Hahaha.
Funny, kids dont use the internet.
Kids use the Net just as much as anybody else.
UMD cost 20 bucks.
Okay, that still a crap load of money for a copy that you cant watch on anything else.
Why would anybody in this world buy a UMD version of a movie over an DVD version?
Gender: Male Location: Chaos.
There can only be CHAOS!
No it doesn't. Plenty of ten year olds are getting PSPs. And the targetd age range for DS I believe was 16-32? Those aren't kids.
And UMDs are a rip, because for $20+ for new movies, you get the movie, with a whopping NO extra features, or in some special cases, an extra video or two, but nowhere near what the DVD counterparts have.
You don't understand what I am trying to say. You guys misunderstand. No nintendo is not for kids. I said time and again that I have a DS and like it better than the psp but when you guys say things that are not true about the psp just because you like nintendo thats where the problem is.
You saying DS is for kids?
How can I misinturpet that.
Basically what your saying is that the PSP is better because it has movies, music and the internet while the DS doesnt.
What I'm saying and some other people are saying to go against that, is that the an handheld doesnt really need that.
For example,
UMD's are a crock of shit.
Music, well, its cool to have, its pretty useless considering that CD players, mini disc players and Mp3 players is usually what people already have
And the net function on the PSP is useless also, because its slow, you cant input anything on the fly (bye bye KMC).
Basically, my point of view is that why would I pay more money for something I already have.
I wouldnt mind paying money for the PSP as a handheld, but not as an all in one device because I already have most of that shit.
And that the games are cheap ports of original PS2 games.
KMC Community Forums
Nov 11th, 2005 04:51 AM
Attachment: 
