i didnt mind that there wern't many lines coming from spidey, bit more realistic that way, concentrating on the battle. looked cooler as well when you just heard him yell and murmer under the mask.
exactly,do those things and you have a good quality spiderman movie not to mention Gwen Stacy needs to be in a sequel.just dont make her like mary jane like they had mary jane become gwen stacy,or we got another mess all over again.
I want Spider-Man movies that aren't all about a girl,where MJ is attractive and fun,where the GG doesn't look like a power ranger reject villain,where Ock isn't manipulated by his tentacles and turns good,where Spider-Man is actually funny and cracks jokes when fighting his villains.
why do i want to remake the spiderman movie. Because I feel that it is necessary. It's also a side project at the moment. This remake isn't going to be a hollywood thing. Its just with me and my friends and seriously think it could be less boring than Raimi's interpretation of the wall crawler.
are you serious? seriously spideys sister,this has got to be the worst post you have ever made.the movies are plain horrible so were just talking here back and forth how if we had been allowed to put our input into them, how they could have been so much better.
No they are pure crap,you being the manspider fan you are,you refuse to see that though.They need to do the same thing with the spiderman movies they did with batman.All the batman movies made in the 80's were all crap and horribly betrayed the comicbook.Thankfully hollywood redeemed themselves with batman begins and made a batman movie that did the cape crusaders character justice and was the kind of batman movie made that batfans should have had back in 89 but were robbed of because of a stupid director being in charge.Thank god for Christopher nolan who is a fans director who made a batman movie that is much better than the four previous ones combined!! thats what hollywood now needs to do with spidey is stop remaking sequels and find a competent director who cares about the fans and restart the spidey franchise all over again the same way they brilliantly did with batman.
What you have got to think is, was the film good, don't think about the comics, Rami changed alot of things like no web shooters cause it wouldn't be realistic to have Peter make em. for a comic gr8, for a film not so gr8. Honestly i thought Toby was an awsome Peter cept in spider-man 2 then he was just depressed and whiney all the time, but he is a crappy spider-man. And did any1 eles notice he is realy quiet while spider-man (in the comics anyway) is realy loud. As for the power ranger costume, well i got nothing, but its better than green spandex i suppose.
The funny thing is when the people always go with the excuse that the web shooters will be unrealistic in a movie based in a comic book with superheroes and supervillains with fantastic powers and with the good guy always winning at the end. Please, we can tallk about reality in a movie about vietnam war, but not in a movie about spider man.
And nothing is worse than the green goblin costume. If they changed the costume from the comics, it shoud be with a better suit, not with that power ranger crap.
Tobey was an ok peter parker, but a terrible spiderman.
And those movies arent only bad because its unloyality to the comics, also because they are bad movies with bad scripts and corny lines and absurd scenes. So simple like that.
__________________ The beatles, best group ever.
John Lennon, Musical genius of all time
Helen Mirren and Julie Christie , most lovely british actresses of all time.
I wish they kept the orignal idea for webshooters, have him create them so he can controll the flow of his organic webbing, but for some reason they scrapped that idea.
No the film was not good and I can point out several things about it why it is such a horrible film.Raimi only changed the webshooters because he was too lazy to try and take the time to put them in,nothing else.please that is the funniest and laughable excuse that the webshooters are unrealistic. if anything,a person getting bit by a spider to cling to walls,have super strength,ect is even more unrealictic than that,so that is a lame and laughable excuse.the true reason they were not in the film was only of sheer laziness on Raimi's part,he was so wrong to be the director of these films.He needs to stick with his evil dead movies.these movies are horrible and it has nothing to do with not being like the comicbook.for instance,the spider bites peter and walks off without dying,guess what? looks like we are going to have several spidermen swinging around town now,that spider obviously loves biting people. thats just one example of how these movies are so horrible.I can go on and on about the horrible screenwriting of these movies that people refuse to see.