of every major release being released on the PC (more so than before) shows that the PC market is doing quite well.
Gender: Unspecified Location: With Cinderella and the 9 Dwarves
Personally I think we'll see "PC"s as we know it vanish almost completely from the consumer market. And the devices will be more of a mix of console traits and computer traits (like we see with the current consoles and like we see with the iPad). I think the separation between the two will be meaningless within 10 years, whether you call it the death of the PC or the death of the consoles will be up to your own preferences..
I just see consoles being used more and more for other entertainment purposes, specifically for live television and what not.
We might get smaller with our devices but people will still hook them up to a monitor and have a keyboard/mouse, so I still think PC gaming being relevant.
Well, it doesn't matter to me if I play the games that are currently being released today on a tablet, desktop, or laptop as long as I have a keyboard/mouse, or controller.
I don't see current gaming that involves some sort of controllers losing any interesting. I think people will always want to play with one so I don't think gaming will change drastically.
What the devices are will change but how we play probably won't.
What makes you think ps'll outsell the 360 in '12? what does the ps3 have besides having the most exclusive titles. and also don't mention move.
to me, if the ps3 is to surpass the 360 in sales in '12 it must fully fix psn, which, as always, is second to xbox live, their price tag, which was/is ridiculous, i know that the ps2 is the best selling console of all time but they became too overconfidant with the outcome, they thought they had a golden egg with the ps3 and then they overpriced to their failure because it is now last in this generation, in terms of sales. there were other factors like release time but you get the picture. they make sh*tty hardware, i know the 360 has the rrod but ps3's are so sensitive. Their ports are horrible, i can go on. but those are just some of the issues sony needs to address if it's to outsell the 360 in '12, as you say it will.
And pc's are talked about because of graphics, what's wrong with that? and it's not only graphics. it's the technology and optimization that's the overall factor here. with microprocessors advancing exponentially and high powered gpu's becoming as complex as they can be, the sky's the limit, figuratively speaking, because then i'll have to get into moore's law but that's another library.
on another tangent, my interest has slighltly faded with consoles and their half decade old uncustomizable tech. i liked consoles, i even played it more than i did pc, and i mean i still play my 360 at times but pc gaming is where my heart is. i'm more of a pc player because honestly, to me, it's currently the best video game.. device, if you want to call it that, overall, imo. it's definetely the most powerful video game device surpassing consoles by a whole generation, i'd have to say.
pc's will always be a generation ahead of consoles, i think.
but to me, personally, i believe pc's started surpassing consoles around early to mid-2000's with "half life 2", "doom 3", "counter strike", "moh:aa online" and "bf2 online". those games are what made me become more of a pc head than a 360 head.
__________________ "The darkside, Sidious, is an illness no true Sith wishes to be cured of, my young apprentice .."
There's the simple fact that PS3 has sold 55.5 million units worldwide in 5 years, while the 360 has sold 57.6 million units worldwide in 6 years. A year difference is in favor of SONY.
but the key here is "Worlwide". The 360 (as a console) it's only largely successful in the US, while in the rest of the world Sony kicks its ass. That's the reason PS3 is so close behind. Worldwide sells.
and no, I'm not taking about features or anything you think is "wrong" with the PS3. Move doesn't even compute into this either.
and BTW I not mentioning games, this is just like with Wii, console sells.
again: It's just numbers, total console sells
and Price tag? really?
The 160GB PS3 costs $250, the 320GB costs $300
The 4GB 360 costs $200, the 250GB costs $300
now take into account that you need a HDD, 4Gb is not enough, so in order to properly play you need to buy an HDD
a 250GB HDD costs $130 ($96 if you buy one off of Amazon)
now tell me, which one is cheaper?
[quickquote=13635584](auto quote)[/quickquote]
EDIT: what the hell, that post got deleted or what?
even taking those games into account, this was a bad year for Nintendo, its stocks have fallen, the sells have dropped... not remotely better than SONY in any way,
__________________
"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE
And no...you really don't need a harddrive to play. If you want to download a bunch of stuff, yes, but just to play and save games, no. I've owned my Xbox for four years now with a 20GB harddrive on it, and have never used up for than about 2GB on it.
Also, Microsoft's sales are only really poor in Japan, which is to be expected, since the competition is two Japanese consoles. And 250GB HDDs for the slim 360s are not $130 anymore and haven't been for a month or two - the 320GB ones were released at $130 and the 250GB ones were dropped to $100. And at any rate, you can just use a cheap flash drive for extra space.
... the same applies for Latin America.
The US is the only exception.
4GB may be enough for some, but what about DLC, digital downloads (both Arcade and retail)... or even demos?... heck you couldn't play Reach Co-op if you didn't have an HDD.
even priced @ $100 it's a hefty price to pay, especially when you can get a brand new 500GB HDD for PS3 for $50
__________________
"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE
And if you read my post, you'd see that I said that if you download stuff, then yeah, you'll need a harddrive. Not everyone bothers with DLC or Arcade games, though. And the 4GB systems do sell phenomenally well.
And sure, you can just swap whatever harddrive in the PS3 you want...if you feel like voiding your warranty. Another thing most people aren't willing to do.
anyways, just like you can swap the 360 HDD, you can do the same with the PS3, you don't open the system, just the HDD bay. the difference is SONY doesn't sell you the HDD, you are free to use any 2.5" SATA HDD you want
my point is only console sales, not which one is better, and now I've stated why I think PS3 will outsell 360 next year, that is all
we'll see what happens a year from now
__________________
"When Gotham is ashes, you have my permission to die." -BANE
Funny, because I've seen people get their repairs that otherwise would be covered under the standard warranty denied because they swapped the harddrive.
Never heard of such thing... but they may be getting screwed out of ignorance. or they somehow damaged the warranty sticker.
The manual tells you how to do it. You can call Customers Services for help on how to do it., there's no opening of the system of any kind. the warranty sticker has to go untouched. It's the same situation with a fat or slim models. if it wasn't possible they would have remove the feature off the slim version.
KMC Community Forums
Dec 6th, 2011 05:17 PM
